Introduction to the True Bible Code

Welcome

This site, www.biblecodeintro.com, is our teaching site. It has been too long in the making. But here it is at last! www.truebiblecode.com is the reference site of the Lord's Witnesses.

This teaching site has around 45 lessons that take you through the basic (corrected, re-corrected and then corrected again) literal bible understandings of what we can scripturally prove is the 4th true Christian church, the Lord's Witnesses. Once you have read site, you should have the understanding needed to progress to the symbolic bible code itself, which is presented in the reference site. Please do not feel that you have to be a bible expert in order to join the LWs. You are quite welcome to join us without reading any of our understandings. Really you should be able to see from our doctrine that we represent God more closely than any other church. But the first law that we love God with all our heart, mind soul and strength moves us to seek an ever closer knowledge of what the bible actually means. That is why we go into such detail in our attempts to get the truth from the fountain. These websites are not examination papers, and neither are they irrelevant intellectual exercises. They are attempted expositions of the literal and symbolic meanings of bible accounts as far as we understand them. But they contain mind blowing spiritual truths (as best as we can understand and present them). Both sites together are now so comprehensive doctrinally, that they answer most of the questions one would normally ask the local priest, who however well motivated will not normally have the correct answer.

The idea is that you read enough of them to see that there is a God and that the bible is written in a concentrated code by an intelligence far greater than ours. And that Adam was a real person, the progenitor of the present race of humans, who sinned and was condemned to death subject to a stay of execution for the length of his human life. Jesus gave his life to ransom Adam thereby releasing our patriarch and all of his genetic children from that one death sentence, which is encoded in our DNA, which we inherited from Adam. And that the kingdom of God, which we pray for in the Lord's prayer, is a real administration of faithful mankind by Jesus and the saints, which began judicially in 2008 and will be upon us physically in 2009. And that there are two presences of the Christ and two true Christian churches in each presence. And the we, the Lords' Witnesses, are the second church of the second presence, the 4th and last true Christian religion. We have kept the intro site free of short term chronology in order that we do not have to update it too often!

There is a lot of information to consider. But thereagain, the bible was not written upon a postage stamp. This material is not set beyond the grasp of the human mind. But some of it is near the limit of our intellectual capability as one might expect from a God who is the father of all of our minds.

If you get stuck or can disprove any of our understandings, or just wish to discuss them please email us at: helpdesk@lordswitnesses.com

You can download the entire site in web format to read with your browser at your leisure. Or you can download it in PDF format to read with Adobe Acrobat or any other PDF or ebook reader. 

Index

The Road Map: A quick walk through this site followed by a detailed breakdown of each section.

[0]  Why should I study the Bible, what use is that old book to me in the 21st century?
[1]  There is a God - His name is Jehovah
[2]  Why did God create the Angels? Why did he create the universe? Why did he create us?
[3]  The Armageddon Equation and the Corruption Equilibrium
[4]  The Bible and its Translations

[5]  Pre Adamic man
[6]  Who were Adam and Eve?
[6a] The Gory detail of Original Sin - Read it here first folks!
[7]  The way the bible is written: Genesis 4, John 3 and the sons of Jacob
[7a]   Logical Pathways and one step thinking
[8]  From Adam to Noah to Abraham to David to Jesus, The Patriarchs

[9]  What is a soul, What is a Spirit?
[10]  Why do we die?
[11]  The Holy Spirit is God's Wife!
[12]  How is one born again without dying?
[13]  What is physical death?
[14]  What the Hell is Gehenna?

[15]  120, 240, 480, 960 and indefinite lifespan humans
[16]  An introduction to Satan, Michael, Gabriel
[17]  Michael was Enoch and Jesus
[18]  Jesus was non adamic and created by in vivo fertilisation and genetic enhancement
[19]  Gabriel was John the Baptist
[20]  Cainan was Melchizedek

[21]  The 15 non adamic humans
[22]  Satan, demonic possession and the gifts of the spirit

[23]  Satan is the ruler of this system of things
[24]  Jesus is the physical ruler of the next system of things, the Kingdom of God
[25]  Monarchy, Democracy, Qualifying Democracy, Constitutional Democracy, Qualifying Constitutional Democracy, Qualifying Constitutional Meritocracy, Qualifying Constitutional Philanthropocracy, Qualifying Constitutional Patriarchal Philanthropocracy.
[25a]   Men, Women, Love and Power

[26]   When Jesus gave his life for us, he became the second God to be worshipped like his father Jehovah.
[27]   Our destiny is to become Gods like Jehovah and Jesus
[28]   The 3 Master Salvation Covenants, the FRC, the CRC and the ARC and the 3 Blessing Covenants, the 1BC, the 2BC and the 3BC.
[28a]  The Two Ransoms of the Christ
[29]   Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the Abrahamic system mediators of the FRC, the CRC and the ARC
[30]   The Law of Moses
[31]   The First New Covenant
[32]   What exactly is baptism?
[33]   The start and end of the 3 baptisms

[35]   The Second New Covenant
[37]   The Lord's Witnesses, the church of the 2NC
[39]   The Top Ten Trinity Busters
[40]   The role of women in the Christian Church
[41]   When is abortion murder?
[41a]  How can one reconcile the vindictive God of the old testament with the forgiving God of the new testament?
[41b]  How can an omnipotent loving God permit so much pain and suffering?

[42]   The real heavenly currency

[43]   The Dates of Jesus’ birth and death
[44]   The Date of Armageddon without using the bible code
[45]   The 2 presences of the Christ
[46]   The 4 True Christian Churches

[50]   Definitions

List of most recently updated pages

30/11/2008 intro20.html
30/11/2008 intro5.html
19/11/2008 intro14.html
19/11/2008 intro27.html
19/11/2008 intro26.html
31/10/2008 intro25a.html
23/10/2008 index.html
22/10/2008 intro41.html
04/09/2008 intro35.html
18/08/2008 intro17.html
13/08/2008 intro39.html
02/08/2008 intro11.html
31/07/2008 intro15.html
30/07/2008 intro45.html
18/07/2008 intro28.html
11/07/2008 intro18.html
18/06/2008 intro1.html
11/04/2008 intro6a.html
06/04/2008 intro46.html

Introduction to the 4th True Christian Church

The journey you are about to start

1 And Jehovah proceeded to say to Abram: Go your way out of your country and from your relatives and from the house of your father to the country that I shall show you (Genesis 12).

Things are no different today. There is at most one true church since God presides not over chaos and division but over harmony and unity. To find this church, you will definitely have to leave the religion of your nation, for Jesus advises all Christians to keep clear of politics, and in most cases leave the beliefs of your relatives and leave the church of your father and go to the church that God shows you.

Introduction

This introduction to the 4^th True Christian Church a.k.a. the Lords’ Witnesses, represents a resume of our basic understandings of God’s word which was written down for Mankind over a period of some 1500 years from around 1513 BC to around 100 AD. The reader, whether a lifelong member of a more traditional and longer-established Christian or non-Christian denomination or an atheist, will find these understandings revolutionary in terms of mankind’s previous perceptions of God’s intentions for Man. These understandings make sense out of all the clap-trap that has been talked about God for centuries past by believers and non-believers alike. Lies are abusive, and regrettably all mankind are slaves to one or more lies, be they political, economic, theological or sociological. It is our hope and intention to release the reader from many of these slaveries with the fundamental truths behind our creation and existence and future.

32 And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free’ (John 8).

Definitions

Throughout the text, there are terms and acronyms that will be new to the reader. These terms have been coined by the Lords’ Witnesses to describe new understandings that are thought to be unique to the 4^th True Christian Church. There are other terms with which the reader is probably familiar but for which the Lords’ Witnesses’ understandings require either a more definitive explanation or a new meaning compared with conventional human wisdom. These terms are explained in section I50

The True Bible Code

The bulk of the material on this introductory web-site is based on the Lords’ Witnesses literal understanding of scripture. The LWs lay claim to be, and can conclusively prove that they are the only modern church to have uncovered the true bible code in which all of the original Hebrew and Greek scriptures are written. Due to its complexity, and the media fuelled mental laziness of modern man, we have kept the code out of most of this introduction. For the interested researcher the true bible code covered in the main web-site of the Lords’ Witnesses, www.truebiblecode.com/code.html.

The Road Map

This journey begins by reviewing the credentials of the bible and the evidence that there actually is a God who created the universe and all that is in it and caused his book to be written over many centuries by many individual scribes.

[0]  Why should I study the Bible, what use is that old book to me in the 21st century?
[1] There is a God - His name is Jehovah

Next we take a look at God’s creation and ask why he created intelligent sentient beings with free will and what problems these characteristics causes for their interactions and indeed for their viability.

[2]  Why did God create the Angels? Why did he create the universe? Why did he create us?
[3]  The Armageddon Equation and the Corruption Equilibrium

We`then take a look at the bible and its various translations.

[4]  The Bible and its Translations

Next`we take a more detailed look at God’s primary physical creation, Man. We consider ‘pre-historic’ mankind as well as the individual creations of Adam and Eve.

[5]  Pre Adamic Man
[6]  Who were Adam and Eve?

We then consider how precisely the bible and how it is written and how mankind reasons.

[7]  The way the bible is written: Genesis 4, John 3 and the sons of Jacob
[7A]  Logical Pathways and one step thinking

We then progress beyond Adam to look at some of the major characters that follow him with a view to the chronology of the generations. 

[8]  From Adam to Noah to Abraham to David to Jesus, The Patriarchs

The nature of God’s children is next examined in terms of their makeup and mortality. We take a closer look at God’s heavenly children in more detail in terms of how his spiritual children relate to him and to his physical children. Man’s mortality is considered in some more detail. Unrighteous Man’s fate after physical death is considered when we take you on a two way virtual tour around hell, in the hole that this may help you to avoid the one way ticket!

[9] What is a soul, What is a Spirit?
[10] Why do we die?
[11] The Holy Spirit is God's Wife!
[12] How is one born again without dying?
[13] What is physical death
[14]What the Hell is Gehenna

We now enter the territory of God’s legal plan for Man by looking at all 15 sons of God who have died sacrificially to save mankind by covenant. For there is more complexity to God’s salvation plan for Man than the sacrifice of the Lamb of Jesus Christ! The four main characters in the entire biblical drama, Satan, Michael, Gabriel and Melchizedek, are identified together with their key roles and associated spirit possessions.

[15] 120, 240, 480, 960 and indefinite lifespan humans
[16] An introduction to Satan, Michael, Gabriel
[17] Michael was Enoch and Jesus
[18] Jesus was non adamic and created by in vivo fertilisation and genetic enhancement
[19] Gabriel was John the Baptist
[20] Cainan was Melchizedek
[21] The 15 non adamic humans

Of these four we then look at the two main protagonists (Satan and Michael) in terms of their ruler-ship in this system and the kingdom to come and we see the effects of Satan’s influence in the political systems in this world. We then consider Jesus’ death and the status he thereby attained and we also see the archetype for our own ultimate destiny.

[22] Satan, demonic possession and the gifts of the spirit
[23] Satan is the ruler of this system of things
[24] Jesus is the physical ruler of the next system of things, the Kingdom of God

Next we attempt to apply some of God's love and wisdom and political understandings to the politics of the nations and to the politics of the relationship between a husband and a wife.

[25] Monarchy, Democracy, Qualifying Democracy, Constitutional Democracy, Qualifying Constitutional Democracy, Qualifying Constitutional Meritocracy, Qualifying Constitutional Philanthropocracy, Qualifying Constitutional Patriarchal Philanthropocracy
[25A] Men, Women, Love and Power

Now we jump to the big picture. The whole purpose of our existence.

[26] When Jesus gave his life for us, he became the second God to be worshipped like his father Jehovah
[27] Our destiny is to become Gods like Jehovah and Jesus

We then pick up the theme of salvation covenants again by looking at the main covenants brought care of the sacrificed sons of God. These are the legal basis of the Lords’ Witnesses’ understandings detailing God’s legal plan for the salvation of Mankind in his Kingdom.

[28] The 3 Master Salvation Covenants, the FRC, CRC and ARC. The 3 Blessing Covenants, the 1BC, 2BC, and 3BC
[29] Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the Abrahamic system mediators of the FRC, the CRC and the ARC

We then have a section on the Law of Moses and how it fits with the present day sense of justice.

[30] The Law of Moses

Then we have a section on the 1NC.

[31] The First New Covenant

Then we analyse the true meanings of the various forms of baptism.

[32] What exactly is baptism?
[33] The start and end of the 3 baptisms

Then we have two sections on the 2NC and its church.

[35] The Second New Covenant
[37] The Lord's Witnesses, the church of the 2NC

Now we tackle some old chestnuts that man has failed to deal with for far too long.

[39] The Top Ten Trinity Busters
[40] The role of women in the Christian Church
[41] When is abortion murder?
[42] The real heavenly currency

When every organ of the human body has cancer, there is only one prognosis. Today every organ of human society is corrupted. Our society will therefore die. It is merely a question of which organ fails first, which corruption is the most far advanced. But when will these things occur and what will be the sign?

[43] The Dates of Jesus’ birth and death
[44] The Date of Armageddon without using the bible code

Maturity. The reader should now be ready to understand how Jesus is present today.

[45] The 2 presences of the Christ

Finally we end with a glossary of definitions of the terms and acronyms we employ.

[50] Definitions

Help

Please do not struggle alone with our understandings. Email us or call us, and we will help you to get your head round them. We are not aggressive evangelisers, we will not brainwash you with our immutable doctrine. We are researchers and we know that you do not have to join our church to be saved. We are here to answer your questions, and we can answer most of the questions we are asked these days. A couple of minutes sending an email to us, may save you hours of headache!

• Contact us on our email helpline helpdesk@lordswitnesses.com

• Start reviewing the material on our main research web-site www.truebiblecode.com

• Come to one of our meetings

• Get baptised into the fourth (and last) True Christian Church

Detailed Index

[0]  Why should I study the Bible, what use is that old book to me in the 21st century?

This opening section does exactly what it says on the tin by asking the key questions surrounding the authorship and relevance of the bible and thereby setting the scene for all the following material in this introductory web-site of the Lords’ Witnesses.

    1. Jesus Christ's birth is the pivotal point in our measurement of History down to the present day

    2. The bible just may be the work of our creator and therefore be the instruction manual for mankind.

    3. The bible contains a set of rules that would prevent Mankind from wiping himself out.

    4. Does your love match God's definition of love as found in the bible?

    5. The bible contains the solutions to all the problems that mankind faces today.

    6. If you believe that God might just be the Grand Creator of all you know and love then plainly you should study his instruction manual for mankind.

[1]  There is a God - His name is Jehovah

The existence of a God is perceived by many people to be rather inconvenient. They do not want to have their lifestyle cramped by religious restrictions. They want to be free but these people do not yet understand the meaning of the words of Jesus... ‘and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free’. This section quite simply presents the evidence for the existence of God. Its main themes document a number proofs for his existence.

    1.  Sir Isaac Newton's Orrery compared to the Solar System.

    2.  Life was designed. It did not just happen by accident as witnessed by the universal grammar of the genetic code.

    3.  Only intelligence begets intelligence.

    4.  The Historicity of Key Bible Characters

    5.  The Old Testament prophesies many things about a Messiah who will come and save the sons of Israel

    6.  The Old Testament wisdom and non messianic prophecy

    7.  Evolution is the longest ever running theory that has never been scientifically proven.

    8.  The Bible says that there is a God, our creator, called Jehovah.

[2]  Why did God create the Angels? Why did he create the universe? Why did he create us?

This is our first step into some of the deeper meanings of the bible. God wanted to create a community of free willed individuals who could learn from others what he had learned for himself about love. He wanted to procreate. The whole universe is a nursery for his children to learn about love. Many of the lessons in that nursery demonstrate the catastrophic effects of the lack of love.

    1.  Angels are like people in that they are good or bad or just plain disinterested.

    2.  The creation of the earth and of the physical universe.

    3.  The creation of the heaven in which the angels dwell, the spiritual universe.

    4.  God was alone before he created anything.

    5.  God wished to procreate, so he created the angels in his image.

    6.  God created humans to physicalise the effects of love and of sin so that we, and the angels, learn how important it is to love God and one another.

[3]  The Armageddon Equation and the Corruption Equilibrium

Stability = Morality - Technology

This is what we call the Armageddon Equation. The stability of our society is the gap between our morality and our technology. If our morality is better than our technology then we have a future. If our technology is better than our morality then we may not have a future.

    1.  God has to allow us to destroy ourselves in order to teach most of us how not to destroy ourselves.

    2.  The corruption equilibrium states that the better our technology is, the more corruption we can sustain

[4]  The Bible and its Translations

If God can create the universe and mankind, then he can certainly ensure that a book is properly copied for a few thousand years. There are several translations of the bible that we can safely assume are good enough for our purposes of understanding the bible and decoding it.

    1. We recommend several different translations of the Hebrew and Greek scriptures.

    2. What is still needed is a translation which preserves both the literal and symbolic meanings contained in the bible. 

[5]  Pre Adamic Man

The Fundamental Christian says that Adam, who was created around 6,000 years ago according to biblical chronology, was the first man and so Archaeology is rubbish. The Archaeologist says mankind has for a fact been around for 30,000 years and we have good evidence that he has been around for over 2 million years, so the concept that we began with Adam 6,000 years ago is rubbish and therefore Genesis is rubbish. How do we resolve this apparent conflict between Science and Religion? They both cannot be right!

    1.  The book of Genesis, if read carefully, can be seen to describe two different creations of mankind, Pre-adamic man followed by 'the man' Adam and his children.

    2.  Pre-adamic Man could have sex but could not sexually reproduce.

    3.  Pre-adamic Man was created asexually by in vivo fertilisation by Holy Spirit as was Jesus. 

    4.  The creative 'days' of Genesis were not literal days, but epochs as we discovered in I2. 

    5. True Science and True Religion are the same thing, a sincere search for God, in his various works.

[6]  Who were Adam and Eve?

Modern sophisticated man who believes that we arrived here through evolution and who knows that mankind existed before Adam finds the biblical account of our creation to be somewhat lacking in credibility. However if we believe in God then clearly he is more intelligent than us, so it is inconceivable that we would know more about our creation than he does, so his book must reflect this knowledge gap. Also the bible indicates that God requires us to work for our physical food and likewise he requires us to work for our spiritual food. In other words we need to decode Genesis; we need to unravel it to fully understand our beginning as a species. 

    1.  Adam and Eve were real people, a man and a woman.

    2.  Adam was created in precisely the same way that Jesus was created.

    3.  Eve was created from a fully grown Pre-adamic person.

[7]  The way the bible is written: Genesis 4, John 3 and the sons of Jacob

We have seen in section I5 on Pre-adamic man that the Bible is written in a very intelligent way. We therefore have to read it intelligently and diligently. Here are 3 examples of how intelligently it is written and how intelligently we need to read it. First impressions of bible accounts are often incorrect. The Holy Spirit will wrong foot you if you do not think about every word in the account and put the entire jigsaw together. Our experience is that pretty much every time you revisit an account you see something in it that you did not see before.

    1.  Why did God accept Abel’s sacrifice and yet reject Cain’s sacrifice? 

    2.  Why did Rachel think that she was the winner in the procreation race with her sister Leah at the birth of Naphtali? 

    3.  No man has ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven  

[7A]  Logical Pathways and one step thinking

The bible clearly states that it is inspired, but how do we know if that statement is the truth?

    1.    Logical proof that the bible is inspired by our creator/creating species  

    2.    The courage of your deductions  

    3.    Some examples of deductions that everyone has confidence in.  

[8]  From Adam to Noah to Abraham to David to Jesus, The Patriarchs

This brief section contains the chronology of some of the main characters from the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures. We include this information in order for the reader to familiarise himself with these key players in our salvation.

    1.   The bible uses a lunar calendar.

    2.   The chronology of some of the main biblical characters.
 

[9]  What is a soul, What is a spirit?

Modern man has the soul and the spirit all mixed up. We untie the knot and straighten the picture out.

    1.  Definition of a Body

    2.  Definition of a Soul.

    3.  Definition of a Spirit. 

[10]  Why do we die?

Adam's sons and daughters are born condemned to death under the death penalty passed and eventually executed on Adam by God.

    1.  Adam sinned by eating the fruit of the forbidden tree and was consequently sentenced to death by God.  

    2.  The lengths of life of the pre-flood patriarchs of Genesis 5.

    3.  God changed Adam and Eve’s genes to the slowly dying variety that we all know today.

[11]  The Holy Spirit is God's Wife

The Holy Spirit is described by John as the helper; Adam's wife was described in the same way in Genesis. This is not a coincidence. Just as Eve was a complement and helper to Adam so the Holy Spirit is God's helper, and a complement to him. It is his wife. It is Jesus' mum. The three are a family.

    1.   The Holy Spirit is the group of all the angels who are holy, all the angels who are married to God.

    2.   The Holy Spirit is our spiritual Mother.

    3.   The whole congregation is regarded as being one body, one wife.

    4.   God has a family of which he is the father, the Holy Spirit is the mother, God's wife, and Jesus is now the firstborn son.

[12]   How is one born again without dying

Being born from water is a water baptism. Being born from spirit is a spirit baptism a baptism in holy spirit, which is being born again. 

    1.  Water Baptism leads to a rebirth in the flesh.  

    2.  When you are born again, an angel is created in heaven for your spirit to inhabit in the future.

    3.  Adam was born again when he was born. 

[13]  What is physical death?

The dead are unconscious and unthinking; they do not dream or think.

    1.  A dead person’s spirit is asleep temporarily in an angelic body in heaven. 

   2.  The human body precedes the angelic one for mankind.

[14]  What the Hell is Gehenna?

Gehenna is the Hebrew word for Hell. Mankind's attempts to understand the nature of Hell are classic examples of how imperfect and incomplete our thought processes are as a race and as individuals. The established Christian churches have given us a Hell of eternal torment, eternal punishment, eternal burning and eternal physical pain. The Lords’ Witnesses have a very different understanding of Hell.

    1.  The man who put the fires out in hell.

    2.  Hell or Gehenna is a prison for disembodied spirits, no more and no less.

    3.  Even the most wicked ones will get out of Gehenna since it is God’s purpose to save us all eventually.

    4.  Those who get the resurrection of the unrighteous end up in Hell, which is Gehenna which is the second death. 

[15]  120, 240, 480, 960 and indefinite lifespan humans

We are now going to discover the 4 types of human body that God created for sons of Adam and the maximum lifespan of each type of body. We need this information to determine which characters in the bible lived too long for their generation and were therefore non adamic like Jesus was. By this we mean characters who were sons of God rather than sons of Adam. We need to know all of the non adamic characters in the bible, the characters who are not under any death sentence from Adam or at all, because they all die sacrificially in order to ransom a mediator of a salvation covenant. Salvation covenants are the legal means by which mankind is saved into the Kingdom of God. Every salvation covenant gives you a future life in the Kingdom because a non adamic human gave his life as a ransom for that covenant.

    1.  The reducing ages of the Patriarchs from Adam to Moses.

    2.  After the flood the maximum lifespan of mankind became 120 years.

    3.  We deduce that there were 4 divisions by 2 to get from a maximum age of 960 years down to 120 years.  

    4.  The patriarchs Jared, Methuselah, Eber and Jehoiada, were non adamic like Jesus.

[16]  An Introduction to Satan, Michael and Gabriel

Satan was the first angel that God created. Michael was the angel that chose to be the most loyal to God and that loved men the most. Michael possessed Jesus during his entire ministry from his baptism until his sacrificial death. Satan lost his firstborn rights when he deceived Eve into losing her life and killing her husband. Michael gained these firstborn rights and more when he gave his life to ransom Adam, when he died sacrificially as an angel inside Jesus on the stake. We shall discover in later sections that Gabriel was loyal to both God and to Michael and played a huge role in the salvation of mankind and possessed John the Baptist. These 3 are the key angelic players in the story of mankind. In this section we discover and prove that they were born in the following order: 1. Satan, 2. Michael, 3. Gabriel.

    1.  Every major patriarch in the bible had a firstborn son who lost his birthright to a more deserving later born son.

    2.  Only after the resurrection is Jesus described as ‘the firstborn of all creation’.

    3.  Satan was the anointed Cherub covering Eden.

    4.  Michael became the foremost prince, the firstborn from the dead.

    5.   Noah's 3 sons compared with God's 3 sons.

    6.  Adam was an only child.

[17]  Michael was Enoch and Jesus

When Adam sinned God required a volunteer who was not judicially condemned to ransom him immediately. That volunteer could not have been human since the pre-adamics had no judicial and Adam and Eve had both sinned so as to incur the death penalty. So the volunteer was an angel. This angel then had to die on the stake in order to ransom Adam. So we can see that Jesus was possessed by an angel, Michael, the one who agreed to ransom him when Adam sinned. We shall also discover that Enoch was non adamic and was temporarily possessed by the angel Michael.

    1.  Michael, the prince of God’s people, came down into Jesus.

    2.  When did Michael become Jesus Christ?

    3.  Pre Michaelic Jesus was Immanuel

    4.  The resurrection of the Christ

    5.  Enoch was non adamic and was temporarily possessed by the angel Michael.

[18]  Jesus was non adamic and created by in vivo fertilisation and genetic enhancement

A Non Adamic Human is a descendant of Adam who is not a genetic son of Adam but is a son of God.

   1.  Did the Holy Spirit commit adultery with the virgin Mary?  

   2.  God must have enhanced Jesus’ genes to make them non adamic.

    3.  Comparison with Abraham and Sarah

    4.  God used an Adamic vehicle to create a non adamic son.

[19]  Gabriel was John the Baptist

The presiding priest over the baptism ceremony of Jesus was John the Baptist. Now a sinful human cannot preside over an angelic possession by Michael into a non adamic human (by the dirty water principle). So we are going to reveal a sacred secret of the greatest magnitude here. 

    1.  John the Baptist was a supernatural conception

    2.  God can only choose a name for a son if the son is his.

    3.  Gabriel is the only candidate to have been the priest presiding over the entrance of Michael into Jesus.

    4.  The two John the Baptists

[20]  Cainan was Melchizedek

Melchizedek is a key character in the scriptures, but no man in recent times has known who he was. We need to do some detective work with the bible to determine who this elusive Melchizedek chap really was. It is not particularly important to know that Cainan was Melchizedek. It is important, however, to understand that Melchizedek presided over the entrance of the Angel Gabriel into another non adamic human. Understanding this, is the key to unlocking the identities of all 15 non adamic humans in the bible. These are revealed in the next section - see I21. 

    1.  Paul’s description of Melchizedek.

    2.  Cainan’s very strange genealogy.

    3.  Cainan was a non adamic priest.

[21]  The 15 Non Adamic Humans

The reason that we are pursuing the identities of all the non adamic humans is that they all die sacrificially (not being under any adamic death penalty) in order to ransom various human mediators in the great salvation covenants which give us a future. We cannot teach you about the legal basis of your salvation, without first explaining the identities and the makeup of the characters who are saving you. Every salvation covenant gives you a future life in the form of a resurrection or a rapture because a non adamic human gave his life for that covenant. 

    1.  Jesus, John, Enoch, Cainan, Jared, Methuselah, Eber, Jehoida, Elijah and Elisha were non adamic.

    2.  Jeremiah and Isaac were named or known before they were conceived in the womb.

    3.  Daniel and Ezekiel were called 'son of man'.

    4.  So who was Melchizedek at the time of Jesus? 

    5.  The meaning of Jacob's ladder.

[22]  Satan, Demonic Possession and the gifts of the spirit

In the previous section we saw that there have been 10 angelic possessions of humans by Michael and Gabriel and that the non adamic priest Melchizedek has appeared 5 times. Now the great thing about God, is that although he is omnipotent and omniscient in every sense, he limits himself with his own justice and never abuses his power to give himself an unfair advantage in any legal dispute. So since God allows himself angelic possessions in order to save mankind, he has to allow Satan demonic possessions as well. Although what Satan achieves from the majority of these demonic possessions apart from providing ideas for horror movie scripts is unclear.

    1.  How do angelic and demonic possession work?  

    2.  What were the gifts of the spirit and how and to whom were they given?  

    3.  How does one get the physical gifts of the spirit?  

[23]  Satan is the ruler of this system of things

When Adam sinned and was thrown out of the garden, Satan was given rulership over mankind.

    1.  Death is Satan's name.

    2.  Satan is called 'the ruler of the world'.

    3.  Armageddon marks the end of this system of things. 

[24]  Jesus is the ruler of the next system of things, the Kingdom of God

The Kingdom of God is the Kingdom that Jesus preached about and that we all pray for in the Lord's prayer. Jesus gave his disciples and us the signs of the times to alert us to the general period in which it would come.

    1.  What will the Kingdom of God be like?  

    2.  The Kingdom of God lasts for 1,000 years  

    3.  Who is resurrected into the Kingdom of God?

    4.  The Sea is No More

    5.  The Animals and the Food in the Kingdom of God  

[25]  Monarchy, Democracy, Qualifying Democracy, Constitutional Democracy, Qualifying Constitutional Democracy, Qualifying Constitutional Meritocracy, Qualifying Constitutional Philanthropocracy, Qualifying Constitutional Patriarchal Philanthropocracy.

When you consider the incredible technological advances mankind has made in the last 200 years, it is absolutely astonishing that we have made absolutely no advances at all in political methodology for the last 2,000 years. As a race, since Adam, we have 'advanced' from monarchy to democracy and that is it. This tells us that mankind has been held back by a very powerful intelligence. Satan is that powerful ruler of this system.

    1.  Constitutional Democracy

    2.  Qualifying Democracy  

    3.  Evangelising Democracy  

    4.  Democracy is institutional demographic prejudice

    5.  Qualifying Constitutional Meritocracy  

    6.  Qualifying Constitutional Philanthropocracy

    7.  Qualifying Constitutional Patriarchal Philanthropocracy  

[25A]   Men, Women, Love and Power

Satan has not changed since the Garden of Eden and neither have women and neither have men. He is doing precisely the same thing with women today through the media as he did nearly 6,000 years ago with Eve through the snake. His pitch to Eve today is to sell her the death of her relationship or her marriage on the grounds that God made a mistake making the man to be her head, and that she too can have the status of a man and be the absolute head of the family. Satan convinces her that she herself can decide what is good or bad or right or wrong for her family without needing to consult her husband, just as he did in the case of Eve nearly 6,000 years ago. 

    1.  God gave the man authority over the woman in the family.  

    2.  Men put women before God; women today choose status over love and God.  

    3.  Satan is doing the same thing with women today as he did nearly 6,000 years ago with Eve.  

    4.  We have 'moved beyond' 6,000 years of practical and successful wisdom into the realm of political correctness.  

[26]  When Jesus gave his life for us, he became the second God to be worshipped like his father Jehovah

Jesus is a mighty God, a God to be worshipped, like Jehovah. But he is not almighty God. He has been elevated from a creation to a true God.

    1.  Jesus did not deny and therefore by omission confirmed that he was a God to Thomas.  

    2.  Jesus was elevated in status from an angel to a God requiring worship.  

    3.  Jesus was was given God’s family name when he died.  

[27]   Our destiny is to become Gods like Jehovah and Jesus

Now that we know that Jesus has entered into the family name of Jehovah we can see our own future very clearly.

    1.  We are children of God.  

    2.  The true religion is presently bi-theistic. 

[28]   The 3 Master Salvation Covenants, the FRC, CRC and ARC. The 3 Blessing Covenants, the 1BC, 2BC and 3BC

Overview: The legal framework for the 3 levels of salvation of all mankind (the 3 floors in the ark) from Adam to Armageddon. 

[29]   Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the Abrahamic system mediators of the FRC, the CRC and the ARC

Overview: The legal framework for the 3 levels of salvation of mankind from Abraham to Armageddon.

[30]  The Law of Moses

The Law of Moses was not the first set of Laws that God gave to Mankind. Adam was given one rather simple Law in the Garden which he broke. Satan made all the laws for the majority of mankind from Adam down to Moses. But God stepped in at the time of Moses and gave us the Law of Moses, on 1513Sivan3 BC - see U2. This was the most comprehensive view of God's justice that mankind had ever seen. God became the physical king over his own people with the Law of Moses since it is the king that makes the laws for his people. We compare God’s justice of 3,500 years ago to today’s justice in the West.

    1.  The Law as an education in true Justice  

    2.  An eye for an eye as an upper limit for just legal penalties

    3.  Bankruptcy and the tools of your trade  

    4.  Your dwelling house should not be used as security  

    5.  Social Security but only if you work for it  

    6.  Frivolous and Opportunistic Law suits  

    7.  Can you shoot a burglar?  

    8.  Are we better off today than the Jews were under Law?  

    9.  The 12 Commandments  

  10.  The power of the Law today

[31]   The First New Covenant (1NC)

Jesus made a covenant with the 11 apostles remaining after Judas departed from the last supper. This covenant allowed the 1NC saints to eat and drink at Jesus' table in his kingdom and to sit on thrones to judge the 12 tribes of Israel in the next system. This kingdom' is Jesus' Kingdom, it is not the Kingdom of God. Jesus’ Kingdom started in 1914Tishri15 (1914October7/8) at the end of the Gentile Times - see  U123. So the 1NC saints consume in Jesus' kingdom which started in 1914 and they will rule in God's Kingdom which starts in 2008. But what does Jesus mean by: Eat and drink at my table? 

    1.  Jesus’ Kingdom  

    2.  Spiritual Food and Spiritual Drink  

    3.  Sitting on thrones to judge the 12 tribes of Israel  

[32]   What exactly is baptism?

Christian churches all over the world baptise their flocks ‘in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit’. But despite having heard or read this many times in English from Protestants and in Latin from Catholics how many times have we understood what it is saying? Never yet once since the above is an incorrect translation. It was originally corrupted by Catholic theologians to support their false trinity doctrine - see I39. Every single existing Greek Manuscript of the bible containing the verse Matthew 28:19 has the Greek word 'eiV' meaning 'into' rather than the Greek word 'en' meaning 'in'.

    1.  The Greek manuscripts and their English translations.

    2.  The incorrect translation of Matthew 28:19: ‘In the name of the father', is an action with his authority, whilst the correct translation: 'Into the name of the father' is an entry into the family name of that father.

    3.  Jesus commanded 3 different baptisms in Matthew 28.

    4.  A Baptism is a cleansing for entrance into a Covenant mediated by a Mediator whose name one is baptised into.

    5.  The disgrace of the Christian Churches and the lies and corruption of Athanasius  

[33]   The start and end of the 3 baptisms

We discovered in the previous section that there are 3 baptisms into the names of 3 mediators. But who is the Father? Who is the Son? And who is the mediator of the baptism into the name of the Holy Spirit?

    1.  The baptism into the name of the Father  

    2.  The water baptism, the holy spirit baptism, faith perfected works and works perfected faith

    3.  The baptism into the name of the Son  

    4.  The baptism into the name of the Holy Spirit  

    5.  Fathers and sons  

    6.  The righteous decree in the spirit

    7.  The righteous decree in the flesh

    8.  The 4 types of baptism

    9.  Being baptised into the name of a mediator is being washed, cleansed with his blood  

  10.  Who ransomed who?  

  11.  The salvation status of Jesus the human - Why did John baptise him?  

[35]   The Second New Covenant (2NC)

At the last supper Jesus made a new covenant with eleven of his apostles (Judas left after the meal and before Jesus made the new covenant). His mediation was that God made a with him for a kingdom and he made a covenant with the 11 for that kingdom. But was this new covenant the last covenant to be made between God and his people, Abraham's true seed, before Armageddon? In this section we consider 5 ways of seeing that there were to be more sub-covenants made after the law and the new covenant.

    1.  Jeremiah 31:31-33 and Hebrews 8

    2.  The Earthly Helper Covenant, and the second true Christian Church  

    3.  The Catholic Church Cover-up  

    4.  The word symbolic meaning of Jeremiah 31 and Hebrews 8  

    5.  Keturah - Abraham's second wife  

    6.  Leah, Bilhah, Zilpah and Rachel - The 4 wives of Jacob  

    7.  The Second New Covenant (2NC)  

     'The New Covenant' is always referred to as 'a new covenant' in the scriptures  

[37]  The Lord's Witnesses, the church of the 2NC

Every failure which one recognises is a step on the road to success. Life is about learning from mistakes. Personal Christianity is about repenting from sin. Congregational Christianity is about repenting from false church doctrine.

    1.  Faith and Reason  

    2.  Can a true church make a doctrinal or interpretational mistake?  

    3.  The LWs are the church of the 2NC.

[39]  The Top Ten Trinity Busters

The Trinity is the term employed to signify the central doctrine of the traditional Christian religion. In the words of the Athanasian Creed: "The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, and yet there are not three Gods but one God. This is illogically defined and therefore not defined and therefore non existent. For any reader trained in Pure Mathematics that is the end of the matter, there is no Trinity. But for the sake of the less logically experienced among us, please read on.

    1.  The three fundamental inconsistencies  

    2.  The Trinity is a Brainwashometer  

    
[40]  The role of women in the Christian Church

Running a good administration is about getting the basics just right, no more and no less. No church has ever done this so far. Most churches give no authority to women whatsoever. The rest of them, such as the Church of England, give them the same authority as men. Women, however, are not men. Men cannot give birth physically and likewise women cannot give birth spiritually. Women cannot baptise anyone, they cannot be priests in that sense. 

    1.  The Church should be run like a family.  

    2.  The hierarchical structure for men in the Church  

    3.  Women can be Ministerial Servants or Circuit Servants  

    4.  When a woman has authority over man's body!  

    5.  Women are not permitted to teach during a congregational meeting.  

[41]   When is abortion murder?

Everyone knows life begins biologically at conception. No one knows when biology turns into humanity. This section discovers when a body becomes a soul according to scripture.

    1.  There is no bloodguilt for murder before an embryo starts pumping blood around the brain.

    2.  There is no spirit of life from God in a fetus until it has developed nostrils 

    3.  Abortion becomes murder in the 6/7th week of pregnancy  

[42]   The real heavenly currency

Every single financial currency on earth is a valueless forgery of the true heavenly currency. 

    1.  The Heavenly Financial System  

    2.  The War on Terror, Satan's heavenly cash cow to fund Armageddon  

[43]   The Dates of Jesus’ birth and death

Newton began by dating the baptism of Christ in AD 29 during the 15th year of Tiberius Caesar.

    1.  Jesus was born on Tishri10, 2 BCE (October 9, 2BC)  

    2.  Jesus died on Good Friday, 33Nisan14 (April 1, 33AD)  

    3.  Michaelmas Day   

[44]   The Date of Armageddon without using the bible code

The Beast of Revelation 13, today, the UN. This beast has 10 horns and 7 heads. The 10 horns are 10 years of military power without kingship, and the 7 heads are 7 years of Kingship over the entire world. The UN got military power during the Gulf War, which ended in March 1991, 10 years after this is 2001 and 7 years after this is 2008. Amen. Main Themes:

    1.  What is Armageddon?

    2.  Key dates we need for the proof  

    3.  Armageddon from the corresponding ransom and the 7,000 year 'week'  

    4.  When did Adam sin?  

    5.  Armageddon from the Midst Prophecy  

[45]   The 2 presences of the Christ

Four of the disciples ask Jesus for a sign of a presence. Clearly Jesus was present when he was being asked the question, so the disciples are asking for a sign of his future presence (knowing that is going to leave them). Logic dictates that if a sign of a future presence is required, then there must be a period of absence preceding both this sign and the future presence itself. This second presence must be hard to see and missed by many of Jesus' disciples because it is not seen directly but requires a sign to identify it. 

    1.  Jesus' Comings and his Presences  

    2.  Each Presence lasts for 120 years  

    3.  Each Presence has a gap in it  

    4.  4 True Religions, 4 water baptisms, 4 sub-covenants of the ICC mediated by 4 Elijahs    

[50]   Definitions

Glossary of terms and acronyms.

[0] Why Should I study the bible? What use is that old book to me in the 21st century?

1. The Calendar

The 21st century is actually measured from the supposed birth year of Jesus, the main character of the bible. This is a testament to the enormous success of the first Christian church which became the Roman Catholic Church. No man has had a larger or longer lasting effect on mankind's history. His birth has become the pivotal point in our measurement of history. Therefore this man, Jesus, is plainly worthy of our study. 

2. Our Instruction Manual

The bible may just be the work of our creator and may therefore be the instruction manual for mankind. The Bible contains 66 books written by 40 different writers over a period of some 1600 years from 1513 BC when the sons of Israel left Egypt until around 100 AD when the apostle John died. But many of these writers claim to have written in an inspired way. Paul who wrote much of the New Testament said:

16 All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness (2 Timothy 3).

Peter, the first member of Jesus' church said...

21 For prophecy was at no time brought by man's will, but men spoke from God as they were borne along by holy spirit (2 Peter 1).

And God himself said to Moses...

12 Jehovah now said to Moses: Come up to me in the mountain and stay there, as I want to give you the stone tablets and the law and the commandment that I must write in order to teach them (Exodus 24).

Simply put the bible writers claimed to be the journalists, and represented that God was their editor. A thorough study of both the Hebrew Old Testament and the Greek New Testament reveals that the same grammatical forms exist in both languages in both testaments, although the two languages are entirely different and use entirely different alphabets. Indeed this is the basis of the bible code that we will describe later. The bible contains a consistent chronology from Adam to Armageddon. The old testament shows God in a judgemental light and the new testament shows his son, Jesus in a forgiving light. So at first sight it appears that either the bible itself is inconsistent or that God and Jesus are very different people. But St. John tells us that God is love and that Jesus is...

3 the reflection of [his] glory and the exact representation of his very being (Hebrew 1).

So how can God behave so differently between the two testaments of the holy book? The scriptural answer is that when a loving father has his children kidnapped and killed he gets very angry. But when he pays the ransom to get them back, he only wants to show them love. For in the old testament he was portraying something that he is not and in the new testament he is portraying, through Jesus Christ, everything that he truly and genuinely is. And if you love him you will see that, and if you don't, you won't.

3. Mankind has reached the point of no return

Man has now reached the point in his development where he has developed the very dangerous capability to wipe himself out in an instant. The only way to avoid this disaster is to discover and enforce a set of laws which prevent us from doing this. These laws must be timeless and must prevent us wiping ourselves out at any point in all of our future, i.e. indefinitely, or we are finished as a race. The bible claims to have such a set of rules. If this claim is true, then it holds the key to our future existence . This is plainly more worthy of our examination than say a soap opera is, at this most dangerous time in our development.

Jules Verne once said that unless mankind develops and obeys a set of rules governing the use of our technology, however unjust these rules may seem, we will annihilate ourselves. Martin Luther King described us as misguided men with guided missiles. If you agree with either of these visionaries you have good reason to study the bible in order to discover whether it has the necessary laws and the necessary guidance for mankind.

4. Do you value Love?

If you value love, then since the apostle John said that God was the very definition of Love:

8 He that does not love has not come to know God, because God is love (1 John 4).

God is obviously worth getting to know! The apostle Paul defined love explicitly as follows...

1 If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels but do not have love, I have become a sounding [piece of] brass or a clashing cymbal.
2 And if I have the gift of prophesying and am acquainted with all the sacred secrets and all knowledge, and if I have all the faith so as to transplant mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing.
3 And if I give all my belongings to feed others, and if I hand over my body, that I may boast, but do not have love, I am not
profited at all.
4 Love is long-suffering and kind. Love is not jealous, it does not brag, does not get puffed up,
5 does not behave indecently, does not look for its own interests, does not become provoked. It does not keep account of the injury.
6 It does not rejoice over unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth.
7 It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.
8 Love never fails (1 Corinthians 13).

It is more than apparent that Paul who himself said:

16 All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness (2 Timothy 3).

accredits his definition of love to God. So we now ask you to read God's definition of Love once more, and then to ask yourself: Does my love match that definition or do I have work to do? If this exercise has taught you something about yourself or about other people then the bible has already helped you and your bible study has started. If it hasn't then read the definition again. If you can formulate a better definition of love then please send it to helpdesk@lordswitnesses.com.

5. Mankind has plainly lost its way

Watching the news, it is more than apparent that mankind is in trouble. A recent UNICEF report http://www.unicefusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=duLRI8O0H&b=262152 shows that over 50% of the world's children are devastated by poverty, conflict or AIDS. It is therefore unarguable that as a group, in the majority, as a race, we have lost our way. 

The writer can assure the reader, having studied the bible for 18 years, that this book contains the solutions to all the political problems that we face today. Although these solutions are not immediately apparent. By this he does not mean that, yes the Kingdom of God, when it comes, will solve all of our problems. He means that the laws of God on justice, on love and on morality, if applied today by governments, would solve most of our problems almost immediately. The bible shows its reader just how far away our governments are taking us from justice, love and sustainable morality. Of course the politicians tell us every year that our educational standards are improving and our transportation systems are improving and our health care systems are improving and they are stamping out corruption. But the facts are very different from their assertions.

Of course it is not possible to solve all of our problems whilst in this system because mankind, and especially the politicians among us, have freewill and choose to disobey or get round or ignore even the best worded laws and constitutions. 

The point is that there is a set of laws and a method of government that truly gives freedom and justice to everyone. It creates a society where...

25 And Judah and Israel continued to dwell in security, everyone under his own vine and under his own fig tree, from Dan to Beer-Sheba, all the days of Solomon (1 Kings 4).

21 And they will certainly build houses and have occupancy; and they will certainly plant vineyards and eat [their] fruitage.
22 They will not build and someone else have occupancy; they will not plant and someone else do the eating. For like the days of a tree will the days of my people be; and the work of their own hands my chosen ones will use to the full (Isaiah 65).

It is our endeavour to present to you, from the bible, this minimum set of laws, that achieves the above and that prevents us from destroying ourselves. Mankind cannot fully implement these laws in this system of things, because even these perfect laws cannot be fully effective unless people freely choose to obey them out of wisdom or love for God or love of man. But in the next system, the Kingdom of God that we all pray for in the Lord's prayer, only people who have made that choice in one way or another will participate. The rest of us will sit out some or all of that system in a sin bin, learning by observation, but not being allowed to participate and screw that system up like we have screwed this system up!

Banks have now shown us conclusively that self interest is ultimately self defeating. The housing crises in the US and in the UK have shown us that any economy based upon usury (giving banks the power to throw women and children out of their homes and on to the street) will end up in ruin. Global warming is showing us the futility of self interest as the west and now the east put their immediate profit and immediate comfort ahead of the future survival of the planet and therefore of their own children. The bible is the text book on sustainable morality. It contains the minimum set of rules necessary for a society of free willed beings to avoid self destruction. If understood, digested and followed then mankind would have a future. But we have spectacularly failed to consider our instruction manual (as is the way these days with all equipment manuals). So right now we have no future unless God steps in. But the good news is that he will step in, for that is his job.

6.  Gratitude to God 

Gratitude is in short supply these days. If you believe that God might just have created you and your loved ones and this planet, and your capacity to love, to breathe and to dream things up in your imagination, then plainly you owe him a debt of thanks. Obviously the way to express gratitude to a parent is to listen to him/her. As Samuel God's prophet once said...

22 Does Jehovah have as much delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices as in obeying the voice of Jehovah? Look! To obey is better than a sacrifice, to pay attention than the fat of rams (1 Samuel 15).

The way we pay attention to God is by reading his book and by attempting to understand what he is telling us. 

7.  Gratitude to Jesus 

It is a historical fact recorded not only in the bible but also by the Roman historian, Tacitus, that Jesus was executed by the Romans. The recent success of Mel Gibson's over realistic film proves that many of us have gratitude for what Jesus did for us. The 4 gospels are compulsory reading for anyone who wants to express that gratitude by learning from the greatest teacher who ever lived.

[1] There is a God - His name is Jehovah

The existence of a God is perceived by many people to be rather inconvenient. They do not want to be responsible to yet another authority figure. They do not want to have to obey yet another set of rules or to feel any more guilt than they presently bear. They do not want to have their lifestyle cramped by religious restrictions. They want to be free. But these people do not yet understand meaning of the words of Jesus...

31 And so Jesus went on to say to the Jews that had believed him: If you remain in my word, you are really my disciples
32 and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free (John 8).

For until we grasp the basic set of laws that ensures our continued existence, we are slaves to sin, we are slaves of our own unrighteous desires, we our slaves of our bellies, slaves to inherited belief systems, slaves of our egos, slaves of our status and in fact slaves to death because our society and we ourselves have no future without acceptance of a set of rules which prevent us from destroying ourselves. True freedom comes from knowing what game we are actually playing and knowing what the rules of that game are.

In a survey conducted just after 911, 90% of Pakistanis conveniently believed that Muslims were not responsible for the twin towers atrocity. As late as July 2005 the American government conveniently maintained that Global warming is not being caused by the burning of fossil fuels (in particular by huge american motor cars). This is because most humans prefer a convenient lie to an inconvenient truth. Following 7/7 British tabloid newspapers trumpeted the new policy of shoot to kill all terrorist suspects only to find that the police have pumped 8 bullets into an innocent Brazilian electrician - without warning. These newspapers choose to trample on the rights of olive skinned electricians because they want to believe that the rights of 60 million British Citizens are larger than the right of one Brazilian. But plainly they are not. The rights of a group of people are entirely independent of the number of people in that group. 

If this were not the case then we would all be sleeping with Julia Roberts because there are more men in the group who want to do that that there are Danny Moders. Alternatively all PC owners would just help themselves to Bill Gates' money since there are more of us than there are of him. Actually this throwing away of human rights is beginning to sound rather attractive! But seriously we have no future without human rights and these come from a set of laws which preserve both us and our society. So however convenient or attractive it may be to believe that the mob has more rights than the individual, such a belief is a lie.

So believing in God is not merely a matter of logic, it is a matter of mental sincerity. It is a matter of mental courage. A courage which enables us to search for the truth without regard for the consequences that this truth may have for us. This kind of courage is facilitated by a faith which tells us that if there is a God, he must be a good chap, with quite a sense of humour! 

We therefore suggest that the reader takes the following view: I will find out if there is a God and find out what he wants from me and what he will do for me first. I will worry about the consequences to my financial status, my attractiveness to the opposite sex and my lifestyle second, once I know what the costs are and what the benefits are.

In economic terms, you cannot do a cost benefit analysis of believing in God until you know both the cost and the benefit. The world's organised religions have done a pretty good job of making the costs look high and the benefits look childishly naive and unrealistic. But organised religion has an agenda, just like a business or a government. Most Churches, most public sector bodies and most larger companies all have this one thing in common. They hide the truth from you and feed you want they want you to believe. A wise and probably corrupt Nigerian politician once said:

There are two reasons why a man does something. There is the reason he tells you he is doing it and there is the real reason why he is doing it.

Here is a table of some obvious examples of the cover stories that people use... 

Some of the guesses at the real reasons may be wrong of course. But we could spend the rest of our lives compiling such a table. The point is that we must look underneath the surface representations in order to find the truth. And most surface representations are not the truth, or not the whole truth at any rate. The truth is more often than not suppressed, and the more valuable that truth is, the deeper it is buried. This is the doublethink of George Orwell's 1984. The reader will hopefully know or will at least now realise that the whole political religious and economic system of this world is based upon the above inside/outside methodology.

The most scandalous suppression of the truth in biblical code terms that the writer has ever seen is the teaching of Newton's laws of motion in every school in the West without ever mentioning that Newton spent almost half of his life trying to decode not the solar system but the bible. Sir Isaac Newton would have been hauled up before the court of convocation had he published his decoding works whilst he was alive, due to church inspired persecution. So he had them published after he died. He wrote "Observations on the prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John" (Kessenger). But why are we continuing the censorship of 17th century churches, today?

Sir Isaac Newton, possibly the greatest mind of the last millennium, believed that the bible was written in a code and spent almost half of his life trying to decode it. Men have landed on the moon using equations which he formulated without ever leaving the ground. We would be foolish not to investigate his biblical research. We would be foolish not to investigate his premise that the bible is indeed written in a code. 

1. Newton's Orrery.

'Newton showed his Orrery to Halley the atheist, who was charmed with the contrivance, and asked the name of the maker: Nobody, was the ad hominem retort'

And perhaps now the reader can truly understand the meaning of the famous words of Jesus Christ:

8 Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God (Matthew 5:8).

2. God is the Poet of our DNA

There was a BBC2 Learning Zone program on UK TV, about mapping the whole human genome. It was shown on Friday 24th October, 2003 at 2:00 am. In it a Professor from London University said that knowing the whole human genome is like knowing every word in a Shakespearian sonnet, but the trouble he had was that he did not know the grammar of the genome which gives him the order of the words, so he could not read or write one line of poetry in the sonnet of life. But his very words show that there must be a genetic poet, a greater Shakespeare, whose poetry we are. 

In fact modern genetics acknowledges that there is a grammar to the genetic code with certain genes controlling macro body part positioning etc. So much so that humans have over 50% of the genetic material of a Banana, and the same genes control the same thing in entirely different animals. Geneticists describe this phenomenon as nature being 'lazy'. But it is nothing of the sort, a random process cannot possibly be lazy, it has to try every possible combination all the time. Random processes are the precise opposite of Lazy. Laziness proves that DNA was not created by random chance. Evolution cannot have a grammar, and can never be lazy, it is merely the application of random chance to a vocabulary and the discarding of all the failures. So the existence of a universal genetic grammar of life that defines the way the genetic vocabulary is always put together necessitates an intelligent poet or a creator. Random processes cannot have grammar, which is structure. The grammar of our DNA is like the car manual for the owner of a car. One cannot create of fix a car without knowing how to put all of the components together. But car manuals are read by intelligent beings, they would not be needed if cars had been created by random chance and evolution. So since DNA has a grammar a construction manual, it must have had an intelligent designer using it.

The other obvious clue is that the Genetic Code is digital and mankind now processes nearly all information digitally. So we are using the same techniques as nature. But mankind did not stumble across the digital age by random chance, we invented it using our intelligence. So how can we believe that nature has no designer?

2a. Psalm 139 prophesies DNA 3,000 years before it was discovered

How did the Psalmist King David know, 3000 years before Crick and Watson discovered the structure of DNA that God had written all our parts down in a book before we were formed?

16 Your eyes saw even the embryo of me, and in your book all its parts were down in writing,
As regards the days when they were formed, and there was not yet one among them (Psalm 139).

How did king David know that the entire structure of a human being exists in a book before any one part comes to be formed? Psalm 139 defines DNA. How did he know that God encodes the whole structure of us somewhere at the time of gestation [the days when our parts are formed]? Our DNA is a 3 billion letter 'book' of God.

2b. The compactness of human DNA

Our genetic code consists of 3 billion 2 bit words (4 possibilities, Adenine, Guamine, Cytosine or Thiamine). Microsoft Windows Vista consists of 12 billion 8 bit words (called Bytes). So God encoded the plans and self building capability for an entire human being, some of whom had the misfortune to work on Microsoft Windows Vista, in one 16th of the space that Microsoft used to encode the capability to open a word document, play a movie, and surf the internet for a few hours before committing 200 illegal operations and being closed down.

The progam code of Microsoft Windows Vista is 16 times larger than the genetic code of a human. This means that the writer of human DNA (be it nature or God) is thousands of times more intelligent than Bill Gates. Because it is relatively easy to write spaghetti code, but it is the height of intellectual dexterity to write concise compact computer code. The writer runs a software company and has written a fair amount of computer code himself, so he knows this first hand. The compactness of code is directly related to the intelligence of the writer of that code. Since nature has no intelligence, the compactness of human DNA is an absolute proof that there is a God, who is way smarter than Bill Gates. Had nature encoded human DNA using a random process, the length of that code would have been unthinkably large and certainly billions of times larger than Microsoft Windows Vista.

To paraphrase Isaac Newton: How did blind chance create the human eye and from whence did it calculate its refraction?

3. I think therefore I was created by an intelligence

Humans did ‘evolve’ but by the design process of angels, rather than by random chance. For chance, an unthinking statistical phenomenon, cannot logically create a thinking being. Only intelligence begets intelligence. Descartes said: I think therefore I am. But one could equally well say: I think, therefore I was created by a thinker.

The intelligent man says: I think therefore I was created by an intelligence.

How many computers, devices with some limited intelligence, did random chance ever create?

But mankind has never created anything with emotion. So really the more powerful statement is: I want therefore I am.

And from a creation standpoint: I want so someone wanted to create me.

Thought begets thought and emotion begets emotion. Random chance has neither of these two necessary capabilities for a creator of mankind.

4. The Historicity of Key Bible Characters

Jesus himself is referred to by 3 Roman Historians, Cornelius Tacitus, Gaius Suetonius and Pliny the Younger. In 1961 a stone was found in Caesarea with an inscription naming Pontius Pilate who finally consented to the execution of Jesus. The bones of the high priest Joseph Caiaphas, were discovered in a ossuary in 1990. Josephus, the Jewish Historian who lived at the time of the birth of Christianity refers to Jesus twice. There is much more information on this subject available from websites such as www.issuesetc.org/resource/archives/maier3.htm.

5. Jesus Christ fulfilled a large number of prophecies recorded before he appeared

The old testament prophesies many things about a Messiah who will come and save the sons of Israel. We are going to list many of these prophecies and show that the man known as Jesus Christ actually fulfilled them. One can argue that many of these are simply the bible proving the bible as it were. However Christ was a real historic person as witnessed to by the Roman historian Tacitus, and by the Jewish historian Josephus, who started life as the general in charge of the Army of Israel and ended life as a Historian and as a Christian. So if you propose that the New Testament is a dishonest fabrication by 4 colluding gospel writers and a few assorted apostles, then the most prominent Jewish Historian of the time would certainly disagree, and he was actually there. 

Furthermore that is no other candidate the even comes close to fulfilling the old testament criteria for being the Messiah other than Jesus.

Of course it is possible for anyone to fulfill one or two of these prophecies, but to fulfill the large number of them that Jesus himself fulfilled proves that the old testament prophets did have a knowledge of the future and that Jesus Christ was the Messiah as he claimed.

Once we have proven that the old testament prophets did have a knowledge of the future, then it is apparent that there is someone else who gave them that knowledge, since no human can foresee the future. Knowing the future is a capability that God claims for himself...

10 The One telling from the beginning the finale, and from long ago the things that have not been done; the One saying, 'My own counsel will stand, and everything that is my delight I shall do' (Isaiah 46).

So we are proving that there is a God by proving that the old testament has foreknowledge that can only have come from God. In fact the New Testament is the fulfillment of the old testament and the resolution of sins exposed by the law of Moses.

Prophecy: 14 Therefore Jehovah himself will give you men a sign: Look! The virgin [hml(h means virgin or unmarried maiden according to Ben Davidson, it is from a Hebrew root meaning hidden, which relates to virginity] herself will actually become pregnant, and she is giving birth to a son, and she will certainly call his name Immanuel (Isaiah 7).

Fulfillment: 24 Then Joseph woke up from his sleep and did as the angel of Jehovah had directed him, and he took his wife home. But he had no intercourse with her, until she gave birth to a son, and he called his name Jesus (Matthew 1).

A virgin birth is quite a fulfilment. Of course the skeptic might argue that virgin births are a bit difficult to confirm in the absence of DNA testing, which wasn't invented in the first century. However the academic would say we now know how a virgin birth could take place scientifically. We actually do virgin births ourselves today in fertility clinics. So the bible certainly prophesied this capability, which we call in vitro fertilisation, 2,600 years before it ever occurred. 

The reader may be wondering why does Jesus have this other name Immanuel? We answer this question in section I17.

Prophecy: 1 In the region of the Jordan, Galilee of the nations.
2 The people that were walking in the darkness have seen a great light (Isaiah 9).

Fulfillment: 13 Further, after leaving Nazareth, he came and took up residence in Capernaum beside the sea [of Galilee] in the districts of Zebulun and Naphtali,
14 that there might be fulfilled what was spoken through Isaiah the prophet, saying:
15 O land of Zebulun and land of Naphtali, along the road of the sea, on the other side of the Jordan, Galilee of the nations!
16 the people sitting in darkness saw a great light (Matthew 4).

Prophecy: 2 And you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah, the one too little to get to be among the thousands of Judah, from you there will come out to me the one who is to become ruler in Israel, whose origin is from early times, from the days of time indefinite (Micah 5).

Fulfillment: 1 After Jesus had been born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, look! astrologers from eastern parts came to Jerusalem (Matthew 2).

He entered the temple on 33Nisan10, palm Sunday, on the very day when the passover lamb should enter the house according to the law of Moses. And Jesus was referred to by John the baptist as the lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world.

He was killed on good Friday, 33April1, 33Nisan14, the very day of the passover, when the passover lamb should be killed.

Not a bone of his body was broken (The Passover lamb law and Psalm 22:17, John 19:32,33).
They cast lots over his garments (Psalm 22:18, John 19:23,24).
He said Eli, Eli, Lama Sabbachthani when he died (Psalm 22:1). 

46 About the ninth hour Jesus called out with a loud voice, saying: Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is, My God, my God, why have you forsaken me? (Matthew 27).

The crowds said at his death: He committed himself to Jehovah, let him provide him with escape (Psalm 22:8, Matthew 27:43).
He opened his mouth with illustrations, he published things hidden since the founding (Psalm 78:1,2 - LXX, Matthew 13:35).
He rode into Jerusalem on an Ass and was hailed as the son of David (who would become the King - Zechariah 9:9, Matthew 21:5).
He was betrayed for 30 pieces of silver, which were thrown into the temple treasury (Zechariah 11:13, Matthew 27:3-5).
He preached the good news of the Kingdom to the poor (Isaiah 61:1, Luke 4:18).
Zealous for Jehovah’s house  (Psalm 69:9, John 2:15-17).
Given vinegar (Psalm 69:21, Mark 15,36).
Pierced (Isaiah 53:9, John 19:34).

The chances of all of the above being a coincidence are so remote as to make the existence of God and the truthfulness and prophetic power of the bible proven beyond any reasonable doubt.

6. The Old Testament wisdom and non messianic prophecy

1. The old testament makes this prophecy concerning Abraham...

16 And I will constitute your seed like the dust particles of the earth, so that, if a man could be able to count the dust particles of the earth, then your seed could be numbered (Genesis 13).

Today there are billions of people who claim a genetic or a spiritual descendancy from Abraham, be they Jews, Muslims of Christians. In fact nearly 50% of mankind would claim such a descendancy.

2. The bible reveals the concept of quarantine, in the law of Moses, 3400 years before microbiology discovered bugs.

3 And the priest must look at the plague in the skin of the flesh. When the hair in the plague has turned white and the appearance of the plague is deeper than the skin of his flesh, it is the plague of leprosy. And the priest must look at it, and he must declare him unclean.
4 But if the blotch is white in the skin of his flesh and its appearance is not deeper than the skin and its hair has not turned white, the priest must then quarantine the plague 7 days.
5 And the priest must look at him on the seventh day, and if in the way it looks the plague has stopped, the plague has not spread in the skin, the priest must also quarantine him another 7 days (Leviticus 13).

This was legal isolation and inspection for protection from an infectious desease (a plague).

3.  The bible describes the in vitro fertilisation of Mary 1,960 years before IVF was invented by man.  Even if you do not believe that Mary conceived without sleeping with a man, the account nonetheless demonstrates that an external species had an understanding of this process over 1,900 years before mankind developed the process for itself.

18 But the birth of Jesus Christ was in this way. During the time his mother Mary was promised in marriage to Joseph, she was found to be pregnant by holy spirit before they were united (Matthew 1).

4   The bible describes the earth as circular 2,000 years before we realised that it wasn't flat, but was a Globe. 

22 There is one who is dwelling above the circle of the earth, the dwellers in which are as grasshoppers, the one who is stretching out the heavens just as a fine gauze, who spreads them out like a tent in which to dwell (Isaiah 40).

So the bible is inspired by a scientifically more advanced species than us.

5. The bible describes the earth as being hung upon nothing, 3300 years before Sir Isaac Newton discovered Gravity.

7 He is stretching out the north over the empty place, hanging the earth upon nothing (Job 26).

6. The bible described the universe as expanding, 3300 years (Job), 3000 years (Psalms) and 2700 years (Isaiah), before Fred Hoyle discovered that it was, in the 20th century...

7 He is saying to the sun that it should not shine forth, And around stars he puts a seal,
8 Stretching out the heavens by himself. And treading upon the high waves of the sea.
9 Making the Ash constellation, the Kesil constellation, and the Kimah constellation and the interior rooms of the South.
10 Doing great things unsearchable, and wonderful things without number.
11 Look! He passes by me and I do not see [him] (Job 9).

2 Enwrapping yourself with light as with a garment, Stretching out the heavens like a tent cloth,
3 The One building his upper chambers with beams in the very waters,
Making the clouds his chariot, Walking upon the wings of the wind,
4 Making his angels spirits. His ministers a devouring fire.
5 He has founded the earth upon its established places. It will not be made to totter to time indefinite, or forever (Psalm 104).

22 There is one who is dwelling above the circle of the earth, the dwellers in which are as grasshoppers, the one who is stretching out the heavens just as a fine gauze, who spreads them out like a tent in which to dwell (Isaiah 40).

Some tent!

7. Evolution vs Creation

The first thing to say is that evolution is not a fact. It is rather a theory, which was first postulated by Charles Darwin. He observed little birds, Finches, with 14 different types of beak on the Galapagos Islands. He then returned home in his ship called the Beagle and thought nothing much of it. However once he was back in Cambridge he spoke to John Gould, an ornithologist, a bird expert, who told him that these 14 differing beaked birds were in fact, 14 different species (14 different breeding groups). This changed everything for Darwin. He then proposed that the differing environmental conditions on the different islands had lead to the changes in these Finches and to these 14 new species developing. He then generalised this to cover the origin of all species on the earth which he claimed resulted from environmental pressure, a force which he termed natural selection. This was his theory on the 'Origin of the Species'.

The definition of 'Species' used in Darwin's day was: Breeding Group, a group of animals who could breed with each other. 

In this way these species were a partition of nature, dividing all living things into breeding groups. So John Gould was telling him that these 14 differing finches, with different beaks could not interbreed with each other.

The whole of Darwin's theory was based on the 14 different species assertion from John Gould. But how would John Gould know if these Finches could breed with each other or not when he himself had never been to the Galapagos Islands and when we don't even know that today?

Nicholas Wade of the New York Times

"When Charles Darwin landed in the Galapagos Islands on Sept. 17, 1835, he paid little attention to the finches, which seemed much the same from one island to another. He assumed they were varieties of a single species that had reached the remote islands long before and thought no more about them until after the British ship Beagle returned to London.

There, John Gould, a leading ornithologist, told him that the finches belonged to many different species, none known from anywhere else. The surprising news helped set off in Darwin’s mind the train of thought that led him to the daring conclusion that the earth’s species might not have remained fixed and unchangeable since some moment of divine creation.

The finches of the Galapagos Islands have become a foremost example of evolution at work. They display what biologists call adaptive radiation, the evolution of a funding population into an array of different species, each adapted to its own ecological niche.

Biologists now have applied modern methods of DNA analysis to Darwin’s finches. Not surprisingly – for Darwin was almost always right, though he knew of neither genes nor DNA – they have found that the finches are all descended from a single ancestral species.

There are 14 species of Darwin’s finches – 13 on the Galapagos Islands, which lie some 600 miles west of Ecuador, and one on Cocos Island to the north of the Galapagos. The little birds look very similar, but each species gets its food in a different way with a beak adapted to its special needs.

The cactus ground finches have long beaks for eating seeds and cactus pulp. The sharp-beaked ground finch picks ticks off iguanas. The woodpecker finch wields a cactus spine with its chisel-shaped beak to force insects out of cracks. The strange vegetarian finch eats only buds, blossoms and fruit with its stubby beak. The array of beaks is "the most famous tool kit in the natural world," Jonathan Weiner wrote in "The Beak of the Finch."

The most likely ancestor of the famous finches, the biologists write in the current issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, was a bird known as the dull-colored grassquit. The first species to evolve from the grassquit line was the warbler finch, followed by the vegetarian finch. The family tree then bushes out into the six species of ground finch and the six tree finches. The Cocos finch turns out to be closely related to the tree finches, showing the Cocos Islands were colonized from the Galapagos.

The biologists, a team led by Jan Klein of the Max Planck Institute for Biology in Tubingen, Germany, say that with the DNA region they analyzed, a segment of what is known as mitochondrial DNA, they could not distinguish among the species of ground finch, suggesting the different species may continue to interbreed. The same was true of the tree finch species. Speciation, the process that led Darwin to his theory of evolution, may still be in progress among the Galapagos finches." Nicholas Wade (from The New York Times, May 11, 1999, page F5)

So Jan Klein and his team have discovered that the 6 ground finch 'species' probably have the same Mitochondrial DNA (the Mitochondria are the components of cells which generate energy, the DNA is our Genetic Code - The DNA in the Mitochondria carries the genetic code for the whole Finch!). Since these 6 finch 'species' have the same DNA they 'may continue to interbreed'. But this means that they may in fact be one species, according to the definition of a species in Darwin's day. Next the team discovered that the 6 tree Finch 'species' also have identical Mitochondial DNA, which also means that they 'may continue to interbreed', and so they may also be one species. They then discovered that all of the supposed 14 'species' of Finch are descended from a single 'ancestral species'. The question that is therefore begging to be asked is: Can all these 14 different types of Finch still interbreed with the ancestral species? If they can, then what Jan Klein has found is that all 14 types of Finch with their different beaks are in fact one species, and that John Gould, mislead Charles Darwin when he told him that all the 14 types of Finch were from different species. If so then Darwin's origin of the species is an extrapolation from a false premise.

And if even today, leading biologists do not know whether these various beaked finches can interbreed with each other, how on earth did John Gould know in 1835 that they could not? He must have just been guessing, which brings us back to Churchill's wisdom:

'A lie gets half way round the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on' - Winston Churchill

One has to wonder why no body of scientists has ever been interested enough to find out if they can interbreed? This must be the longest ever running theory that has never been scientifically tested. Even Einstein’s theories, which are far more complex and obscure than two mating finches, have been experimentally verified. Psychologically one is forced to conclude that no scientist wants to discover the awful truth that the whole theory may be based on a false assumption. We appear to need a scientific deep throat! 

Richard Milton's exposee

"On this key issue, Jonathan Weiner seems entirely unconscious of the scientific significance of his own reporting. In his Pulitzer Prize winning book, The Beak of the Finch, he wrote; 'Back in 1983, for instance ... a male cactus finch on Daphne Major, a scandens, courted a female fortis. This was a pair of truly star crossed lovers. They were not just from opposite sides of the tracks, like the Prince and the Showgirl, or from two warring families, like Romeo and Juliet: they belonged to two different species. Yet during the chaos of the great flood, they mated and produced four chicks in one brood.'

Not only did the finches in question mate successfully, their offspring proved to be among the most fertile that the Grants recorded during their twenty years on the islands. The four chicks of this mating produced no less than 46 grandchildren.

The Grants recorded many other pairings of 'different species' of finch, which, like Lack before them, they dubbed 'hybrids'. But of course the central significance of this finding is that the identification of the thirteen varieties as different species is impossible to maintain once it is admitted that they can interbreed and produce fertile young.

The fact that different varieties prefer not to mate is very different from saying that they are unable to do so. Great Danes do not usually select toy poodles as potential mates (and vice versa) but they are capable of bearing fertile young if mated and are members of the same species, Canis familiaris. Arab stallions do not normally select Shetland ponies as mates, but they are members of the same species, Equus callabus.

Moreover, the Grants' observations undermine another myth about Darwin's finches - that individual species are 'confined to certain islands'. In order for different species to mate, they clearly have to occupy the same territory. Other visitors to the Galapagos have confirmed that this is this case. Television documentary filmmaker Gillian Brown spent a year working at the Darwin Research Station on the islands. It is common, says Brown, to find the different species all over the archipelago, rather than obeying the colored territorial maps drawn up by Darwinist ornithologists." Our sincere thanks to  www.alternativescience.com/darwin's_finches.htm

So in 1983, the Grants, a husband and wife scientist pair, went to the Galapagos Islands and saw two supposedly different species of Finch interbreed of their own volition. They produced 4 babies which then went on to produce 46 grandchildren. This means that these two finches were in fact in the same species. So John Gould was wrong and Darwin's theory of evolution, his origin of the species, should therefore have been a theory on the genetic flexibility of the beak in the Finch species. Of course the Pulitzer prize winning book that describes these things (The Beak of the Finch) cites the above as evidence that speciation (the evolutionary process by which a species comes into existence), is still occurring in the Galapagos Islands. But Darwin's theory was called the Origin of the Species, not the beginning of speciation. The premise for his theory was that these finches were not in the same species. Plainly they are and his premise was false, and hence his theory has no basis. All that originated on the Galapagos islands were different geometries of beaks of Finches in the same species. Darwin did not observe anything more than one species.

With the above DNA evidence and breeding observations of the Grants, we are able to reject Darwin's theory on the origin of the species, because there is good evidence that no species of Finch other than your basic Finch species has ever originated in the Galapagos Islands, since the Finches interbreed and have identical mitochondrial DNA, but obviously they have different beak DNA. 

So instead, as in the case of the domestic dog, which can still breed with the wolf (in theory), we propose that these 14 types of Finch are merely a manifestation of the genetic flexibility of the Finch species. In the case of the dog, the selection process was the desire of the owner, and in the case of the Finch, the selection process was the design of the Island.

It really is absolutely incredible that scientists can accept that all of the breeds of dogs and horses which come in bodies of vastly different shape and size are in the same species. Yet when it comes to Finches in the Galapagos islands, even the slightest variation in beak size means that they are in a different species. Unless of course these Finches are breeding with their beaks !

But we do know that Beagles and Poodles and Bull Terriers can breed with Alsatians and Great Danes and Labradors. And these dogs are animals which differ in a lot more than merely their mouths. 

In fact if Darwin had only looked at the species which his ship was named after, he would surely have realised that John Gould was likely to have been mistaken !!

We propose that Darwin was correct in his deduction that the different environments of the various islands lead to the 14 different types of beak, but that Gould was guessing and he was wrong in his assertion that the 14 different beaked birds were from 14 different species. All of these Finches were still your basic Finch species, not withstanding their finely tuned new beaks. We propose that the same enormous genetic flexibility built into the Wolf and manifested in the various breeds of Dog, was also built into the Finch and manifested in the various types of beak. In the case of Dogs the selection was human, by their breeders, in the case of Finches, the selection was natural, by their environments.

We are saying that, all of the variations which are exhibited and all the adaptations that the species makes in every environment, such as colouring, size, forms of viruses, etc., were also created by God, through the angels and preprogrammed into the species from the outset as the genetic variational capability, or genetic flexibility, or genetically preprogrammed adaptability of that species.

We are saying that it is the genetic flexibility of a species which enables it to adapt. Adaptation is not caused by a series of billions and billions of random mutations one of which by some incredible fluke cause some advantage to the animal, and then all of the ones that did not cause this advantage die out and vanish from the fossil record leaving only the one that worked. For this to have occurred one would have to apply natural selection not only to the mutations themselves but also to their dead fossils!

If the reader has ever tried to create anything himself then he will know that perhaps one in ten or perhaps one in twenty of his ideas turn out to be any good. This is creation with the intelligence of a human. If nature was the result of absolutely no intelligence whatsoever, then there would be billions and billions of mistakes for every success. The fossil record would just be a random mess of genetic misfits. There would be billions of failed horses for every horse. But this is just not seen. In fact it is quite the contrary. There are no mistakes at all. Every animal got it right first time! This is because God is more intelligent than humans and we would be very surprised if the angels did not simulate every animal on a heavenly computer before they created them anyway. Look! it was the angels who created all of these animals! Not the National Lottery. Who created the animals in Star Wars?

Natural selection cannot create anything, it can only destroy. And random chance is just not a candidate. Consider for example the little bacteria that infect us. How can it be that within just a few years of our finding an antibiotic that wipes them out, they have found a way to beat the antibiotic by 'mutating'?

There is nowhere near enough time for random chance to create the perfect mutation to get round the antibiotic discovered in the last decade, and create a new super bug resistant to that very antibiotic. Although there could be hundreds of millions of reproductions in ten years for bacteria.

When we battle with these bugs we are not fighting against random chance, we are fighting against the minds of the angels who created them with different form capabilities. These different forms are a part of the bacterium's genetic defenses. This is even more true in the case of the viruses, which are basically just DNA with an outer coating. The Flu virus changes all the time, this is not a series of incredibly fortunate mutations. It is the genetic cycle of the DNA. This is well known in the case of viruses by the medical profession. Why don't we apply it to the rest of nature and realise that adaptation to environments is as a result of designed-in genetic flexibility.

Look! just as a fly changes its course every few seconds to avoid being caught, so a virus changes its shape every few years or every few months or every few days to avoid being caught by our immune system.

Consider for example the arctic reindeer and the regular reindeer. The arctic one has a whole load more hair than the regular one and shorter legs, so it is better at dealing with the cold. Did the normal reindeer go north, and get cold and then suffer billions of random mutations one of which lead to longer hair and another of which lead to shorter legs? Did a process of natural selection then result in the better insulated reindeers out performing the regular reindeers in the arctic and the billions of billions of randomly mutated genetic failures with two heads, three tails, four kidneys, no kidneys at all, three legs, half a brain, no hair whatsoever, hair on one side of the body but not the other, two hairy legs and two bald legs, one hairy antler and one bald antler, antlers for legs, legs for antlers etc, all of which vanished without a trace from the fossil record? Were we then left with the arctic reindeer perfectly adapted only because we had randomly tried every other possible combination of reindeer and failed and been naturally selected against in the order of billions of billions? 

This is a ridiculous theory. If one was a regular reindeer and one saw ones relatives going through such a ludicrous series of genetic mutations one would have gone back south without delay! Is it not far simpler to accept that the creator of the regular reindeer had some knowledge of the weather conditions on the planet which he himself had created, and so he built in to the reindeer species the genetic variational capability to grow longer hair and shorter legs, if the conditions so required?

17 It was you that set up all the boundaries of the earth; Summer and winter--you yourself formed them (Psalm 74).

For more on this intelligent design versus random chance debate we must recommend the 'Privileged Planet' and 'Unlocking the Mystery of Life', DVDs from illustra Media available in the US from www.illustramedia.com, and in the UK from www.apologetics.com. 

8. The Bible says that there is a God, our creator, called Jehovah

A little too obvious perhaps but...

60 to the end that all the peoples of the earth may know that Jehovah is the [true] God. There is no other (1 Kings 8).

10 You are my witnesses, is the utterance of Jehovah, even my servant whom I have chosen, in order that you may know and have faith in me, and that you may understand that I am the same One. Before me there was no God formed, and after me there continued to be none (Isaiah 43).

18 For this is what Jehovah has said, the Creator of the heavens. He the [true] God, the Former of the earth and the Maker of it.. He the One who firmly established it, who did not create it simply for
nothing, who formed it even to be inhabited: I am Jehovah, and there is no one else (Isaiah 45).

Now you might argue, yes fine, but how do we know that Isaiah and Samuel (who wrote Kings) were not lying? Well, the bible contains a set of moral laws which have never been successfully improved upon by mankind, although many have tried, so how likely is it that a book containing such far-sighted morality was written by liars?

Today we are not entirely sure how to pronounce God's name. It might be Jehovah, it might be Yahveh, no one would appear to know. We know the 4 Hebrew consonants of his name, which are Yod, Hey, Vuv, Hey, hwhy  (Hebrew reads from right to left). But we do not know the vowels of his name.

9. Signs in the heavens and on the earth

The Sun is 400x larger than the moon and is 400x further away from the earth than the moon. This is the statistically incedible coincidence that causes a lunar and solar eclipse. Why do these two critical heavenly bodies fit over each other from our standpoint?

Every animal with a heart has a lifespan of near enough 1 billions beats, no matter how fast thier heart beats. So much so that biologists have incorporated this feature in a formula...

Life expectancy =  1902.6 / heart rate (beat per minute)

Here are some well known examples...

[2] Why did God create the angels? Why did he create the universe? Why did he create us?

These questions are obviously very deep, and the answers are very hard to derive from the scriptures. But once they have been derived, the answers are very simple. Even if the reader finds this section hard going, the conclusions are easy to digest.

What are the angels like?

Please peruse the following scriptures to get the flavour of what our brothers the angels are like and what they are doing for us and against us.

6 But a certain witness has given proof somewhere, saying: What is man that you keep him in mind, or [the] son of man that you take care of him?
7 You made him a little lower than angels; with glory and honor you crowned him, and appointed him over the works of your hands (Hebrews 2).

1 Now it came to be the day when the sons of the [true] God entered to take their station before Jehovah, and even Satan
proceeded to enter right among them.
2 Then Jehovah said to Satan: Where do you come from? At that Satan answered Jehovah and said: From roving about in the earth and from walking about in it.
3 And Jehovah went on to say to Satan: Have you set your heart upon my servant Job, that there is no one like him in the earth, a man blameless and upright, fearing God and turning aside from bad? Even yet he is holding fast his integrity, although you incite me against him to swallow him up without cause.
4 But Satan answered Jehovah and said: "Skin in behalf of skin, and everything that a man has he will give in behalf of his soul.
5 For a change, thrust out your hand, please, and touch as far as his bone and his flesh [and see] whether he will not curse you to your very face.
6 Accordingly Jehovah said to Satan: There he is in your hand! Only watch out for his soul itself! (Job 2).

7 Also, with reference to the angels he says: And he makes his angels spirits, and his public servant a flame of fire (Hebrews 1).

53 Or do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father to supply me at this moment more than 12 legions of angels? (Matthew 26).

7 And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels battled with the dragon, and the dragon and its angels battled (Revelation 12).

35 And it came about on that night that the angel of Jehovah proceeded to go out and strike down 185,000 in the camp of the Assyrians. When people rose up early in the morning, why, there all of them were dead carcasses (2 Kings 19).

The scriptures above show that there are some spirit creatures trying to damage us and others trying to help us. These two groups are fighting each other over us. The ones trying to ruin us are the demons and are lead by Satan. The ones trying to help us are the angels who are lead by Michael. Popular mythology and many Hollywood blockbusters are built upon this invisible spiritual reality. The reader may not yet understand that the vast majority of angels, rather like the vast majority of mankind, are neither super righteous nor super wicked, but are somewhere in between. The scriptural evidence for this is somewhat symbolic...

40 And there are heavenly bodies, and earthly bodies; but the glory of the heavenly bodies is one sort, and that of the earthly bodies is a different sort.
41 The glory of the sun [Jesus] is one sort, and the glory of the moon [Satan] is another, and the glory of the stars [the angels] is another; in fact, star differs from star in glory (1 Corinthians 15).

And most stars are not even visible to the naked eye!

7 Also, with reference to the angels he says: And he makes his angels spirits, and his public servants a flame of fire (Hebrews 1).

Not all angels have this job of being public servants, some of them are merely 'spirits'. One cannot serve God as an angel without being holy, and those in the holy spirit must serve. So it appears that not all angels are holy. These non public service non holy angels are not demons however, they still worship God for the scripture says.

11 And all the angels were standing around the throne and the elders and the four living creatures, and they fell upon their faces before the throne and worshiped God (Revelation 7).

The Big Bang

Scientifically, what is it? As the reader will see, LW understandings fit very well with modern science.

The first thing to understand is that at the time of the Big Bang, which was the creation of the universe, space and time took the form that we are now familiar with. In scientific terms, space-time came into existence. God did not invent space and time, as we presently know them, separately. He invented forward only time and space together at the Big Bang, when he said: Let there be light. Modern physics indicates this, but the bible declares it in the first few verses of Genesis 1. Genesis 1 has a literal meaning (which is fairly symbolic) and it has what we call a Word Symbolic meaning. This second meaning is a part of the bible code and we will not go into it much here. We will just use it to show that the angels pre-existed the Big Bang.

1 In [the] beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
2 Now the earth proved to be formless and waste and there was darkness upon the faces of [the] watery deep; and God's spirit was moving to and fro over the faces of the waters.
3 And God proceeded to say: Let light come to be. Then there came to be light.
4 After that God saw that the light was good, and God brought about a division between the light and the darkness.
5 And God began calling the light Day, but the darkness he called Night. And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, a first day (Genesis 1).

The Hebrew day runs from evening to evening. So the day starts in the evening and then has the morning. The days of Genesis 1 are not 24 hour days, they are not days defined by the rotation of the earth, they are creative days, epochs of many years in duration. The question that is begging to be asked above is how could God have invented light after he invented the earth? We know from physics that light existed at the Big Bang, before the earth was created. The answer is that he invented a new type of light half way through the first creative day, and this type of light replaced the type of light that was created by the Big Bang. This new light defined the 'morning' of that 'day'. In fact God changed the speed of light half way through the first creative day. The bible says explicitly that God invented a new light in each creative day as follows...

5 And there came to be evening and there came to be morning a first light
8 And there came to be evening and there came to be morning a second light
13 And there came to be evening and there came to be morning a third light
19 And there came to be evening and there came to be morning a fourth light
23 And there came to be evening and there came to be morning a fifth light
31 And there came to be evening and there came to be morning a sixth light

The light defines the morning in each day but God calls the light, day, because the new light reveals the creations of the new day and defines it. The scripture does not say there came to be evening a first light (day), it says there came to be morning a first light (day). The new light then waxes and wanes over the subsequent morning and evening until the next light appears in the next day. The light of the first day, that appeared in the morning, was not the first light ever to appear, it was the new light that appeared in that first day. The various different lights are in fact various different speeds of light. There are scientific theories that require the speed of light to have changed in order for the universe to be stable. And of course the present value of the speed of light prevents us from leaving our solar system and screwing up the entire galaxy. At the time of the Big Bang, light was 360,000 times faster than it is today - see U234. And light will return to being that speed in the future, once we have learned how to behave. The significance of these different speeds of light is that the age of the universe is not 11-15 billion years old as presently measured by the time it takes light to get to us from the furthest away stars. It is in fact only around 100,000 years old, since the speed of light has been a lot faster in the past. The significance of this is that God has not sat around doing nothing for billions of years and then gone crazy in activity in the last few thousand. He was been really busy for all of the last 100,000 years. We have covered this ground here to fully explain the statement: Let there be light, in the literal meaning of Genesis 1.

The Symbolic Meaning of Genesis 1

The above covers only the literal meaning of Genesis 1 (which is a highly symbolic literal meaning). There is also a symbolic meaning to Genesis 1 which we are not going fully to explain here, we will just state it.  

We can show by employing the bible code, that initially there was God and no one else. Then God created the spiritual realm, historically bi-directional time and the angels. Then God created space-time with the Big Bang and he created physical light and he made time unidirectional. Then he created the humans. If you do not wish to read this section please skip it and continue with the next section.

The first line of Genesis says...

1 In [the] beginning God created the heavens and the earth (Genesis 1).

The literal meaning of the chapter is the creation of the earth and of the physical universe, the physical heavens if you like. The symbolic meaning is the creation of heaven, not the heaven of the physical universe, but the heaven in which the angels dwell. This heaven is the spiritual universe.

The earth in the symbolic meaning stands for God's heavenly administration. The waters are all the angels. 

1 Praise Jah, You people! Praise Jehovah from the heavens,
Praise him in the heights.
2 Praise him, all you his angels.
Praise him, all you his army.
3 Praise him, you sun and moon.
Praise him, all you stars of light.
4 Praise him, you heavens of the heavens,
And you waters that are above the heavens.
5 Let them praise the name of Jehovah;
For he himself commanded, and they were created (Psalms 148).

The heavens are the spiritual realm. God's spirit is the group of holy angels that are loyal to God. But there was a time that only Satan fell into this category. This time was at the beginning of the enactment of divine law. Light is divine law - see U300. 

Science theorises a 'Big Bang' which started off the universe. The bible, on the other hand, refers to God saying: Let there be light... 

2 Now the earth proved to be formless and waste and there was darkness upon the faces of [the] watery deep; and God's spirit [Lucifer] was moving/fluttering to and fro over the faces of the waters.
3 And God proceeded to say: Let there be light. Then there came to be light.

In other words Satan - see I16, who is also Lucifer (bringer of light, from 'the shining one, son of the dawn' Isaiah 14:12) was going backwards and forwards in time before the statement: Let there be light. He cannot have been going backwards and forwards in space, since there was no space. Although fluttering indicates a small movement backwards and forwards, so presumably he could go forwards in time only up to the present event horizon during the bi-directional period, and then go back a little and undo a recent mistake. This seems impossible in space-time, due to the physical effect on others, but in the less restricted spiritual heavens, who knows? The angels, the waters, could likewise rewrite history in this manner. In other words time was historically bi-directional (i.e. you could go back and undo and return no further than the present) before divine law came to be. Then it became unidirectional when this law was enacted. But we know that unidirectional time is what we have today in space-time, which is a causal system. So the origin of space time was the change from historically bi-directional time to unidirectional time. So the statement: Let there be light was the origin of space time (which science theorises was the 'Big Bang'). The Big Bang (which we use colloquially to mean the origin of space time) was when time became unidirectional. But the Big Bang was when physical light also came into existence. So Satan actually brought divine law light and physical light into existence on behalf of God at the Big Bang. God was using the physical creation of light to demonstrate physically to the angels the spiritual effect of divine law.

So Angels came before the Big Bang. Physical light travels at a pre-defined speed independent of the dynamic status of any observer (as Einstein discovered) so light is a measure of time. Actually light is God's galactic clock. Light measures time. The division between day and night is the division between the physical and the spiritual realms. 

We have investigated the things above because we need to know in crude terms what God did before we can attempt to answer the question why he did it! Incidentally, abusers nearly always try and minimize their abuse after it has occurred and continue as if they have done nothing wrong before the next bout of abuse. They effectively rewrite history after each abusive episode. They are in fact behaving as if we still existed in bi-directional time! Short memories are the human equivalent of bi-directional time. We forget abuse far too quickly. Not that we should hold a grudge or that we should take vengeance, but we should not by any means facilitate further abuse.

God was by himself before he created anything

God began (if that is the right word) all by himself. He had no helper as a complement for him. He therefore created the angels. Then, after he created Adam, God realised that his human creation had the same problem that he had had in the first place.

18 And Jehovah God went on to say: It is not good for the man to continue by himself. I am going to make a helper for him, as a complement of him. (Genesis 2).

It is important to understand that in this state of solitude God invented love. We can only theorize as to how he did this, but presumably he created something which he became attached to and realized that this was the most important thing that he had created. He then created a whole universe which is run essentially according to 3 laws which are:

1. We must love God
2. We must love each other
3. We must have a set of laws which enable the above two loves to flourish in our society.

So because he wanted to love and to be loved, he wished to procreate, and that is why he created the angels as helpers and as a compliment for him. God certainly created in us the capability to love and he certainly loves us. The angels are made in his image just as we are so they too have the capability to love and God loves them.

He then created space-time in order to show up angelic sin initially. Angels have characters just as we do and just as God does. They interact with each other out of free will just as we do. 

7 You made him a little lower than angels; with glory and honor you crowned him, and appointed him over the works of your hands (Hebrews 2).

26 And God went on to say: Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness, and let them have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and the domestic animals and all the earth and every moving animal that is moving upon the earth (Genesis 1).

So we are made in their image only a little lower in powers and in experience. But we are not made any lower in love. So they can be unjust to each other and they can sin against each other and against God just as we do. Space-time was the nursery school for the angels. God needed to freeze their mistakes in time, in order that they would recognise them and repent from them and learn from them. This is why he made time unidirectional, for otherwise all the angels would be having groundhog days with their sins. Angels are restricted by time but not by space. Time is how angels are held accountable. In bi-directional time, an angel could go up to his friend and be really nasty, and then say, what are you worried about I am going to undo all of this in a few minutes anyway. In this way everything becomes a joke and nothing is really learned. God is restricted by neither space nor time. Humans are restricted by space and time.

However, having created the angels with free will, some of them chose to leave God's administration and formed a rebellion. This rebellion was actually headed up by Satan, whilst Satan was still acting as God's CEO, God's high priest. Satan was the firstborn angel and he originally had the rights of the firstborn which are to run God's administration for him - see I16. So Satan was actually running both the good angels and the bad angels, just like Chancellor Palpatine in Star Wars. The trouble that the bad angels had was that they could not clearly see how dangerous their abandonment of God's laws was because they were immortal and indestructible physically and therefore immune to any 'real' consequences of their sin from a physical perspective (of course they were susceptible to punishment from God - all law carries within it some form of punishment). If an angel is denied spiritual food he does not die of hunger. If he is denied emotional healthcare he does not become physically ill, if he is attacked he does not get injured or die. Incidentally God was fully aware of Satan's duplicity but he is bound by his own laws, and Satan was smart enough to hold to God's laws in such a way that he could not be removed from his firstborn inheritance whilst he was corrupting and enticing other angels to break these laws and join the lawless community that Satan was running for his own glory in heaven.

God created humans to physicalise the effects of sin. We are the full body scanner for angelic sin. We are a diagnostic tool for God. 

9 For it seems to me that God has put us the apostles last on exhibition as men appointed to death, because we have become a theatrical spectacle to the world, and to angels, and to men (1 Corinthians 4).

We are created fragile so that we learn how important it is to love one another. The angels, who were created immortal, did not properly learn that lesson without us. As Paul said...

10 Therefore I take pleasure in weaknesses, in insults, in cases of need, in persecutions and difficulties, for Christ. For when I am weak, then I am powerful (2 Corinthians 12).

Millions of starving and dying Africans show categorically that the greed of the few is the hunger of the many. Cancer shows categorically that corruption is ultimately terminal if left unchecked as do several countries in the Continent of Africa presently. The grand finale of our diagnostic extravaganza is that we actually wipe ourselves out. In this way we demonstrate categorically, tragically and spectacularly that all sin is ultimately destructive. We demonstrate conclusively that stopping sinning is necessary to ensure survival. The theory of evolution postulates the survival of the fittest. But in truth it is the survival of the sinless that describes our only future. All of this pain that we suffer is of benefit to us even more than it is of benefit to the angels who watch us. We will reach true love a lot faster than many of them, due to our increased suffering, even though we were born second. 

For God's laws are simply the minimum set of rules which ensure the continued existence of a society.

But as God himself discovered when he was all alone, when he was simulating possible futures, existence is fairly meaningless without love. To live is to love. An indefinite existence without love is not what God wanted. In fact an indefinite existence without love may not even be possible. And true love is impossible without free will. Because love is a choice. 

So God's laws are also the minimum set of rules for a society which enable love to flourish.

To sum it all up. God wanted to create a community of free willed people who had learned from others what he had learned for himself about love. He wanted a child like himself. He wanted to procreate. The whole universe is a nursery for that child and it is the forum for his love and for our love. But he could not just leave his kids all alone to learn love for themselves as he had to, because that would be denying his love to his children. So he teaches us love personally. In other words God taught himself love, but we are taught love by our parents. In fact this is what being a parent is all about.

The end result is that God can love various free willed beings and be loved by those beings to the same extent that he loves them. They will be able to and will choose to love him with the same level of love that he has for them. We will be equals with God and with Christ in love, but they will still be our spiritual parents and our Gods. Jesus Christ has attained that level of love and is now a God just like Jehovah. Our destiny is to follow him to divinity which is perfect love. Of course all of these free willed beings will love each other with this level of love as well. For it is God's purpose to love all of his children and for them to learn true love. This type of love is defined by God through Paul as follows...

1 If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels but do not have love, I have become a sounding brass or a clashing cymbal.
2 And if I have the gift of prophesying and am acquainted with all the sacred secrets and all knowledge, and if I have all the faith so as to transplant mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing.
3 And if I give all my belongings to feed others, and if I hand over my body, that I may boast, but do not have love, I am not profited at all.
4 Love is long-suffering and kind. Love is not jealous, it does not brag, does not get puffed up,
5 does not behave indecently, does not look for its own interests, does not become provoked. It does not keep account of the injury.
6 It does not rejoice over unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth.
7 It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.
8 Love never fails (1 Corinthians 13).

Imagine the most loving moment that you ever experienced in your life. Now imagine feeling that all the time for everyone and imagine knowing that everyone feels that all the time for you. Now tell me if that is a future worth fighting for?

[3]  The Armageddon Equation and the Corruption Equilibrium

Armageddon

Every society of reasoning beings has the capability to invent a way of destroying itself. Because we have such a capability we need also to invent or discover and then choose to accept, a set of rules which prevent us from destroying ourselves. So every reasoning society is in a race, a race between their technological advancement and their moral advancement. If they discover how to destroy themselves before they discover the set of rules which prevent them destroying themselves then they risk self annihilation. In simple terms it is God's job to teach us the rules of self preservation before we destroy ourselves. We can represent our precarious position in mathematical terms as follows:

Stability = Morality - Technology

This is what we call the Armageddon Equation. The stability of our Society is the gap between our morality and our technology. If our morality is better than our technology then we have a future. If our technology is better than our morality then we may not have a future. Martin Luther King described this very situation, observing that we have guided missiles and misguided men. The rules necessary for the avoidance of self annihilation are a derivative of our morality and the capability to destroy ourselves is a derivative of our technology.

Putting this even more simplistically. If our society is a car, then our morality is the steering wheel and our technology is the engine. Obviously the larger the engine and the smaller the steering wheel the less stable the car is. One thinks of a dragster at Santa Pod for example. The world is presently at that precise stage.

Now we all know that mankind does not normally learn any lesson until he absolutely has to. Too little too late is the modus operandi of this species. So if you were God then how would you teach us that disobeying a basic moral code will lead to our destruction? Will a load of theoretical arguments convince the great masses of mankind?

Regrettably it would appear not. So God has to allow us to destroy ourselves in order to motivate us to learn how not to destroy ourselves. Obviously he has to put us back together again afterwards in order that we can attend class. In other words God will permit those of us who have not learned the lesson of the Armageddon equation to destroy ourselves. Although he will remove (by rapture, which is an instantaneous conversion into an angel) those who have learned that lesson beforehand. But those of us who refuse to learn the lesson, using our God given powers of reason, will nonetheless learn the lesson by actually being wiped out along with their unreasoning brothers and sisters at Armageddon.

Then God will resurrect these blind ones after Armageddon and show them the action replay of their own destruction and ask them. Well guys, can you see where you went wrong here?

Corruption

Imagine that society is represented by a boat floating on the ocean. Corruption in society is represented by the holes in that boat. Our technology is represented by our capability to pump water out of the boat.

Before the industrial revolution we had very limited water pumping capability, so we could not afford to have many holes in the boat, so we made sure that the boat was fairly seaworthy, so we were not particularly corrupt. But after the industrial revolution we invented much more powerful pumps driven by engines, so we could pump a lot more water, so we could remain afloat with much bigger holes in the boat, so we stopped mending the holes, so we became a lot more corrupt. Then with the advent of the information revolution we developed sophisticated control systems for our water pumps, and became able to pump out even more water in an even more reliable way than before. So then we had almost no motivation to mend the holes in the boat and the whole of society was being kept afloat by virtue of these fantastic water pumps. Then with advances in computer modeling and hydrodynamics we became able to make water jets which could literally shoot the water straight out of the boat. At this point it became irrelevant how many holes the boat had since our pumps were so good. Finally the boat developed so many holes that it just fell apart.

The point is that corruption just increases to absorb all of the gains that technology has made. This is the corruption equilibrium. The better our technology is, the more corruption we can sustain and so the greater our corruption becomes. The sad reality is that technology facilitates corruption, putting this in political parlance. "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." A real day example of this is provided by the PC. The Windows operating system has grown in size and complexity at roughly the same rate that Hardware has grown in computational capability. This is not a coincidence. It is an example of the corruption equilibrium. The result is that many of the performance gains from improved hardware have disappeared into spaghetti code software inefficiency (a kind of computational corruption). If you like, the corruption equilibrium is the equation that has Moore's law (which states that information technology hardware will double in capability every 18 months) on one side. And on the other side it has the law that IT industry corruption will double every 18 months too, and so the consumer ends up hardly any better off at the end of each 18 month period than he was at the start of the period. 

Have you ever wondered why it is that with technology and machines that are 100 times more efficient today than they were 200 years ago, we all still have to work every hour God gives us just to make a living? Surely we should only be working only one hour in every hundred today? The answer is that we have been robbed of the fruits of our brilliant technological advances by the corruption mainly of our governments but also of many other aspects of society dictated by the corruption equilibrium. We are 100 times more technologically advanced than we were 200 years ago and therefore we are 100 times more corrupt. 

Putting this crudely technological advance without an equivalent moral advance is a zero sum game, which must lead to our self annihilation.

The technology tragedy

We are asserting that technology is corrupting and ultimately completely destructive to a society unless the society has good moral laws which they choose freely to adhere to. Since mankind does not adhere to the basic set of moral laws described in the bible, all technological advance is a step backwards disguised as a step forwards. It is a step closer to the edge. This is a truly tragic realisation for mankind. The scientists who were inventing the atomic bomb, were very concerned about the uses to which it might be put. But the above reasoning shows that similar concerns should result from all technological advances, even the electric toaster.

[4]  The Bible and its Translations

The Old Testament was originally written in Hebrew and the New testament was originally written in Greek. The Hebrew Text of the old Testament that is used as the basis of most English translations today is the BHS, the Biblia Hebraica Stutgartensia. The 3 main Greek Texts used as the basis of most English translations today are the United Bible Societies 3rd corrected Edition/Nestle Aland 26th Edition (Alexandrine Manuscript), The Hodges and Farstad Majority text, and the Wescott & Hort Greek Text (Vatican B manuscript). These Hebrew and Greek Texts are considered to be the closest to the original Hebrew and Greek texts which we no longer possess. 

Bibles

Lord, open the King of England's eyes!

The New International Version Hebrew English Old Testament   -  Kohlenberger
The New Greek English Interlinear New Testament  -  Brown and Comfort

The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures, published by the Watchtower.
The NIV interlinear Greek English New Testament, by Marshall, published by Zondervan.
The Greek New Testament According to the majority text, Zane C. Hodges & Arthur L. Farstad, published by Nelson.

The Analytical Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon  -  Ben Davidson
The Analytical Lexicon to the Greek New Testament  -  William Mounce

The Decoders Version

7 Let he who is without sin cast the first stone at her (John 8 -  KJV - ish)
7 The one sinless of you first upon her let him throw stone (John 8 - Greek Interlinear - Kingdom Interlinear Bible)

Downloadable and Online Bibles and Books

[5]  Pre-adamic man

27 And God proceeded to create the man in his image, in God’s image he created him, male and female he created them (Genesis 1).

26 And he made out of one [man] every nation of men, to dwell upon the entire surface of the earth, and he decreed the appointed times and the set limits of the dwelling of [men] (Acts 17).

The conflict

The Fundamental Christian says that Adam, who was created around 6,000 years ago according to biblical chronology, was the first man, and so Archaeology is rubbish. The Archaeologist says mankind has for a fact been around for 30,000 years and we have good evidence that he has been around for over 2 million years, so the concept that we began with Adam 6,000 years ago is rubbish and therefore Genesis is rubbish. Incidentally, if the speed of light was faster for the first half, the evening half, of the 6th creative day - see I2, then the radio carbon dating of the 2 million year old human fossils would be incorrect. In fact we understand that the speed of light was 360 times faster at the start of the 6th creative day, than it is today, and so the human fossils are crudely speaking 360 times younger than we think. For people who like this sort of thing please visit U234 - A brief history of light.

So how do we resolve this conflict between Science and Religion? They both cannot be right! Traditionally religious people just throw away their reasoning capability and say, my faith tells me that the bible is right and that is the end of it. This is a very dangerous thing to do. It is a lazy idolatry of an illogical church doctrine, it is selling God and his book, the bible, short. It happens because people in general do not have the courage of their deductions. They do not believe that they have the mental power to climb out of the trap that has been laid for them. The fact that over a billion people in the world believe in the Trinity doctrine, which amounts to the abolition of the number 2, demonstrates clearly how little confidence mankind has in his own reasoning capability. No rational man could ever accept the Catholic Trinity Doctrine, but it took a certain Isaac Newton to make that point in England, some 1650 years after Christ died. 

So all those who do accept the trinity are just demonstrating how easy they are to brainwash. And the Muslim suicide bombers of the last days are busy showing us just how dangerous religious brainwashing can be. Most, if not all people with faith, throw away their reason when they join a religion and just accept the doctrine of their church or mosque or synagogue etc. So one could argue that every Christian who believes in the trinity is one step away from being a suicide bomber. But Jesus did not command us to become brainwashed idolaters of the lame spiritual understandings of lazy control freak priests or rabbis or imams. He said:

37 You must love Jehovah your God with your whole heart and with your whole soul and with your whole mind (Matthew 22).

And the first living stone that Jesus laid in the Christian church (Peter), said...

13 Hence brace up your minds for activity, keep your senses completely; set your hope upon the undeserved kindness that is to be brought to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ (1 Peter 1).

This Revelation requires brain power and of course the world is being dumbed down further and further every day at the very time that the Revelation is occurring because there is a battle that we are the victims of between the holy angels and the deadly demons. But we can avoid being a casualty of this war if we open the eyes of our mind.  

The Resolution

Jesus said that we should scrutinize every little detail of every scripture...

17 Do not think I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I came, not to destroy, but to fulfill.

18 For truly I say to you that sooner would heaven and earth pass away than for one smallest letter or one particle of a letter to pass away from the Law [of God, the whole bible] by any means and not all things take place (Matthew 5).

Let us therefore apply this kind of scrutiny to the account of the creation of mankind in Genesis 1.

26 And God [Elohim literally 'Gods' meaning the holy spirit under God's direction] went on to say: Let us make man [md)] in our image, according to our likeness, and let them have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and the domestic animals and all the earth and every moving [animal] that is moving upon the earth.
27 And God [Elohim meaning Jehovah himself - see Genesis 2:4,7] proceeded to create the man [md)h] in his image, in God's image he created him; male and female he created them 28 Further, God blessed them [Adam and Eve] and God said to them: Be fruitful and become many and fill the earth and subdue it, and have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and every living [being] that is moving upon the earth (Genesis 1).

4 This is a history of the heavens and the earth in the time of their being created, in the day that Jehovah God [YHWH Elohim] made earth and heaven (Genesis 2).
7 And Jehovah God [YHWH Elohim qualifying the ambiguous verses 27 and 28] proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man came to be a living soul (Genesis 2).

Now at first sight this looks like a rather repetitive account of the creation of mankind. But let us examine these 3 verses a bit closer since they may just hold the secret to our very existence within them. Here is a comparative table of the two successive accounts of our creation...

So verses 27 and 28 are not merely a repetition of the creative act of verse 26. Verses 27 and 28 are the creation of something different from verse 26. Verse 26 is the creation of 'man', of mankind, of pre-adamic man. Pre-adamic man was created by the holy angels in the joint image of his angelic parents a male angel anda female angel, whereas verse 27 is the creation of 'the man', Adam.  Adam was created by God without the involvement of his wife, the holy spirit, and made in the image of God alone, being a direct first generation son of God, like Satan was. God is perfect, the angels are not, these are therefore two different images and therefore two different creations.

Pre-adamic man was not blessed, Adam was. Adam was blessed with procreating power in order that he could fill the earth, and with authority over every living being including the pre-adamics on the earth. Adam did actually fill the earth, the pre-adamics did not. 

Pre-adamics were effectively angels. They were created in the image and the likeness of the angels. In other words they were born as angels at the same time that they were born as humans. They were born again when they were born. Therefore like the angels they did not marry...

30 for in the resurrection neither do men marry nor are women given in marriage, but are as angels in heaven (Matthew 22).

But Adam who was made in God's image but not said to be made in his likeness, was not born again when he was born. Rather he was born again aged 30 as an archetype of Michael's entrance into Jesus and Immanuel's exit into his associated angel - see I17 and U41.

Death came to humans from Satan and through Adam...

21 For since death is through a man, resurrection of the dead is also through a man.
22 For just as in Adam all are dying, so also in the Christ all will be made alive (1 Corinthians 15).

The pre-adamics did not die, since death came through Adam and since angels do not die. Their human bodies died but their spirits were raptured at that time into their associated angelic bodies. Presumably there was no reason for their bodies to grow old, so they grew to maturity and remained in a steady state until they were raptured we imagine. They became the angels that they really were at their 'death'. 

According to www.drmcdougall.com (the McDougall Newsletter January 2006 vol 5 number 1) ...

No prehistoric remains have been found of people older than 50 years. (This is also discussed in 'Anti-aging is an oxymoron' L. Hayflick, Journal of Gerontology 2004 June 59 (6): B573-6).

Although they did not actually fall asleep in death but were transferred in the twinkling of an eye so as not to see it.

Whereas Adam, having sinned, got his everlasting inheritance as a son of God, because Jesus ransomed him.

6 Who gave himself a corresponding ransom over all, [this is] what is to be witnessed to at its own particular times (1 Timothy 2).

Adam was made in God's image in the sense that he was alone without brothers or sisters or family in his form in the Garden for 19 years, and in fact his life followed the pattern of God's early life - see U41. God likewise was alone before he created any other life forms. Furthermore being a son of God he has an inheritance which is to be a God, even a God to the angels, just as the angels and indeed all sons of God can aspire to be Gods one day just like their father. They merely have to grow up first!

Furthermore Adam once he was born again, became a direct son of God, a first generation son of God, just like Satan. Whereas the angels are in general sons of sons of God. This genealogical descent puts Adam equal to Satan. This will have been the cause of Satan's jealousy. Furthermore, as we shall discover, the angels could not themselves procreate directly without the help of the holy spirit, whereas Adam could and so again in this way he was in God's image not the image of the angels. So in fact, in procreative terms, Adam was ahead of Satan whilst he was in the Garden. One can therefore regard Satan's murder of our parents as an act of genocide intended to remove this advantage that the firstborn human, Adam, had over the firstborn angel, Satan.

God involved the angels in the creation of pre-adamic man in order that they would feel a kinship with them and a responsibility for them. This would make it easier for them to learn from us just as parents learn from their children even today. 

Are the angels male and female?

Traditionally mankind believes them to be effectively neuter. In favour of this point of view we have the fact that they are always referred to as 'sons of God' in the bible and never as 'daughters of God'.

7 When the morning stars joyfully cried out together, And all the sons of God began shouting in applause? (Job 38).
6 For who in the skies can be compared to Jehovah? Who can resemble Jehovah among the sons of God? (Psalm 89)
43 Be glad, O heavens, together with him, and let all the angels of God worship him. Be glad, you nations, with his people, and let all the sons of God strengthen themselves in him, (LXXBagster Deuteronomy 32).

Demons here are evening stars with Satan being the moon, and angels are morning stars with Jesus being the Sun. Furthermore female Christians eventually become sons of God, not daughters of God.

9 Happy are the peacemakers since they will be called 'sons of God' (Matthew 5).
26 You are all, in fact, sons of God through your faith in Christ Jesus (Galatians 3).

So women are to become male sons of God? Surely only confused mankind goes in for gender re-assignment surgery?

We know from the scriptures that God hates homosexuality...

22 And you must not lie down with a male the same as you lie down with a woman. It is a detestable thing (Leviticus 18).

We know from the scriptures and from common sense that Lesbianism is un-natural... 

26 That is why God gave them up to disgraceful sexual appetites, for both their females changed the natural use of themselves into one contrary to nature
27 and likewise even the males left the natural use of the female and became violently inflamed in their lust toward one another, males with males, working what is obscene and receiving in themselves the full recompense, which was due for their error. (Romans 1).

God even detests cross dressing...

5 No garb of an able-bodied man should be put upon a woman, neither should an able-bodied man wear the mantle of a woman; for anybody doing these things is something detestable to Jehovah your God (Deuteronomy 22).

So would God put a female human in a male angelic body? Absolutely not. So either the 'sons of God' are asexual, or they are male and female like we are. But would God put a male into a neuter body? Well such an action would not transgress any of his laws on sex, so it is possible. So the question now becomes, are the angels all neuter or are they male and female?

Well we read in Genesis that the demons came down and married women before the flood and had children with them...

2 then the sons of the [true] God began to notice the daughters of men, that they were good-looking; and they went taking wives for themselves, namely, all whom they chose (Genesis 6).

4 The Nephilim proved to be in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of the [true] God continued to have
relations with the daughters of men and they bore sons to them, they were the mighty ones who were of old, the men of fame (Genesis 6).

These are not the actions of asexual neuter beings. These angels were not said to come down because they wanted to procreate, they were said to come down because the women looked good. So they must have felt some kind of sex drive. In fact their sex drive was so strong that they sinned, by coming down here and leaving their proper dwelling place of the heavens...

6 And the angels that did not keep their original position but forsook their own proper dwelling place he has reserved with eternal bonds under dense darkness for the judgment of the great day (Jude). 

Actually their spirits left their proper dwelling place of an angelic body and came down in super hero human bodies to sleep with women and create Nephilim.

Jesus adds to the debate with his answer to the sadducees (who say there is no resurrection) about marriage in the Kingdom of God...

28 Consequently, in the resurrection, which of the 7 will she be [a] woman of (gunh)? For they all had (ecw) her.
29 In reply Jesus said to them: You are mistaken, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God,
30 for in the resurrection neither do they marry (gamew) nor are they given in marriage (gamizw), but are as angels in heaven (Matthew 22).

24 Jesus said to them: Is not this why you are mistaken, your not knowing either the Scriptures or the power of God?
25 For when they rise (anisthmi) out of [the] dead [ones] (nekroV), neither do they marry (gamew) nor are they given in marriage (gamizw), but are as angels in the heavens (Mark 12).

34 Jesus said to them: The sons of this system of things marry (gamew) and are given in marriage (gamizw),
35 but those who have been counted worthy of gaining that system of things and of the resurrection, the [one] out of [the] dead [ones] (nekroV) neither marry (gamew) nor are given in marriage (gamizw).
36 In fact, neither can they die (apoqnhskw) anymore, for they are like the angels, and they are sons of God, being sons of the resurrection (Luke 20).

In all three accounts of his answer we read that Jesus made the distinction between men marrying and women being given in marriage and then compared this situation to that of the angels. We see that 'sons of this system' can be given in marriage and are therefore female. We also see from verse 36 that women who are resurrected as sanctified born again human women are called 'sons of the resurrection' and 'sons of God'. So 'sons of God' can in fact be human daughters of God with associated angels. The word 'sons' really is used to mean offspring. This site uses the term 'sons of the 1AC', to mean men and women and children with a faith that makes them beneficiaries of the first Abrahamc covenant - see I29. So nothing Jesus said forces angels to be neuter. 

Jesus did not actually answer the question as to who would get the woman in the Kingdom, he just said there would be no marriage for those who have risen from the dead. This does not mean there will be no marriage in the kingdom of God. It means there will be no marriage amongst those who are not judicially dead and are therefore as angels in heaven. There will be no marriage for those who are spirit baptised, those who are born again, those who have associated angelic bodies - see I12. 

Marriage is an institution for the dead, the judicially dead. It is for the judicially first dead and the judicially second dead. It is not for those with associated angels.

It is fine to be married for a long as you live, if you are not going to live for long. For death ends the marriage 'till death us do part'. But it is no good getting married if you are going to live indefinitely or forever. So angels do not get married, as such a thing would be a monstrous commitment. Likewise the saints do not get married in the Kingdom of God, but those who are not saints do. 

Now Jesus is saying two things. He says that being given in marriage does not occur in heaven and he says that marrying does not occur in heaven. So he is telling us that there are both male and female angels. For it is females who are given in marriage and males who marry. But the power of Jesus' seeming labouring of this point is that there exist both sexes in the heavens... 

12 For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern thoughts and intentions of [the] heart (Hebrews 4).

Given that all scriptures have power, there is no irrelevant repetition or meaningless labouring of points in the scriptures. If we are told that men do not get married and neither do women but are an angels in this respect, then we must have male and female angels.

Using the bible code to prove for a fact that there are male and female angels

The only part of the bible code that we cover in this introductory book/website is the Binary Question Principle. It says...

And this scripture plainly does not refer to this system since the reader will not need to be told by the writer that for the most part Satan is not satisfying but is rather frustrating the desire of every living thing at present. But in the next system, God will satisfy all of us...

4 And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The former things have passed away (Revelation 21).

He will need a big Kleenex! So in particular those who want babies will have babies. So judicially alive people will have babies out of wedlock in the next system. But they will not have them willy nilly like they do in this system. There will be some child rearing agreement that the two parents make with each other, that amounts to a temporary marriage. This agreement can be terminated after the child is fully reared one imagines. But by virtue of 7 of these agreements, the woman of the Sadducees example could actually have a child with each of the 7 brothers sequentially in the new system if the rules would permit such a thing. After all the whole purpose of brother-in-law marriage was to produce a child. For a physical example in this system of serial child rearing agreements have a look at the excellent movie: The March of the penguins.

There are two other aspects of the code which absolutely nail the existence of male and female angels. We will just state them here for completeness.

[1] 'Male and female he created them' Genesis (1:27) applies to humans in the literal meaning, and angels in the greater meaning see U300.

[2] Matthew 1 is the angelic ancestry of the angel Michael in the first greater meaning. And it has 4 women in it. These 4 are therefore 4 angelic women - see U254

So yes, there are male and female angels. The pre-adamics are in the image of these angels in the respect of Gender. In fact Gender is a tutor leading to love. God himself is neither male nor female because his love is perfect. We are imperfect in our love, so God made us and our brothers and sisters, the angels, and the pre-adamics, male and female, to teach all of us the surpassing value of love. Actually to teach us all the surpassing value of loving just one person. 

Sex is a tutor to love. All beings are sexual both human and angelic until they become Gods. Gods have perfect love and therefore need no tutor and therefore are asexual. Even if you hate all of your brothers, there will be some woman somewhere that you love. Regrettably in this system she may not love you. But nonetheless the lesson in the second commandment, to love your brother, is there. In a similar vein one needs both a king and a priest until one has fully grasped the first commandment we think. Although born again sons of God would appear to be able to be both? 

How Adam was made in God's Image and the pre-adamics were made in 'our image'

At last we can nail the understanding of these statements. Heterosexual reproduction produces a child with genetic material from both parents. This will be true of the angels as well. An angelic child will have a body with certain predisposed character traits of the mother and of the father as default. So the pre-adamics had children which had the character traits of both of their parents in their default makeup. But Adam had the character traits of God, his father, and the holy spirit as a group, his mother. But the holy spirit as a group has the character of God. So Adam, like Satan before him, had perfect character of God as his default predisposition. Adam had absolutely noentally skewed genetic pre-disposition. He was perfectly balanced, as Satan was before him. This is not true however of Eve, since her character was formed before she was baptised in Adam's bone becoming a direct female clone of him - see U301.

Pre-adamic Man was sexually active but could not procreate and fill the earth

The second human creation of 'the man' is further specified by the phrase 'male and female he created them' and the first creation of 'man' is not so specified. Adam and Eve were told to fill the earth, and pre-adamic man were not told to fill the earth. Man, pre-adamic man, did not have a wife...

20 But for Man [md)] there was found no helper as a complement for him (Genesis 2)

The scripture does not say: But for the man, there was found no helper as a complement for him. So Adamic man had a wife, but again pre-adamic man had no wife. So pre-adamic man could not directly procreate and did not get married, just like the angels. We initially thought that this meant he was asexual. But archaeology is against that hypothesis. There are cave paintings of men and women having sex which predate Adam. So then we theorized that pre-adamic man was male and female and sexual but sterile. This would certainly fit the scriptural constraints that we have discovered for him. Pre-adamic man would be male and female in form and in character but not reproductively male and female. The big change with Adam and Eve would then have been the capability for independent human-human reproduction. Prior to that humans were made some other way and could not reproduce without assistance from the angels. Although Eve only became fertile after she sinned, since sexual reproduction is the preserve of the dead.  

When God brought Eve to Adam, he said:

23 And he said, the man: This is at last bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh
This one will be called woman, because from Man [#y)] this one was taken (Genesis 2).

17 I can count all my bones [Jesus' apostles]. They themselves look, they gaze upon me [they watched him die on the stake] (Psalm 22).

So Eve came from pre-adamic 'Man' as opposed to 'the man'. But she was gene enhanced using the genetic material of Adam, symbolised by his rib, his bone. We are using skeletal building blocks to symbolise genetic building blocks and apostolic building blocks, pillars of the church of Jesus' body. Peter was the first bone of Jesus' body, and start of his wife - see I35. Although the numbers we have of these blocks are different. For most people have 23 Chromosomes and 24 ribs. But with one rib removed you would have 23 ribs. So the bones are the chromosomes and the flesh is the entire body, which is built from the genetic material in the chromosomes. Chromosomes and bones can be counted, flesh cannot be counted.

So this symbolism tells us that Adam and Eve was genetically the same as Adam other than in her sex chromosome. But we know that sexual fertility is controlled and programmed by a single chromosome pair. We know that this is true today. It is the sex chromosome which is XY in a man and XX in a woman. So one can genetically create a woman from a man, but not the other way round. The result of the application of this chromosome to Eve was not that she eventually became fertile however. Fertility is only permitted to the dead. The living who exist in non adamic bodies cannot procreate either in the garden or in the kingdom. She was the female equivalent of pre fall Adam genetically. In a sense Eve was baptised with the rib of Adam. She gained fertility for her indefinitely lasting non ageing body. When she lost that body and has dead flesh with an associated angel, then she could reproduce sexually.

Then the commentary continues with...

24 That is why man [#y)] will leave his father and his mother and he must stick to his wife and they must become one flesh.
25 And both of them continued to be naked, the man and his wife, and yet they did not become ashamed (Genesis 2).

In early Genesis, 'the man' is Adam, man [md)] is pre-adamic man, and man [#y)] is all mankind - see above and see U1. But pre-adamic men did not have genetic  mothers and fathers like we have today, since they were not created by heterosexual reproduction. They were therefore like the angels and like Melchizedek, of whom Paul says...

3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually (Hebrews 7).

The pre-adamic children were carried in surrogate pre-adamic mothers just as Jesus and the non adamics were carried in surrogate adamic mothers. 

Now Adam left God and the Holy spirit and broke God's law and stuck to his wife. He fulfilled the prophecy in Genesis 2:24-25. So he had a mother. So Adam was a direct child of Jehovah and the holy spirit. In other words he was a brother of Satan, a first generation human angel. Whereas the pre-adamics were merely children of an angelic pair, a male and a female angel.

This prophetic drama of Adam's leaving his parents and sticking to his wife is telling us that pre-adamic man did not stick to his wife in that way, he did not get married, he did not have a wife to stick to (but pre-adamics did pair up to raise children). This may also explain why Adam and Eve were naked and unashamed. There was no shame associated with pre-adamic sex. But since his sexual desire lead to his choosing Eve over God, Adam associated sex with sinful desires. Hence he felt shame about sex and so covered himself. In fact Satan seduced Eve, with her insatiable desire for status and showed Eve how to seduce Adam with his insatiable desire for her. 

It is very important to put this in context today. Desiring sex and having a lot of sex and desiring money and having a lot of money are neither of them sins. But if the desire for sex or money or both is greater than the desire for righteousness and God then these desires can lead you into sin which when accomplished brings death. So sex is not a sin, but the desire for it is the most dangerous desire a man has. And likewise financial and other status is not a sin but the desire for it is the most dangerous desire that a woman has. This is the mature view we get from a deep understanding of Adam's fall. Things are no different today - see I25a.

This is why Eve said, on giving birth to Cain: I have produced a man with the aid of Jehovah (Genesis 4:1). Such a thing had never occurred before. Eve was saying, Wow! All these activated components that God has given me have enabled me to produce a man!

How did the Pre-adamics come about?

Jesus was born by in vivo fertilisation of a surrogate mother Mary by the Holy Spirit. He was conceived asexually. He was non adamic, not a son of Adam. Now Jesus is called the Last Adam, so putting this the other way around, Adam was the first Jesus. So Adam was created in the same way that Jesus was created - asexually - see I6. He was also born by in vivo fertilisation by Holy Spirit of a surrogate pre-adamic woman. But then all the pre-adamics were also created asexually as were Jesus and Adam. But then we realise that Adam was pre-adamic as regards his method of creation, since sexual reproduction came later. So the pre-adamics were created in the same way as Jesus and the non adamics were created, which means that it is us, the adamics, who are the odd ones out! And now we see it all.

In the Kingdom of God, those who are born again are 'as angels in heaven'. They do not get married...

30 For in the resurrection neither do men marry nor are women given in marriage, but are as angels in heaven (Matthew 22).

So they too are like Jesus and Adam and the pre-adamics. So now we can see that the born again post adamics of the Kingdom of God are in the same reproductive situation as the pre-adamics and the non adamics and the angels. It is only the judicially 'dead' post adamics who procreate sexually and who get married. 

The angels effectively took the first human in the archeological records, homo habilis, to the modern human, homo sapiens, by an iterative design process during the first half of the 6th creative day. We do not want to use the word 'evolution', but the fossil record appears to show that the pre-adamics were regularly upgraded from the homo habilis to modern man through various stages reached by the intelligent design expertise of the angels. Once the pre-adamic design was perfected, God made Adam. Then he gave us the ability to procreate, which effectively made Adam a God and put mankind into mass production. 

Male and Female pre-adamics were sterile, since they were 'not male and not female' in the reproductive sense. For the scripture says, referring to the man and the woman...

27 And God proceeded to create the man in his image, in God's image he created him; male and female he created them.

The pre-adamics died out and did not go through the flood, because we read...

7 So Jehovah said: I am going to wipe men whom I have created off the surface of the ground, from man to domestic animal, to moving animal and to flying creature of the heavens, because I do regret that I have made them (Genesis 6).

The flood destroyed the sons of Adam and their offspring, not the pre-adamics who were raptured before it came, as we show later in this article. Presumably they were the servants of the adamics as the angels are of God. Eve was to become the mother of everyone living, so Adam knew that pre-adamic reproduction would end. 

20 After this Adam called his wife's name Eve, because she had to become the mother of everyone living (Genesis 3).

'Eve' actually means 'living [one]'. Eve could not become mother of everyone living until after Adam and the pre-adamics had died of course. So the pre-adamics might have died out during Adam's 930 year life, or possibly they lasted until the flood. 

Be Fruitful

We can see that the animals and  Adam, the man, and Noah and his sons, were to be fruitful in the sense that they could reproduce sexually but the pre-adamics were not given that capability...

22 With that God blessed them, saying: Be fruitful and become many and fill the waters in the sea basins, and let the flying creatures become many in the earth (Genesis 1).

27 And God proceeded to create the man in his image, in God's image he created him; male and female he created them.
28 Further, God blessed them and God said to them: Be fruitful and become many and fill the earth and subdue it, and have in
subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and every living creature that is moving upon the earth (Genesis 1).

17 Every living creature that is with you of every sort of flesh, among the flying creatures and among the beasts and among all the moving animals that move upon the earth, bring out with you, as they must swarm in the earth and be fruitful and become many upon the earth (Genesis 8).

1 And God went on to bless Noah and his sons and to say to them: Be fruitful and become many and fill the earth (Genesis 9).

A careful analysis of the above shows this...

Pre-adamics were never commanded to be fruitful, they could not reproduce sexually
Fish were commanded to be fruitful from their creation, they always reproduced sexually
Adam and Eve and their sons and daughters were commanded to be fruitful, then reproduced sexually
Birds and Land Animals were not commanded to be fruitful until they came out of the ark, so they began by reproducing with the help of the angels and then after the flood they went into mass production with sexual reproduction.

This means that the angels were iterating the design of both land animals birds and pre-admaic man until Adam came along. And the pre-adamics had no experience of sexual reproduction either themselves or from the birds or land animals which they could see. Plainly since they did not have underwater photography, they could not see fish reproducing!

Also God brought the land animals and the birds to Adam to be named, showing the familiarity between man and those animals. These ones in the garden were in fact kingdom animals, since the garden of Eden was the Kingdom of God in terms of its creations. This would mean that Kingdom animals do not reproduce sexually. And actually land animals and birds only went into mass reproduction when God gave them to Noah as food. But in the Kingdom we are all vegetarians as Adam was, so we will not need millions of sheep. The account describing the creation of Kingdom animals is as follows...

18 And Jehovah God went on to say: It is not good for the man to continue by himself. I am going to make a helper for him, as a complement of him.
19 Now Jehovah God was forming from the ground every wild beast of the field and every flying creature of the heavens, and he began bringing them to the man to see what he would call each one; and whatever the man would call it, each living soul, that was its name.
20 So the man was calling the names of all the domestic animals and of the flying creatures of the heavens and of every wild beast of the field, but for man there was found no helper as a complement of him (Genesis 2).

God must create the animals for the Kingdom of God before Adam sins, since that sin ends the 6th creative day and starts the creative sabbath, where he rests of creative works...

2 And by the 7th day God came to the completion of his work that he had made, and he proceeded to rest on the 7th day from all his work that he had made.
3 And God proceeded to bless the 7th day and make it sacred, because on it he has been resting from all his work that God has created for the purpose of making (Genesis 2).

Pre-adamics lived in extended family groups. Each kid had a mother and a father whose genes were used by the angels in the creation of the kid as in the case of Jesus. Though the surrogate mother and father were not bound in marriage to each other, they must have been party to a child rearing agreement, as the angels are. So now we see another reason why the angels came down and took the daughters of Adam as their wives. They wanted to have kids on their own terms, without having to ask the holy spirit for them. One wonders whether the holy spirit would permit demons to have children in fact.

Adam’s father would have been the male genetic template for Adam and his mother would have been the female genetic template. But Adam was truly a son of God by holy spirit. So his genes were more than just the result of a merging of the genes of his father and his mother. 

Jesus was conceived from the very DNA of Joseph and Mary, any less would have been adultery by the holy spirit. For when David says... 

In sin my mother conceived me - Psalm 51:5.

he is speaking under inspiration as Jesus and referring to the sinful adamic genes of his conception.

Then God enhanced his genes to make him non adamic - see I18. Likewise the pre-adamics were created by combining the DNA of their two surrogate parents, and then the angels would enhance that DNA to make the children more and more spiritual. This is how man journeyed from Homo Habilis to Homo Sapiens. The journey involved hundreds of iterations and ended with the pre-adamic humans who lived at the time Adam was created. In the case of Jesus, he was a direct descendant of David, but not a direct descendant of sinful Adam after his genes were enhanced. Jesus was enhanced so as to be a direct descendant of pre-fall Adam. In fact the genetic change that Adam went through on eviction, which did not change his appearance, was reversed in the case of Jesus and is reversed in the case of all non adamic humans. In the case of Adam, his genes may have been enhanced so much that he was neither a descendant of his mother or his father. Since Adam had in him much of the genetic material for the whole human race.

In modern industrial parlance, pre-adamics were hand crafted prototypes made in the labs, whereas adamics were mass produced finished models with the full design spec implemented, made from the re-production line. The same could well have been true for the animals as well. In fact the design process for animals and humans used by the angels is really no different from the design process for motor cars or computers used by men today. We design the device virtually on a design computer or on paper, and then make a series of prototypes, and then finally once the design specification is achieved, we go into mass production. Mass production for humans is sexual reproduction which is the blessing of Genesis 1:28. This blessing is in fact the ISO9001 approval stamp from God. Please bear in mind that with human design iterations, mistakes are made. But in the case of angelic design iterations, every living soul would have been free of firmware bugs. Every stage in the process would have been a perfect implementation of a perfect design brief. These early pre-adamics were not substandard, but they were sub functional to modern man. Just as we are sub functional to angels. This iterative process did not occur because God was incapable of moving straight to Adam. It occurred because angels were incapable of such a leap, and mankind exists to teach and correct the angels, not to teach God. So every aspect of our characters is a lesson to them, and there is more than one lesson to be learned, and they cannot learn them all at once.

The Salvation Status of Pre-adamic Man

We know that the pre-adamics, not being under any death sentence, would have been raptured when they died. It is not inconceivable that some of them killed each other however, and possibly lost their salvation status. Now, Adam was made in the image of God and the pre-adamics were made in the image of the angels. So the pre-adamics are the children of the angels and the adamics are the children of God. But God himself was involved in the creation of the pre-adamics for he said: Let us make man in our image. So the pre-adamics had something from God as well. Now since the angels are sons of God, they have the possibility of eternal life. And since the pre-adamics are sons of both the angels and God they too must have this possibility, since like begets like. So God pesumably put the basic 'spiritual' subroutine in the pre-adamic BIOS. The angels then tweaked the whole system for the first half of the 6th creative, day, the evening of that day, to increase abstract thought capability which is part of spirituality. But since Adam was made in God's image, it is apparent that he and his sons will be Gods to not only the pre-adamics, but also their fathers, the angels. For the hierarchy of the fathers will be the hierarchy of the sons. So Satan could see that Adam was competition for him. Adam was a threat to his presidential position.

So the pre-adamics had basic salvation spirituality from the first one that was made, the original homo habilis. But this capability and other physical capabilities and the interaction between the two were presumably iteratively enhanced for a few thousand years until they were perfected and then Adam was made by God - see I2. The Kingdom of God is a second Eden for the sons of Adam and for the pre-adamics who heard the preaching of the sons of Adam. So the pre-adamics who pre-existed Adam will not be a part of that kingdom on earth. But those who lived with him and who listened to him could join a covenant (in fact mediated by Adam himself - I28) and so could enter into the Kingdom of God on earth. All of them of course have been angels in the heavens after they were raptured.

According to archaeological records, pre-adamic man did not worship in temples, the first temples were built after Adam. According to the bible, pre-adamic man was not blessed, meaning that he could not achieve indefinite life or everlasting life in that form as Adam and his sons could. So pre-adamic man took no spiritual test. But he was spiritual, he could think abstractly, we know this from the cave paintings. Yet these were primitive and 2 dimensional. So we can deduce that the pre-adamics had a 2 dimensional spirituality, they were capable of abstract thought to some extent but not to the extent that the sons of Adam are capable of it. They spoke but they did not write. The capability to think abstractly in great depth was the pre-requisite for God to appear through Adam and for true worship in temples to begin and for salvation testing to commence and for writing to be invented. 

Once the pre-adamics had progressed to this stage in abstract metaphorical thinking capability, God appeared to them through Adam. 

Pre-adamics did not age and were raptured at 50 to join their angelic parents

The pre-adamics were spiritual infants, too young spiritually to be baptised. The archaeological records show that their mean physical lifespan was around 30-40 years, somewhat less than that of a Roman in the days of the Christ. But the pre-adamics were not under a death sentence as we are thanks to Adam, so it would not be reasonable of God to have had them falling apart due to old age. So they presumably were raptured at perhaps 50 years old when one could no longer do heavy work as a priest under law.

However their bodies would have grown up much as our bodies do, but possibly not deteriorating so fast in middle age. If a pre-adamic child died, then presumably he was simply raptured early and he finished his schooling upstairs watching his brothers below. According to www.drmcdougall.com (the McDougall Newsletter January 2006 vol 5 number 1) ...

No prehistoric remains have been found of people older than 50 years. (This is also discussed in 'Anti-aging is an oxymoron' L. Hayflick, Journal of Gerontology 2004 June 59 (6): B573-6).

Yet we know that prehistoric man lived in communities and looked after their sick and injured so there is no environmental reason why he should not (in at least a few cases) have lived longer than 50 years were he genetically similar to modern man. So we put his lack of longevity down to his being raptured at 50 or before Furthermore the pre-adamics did not fight wars over territory as far as we know which indicates that they were aware that the earth was not all that there was. So fighting over your plot of land in the nursery school would have been seen as futile, given their future knowledge of the heavenly grammar school. The pre-adamics did not leave their father God or their mother the holy spirit, so they were not technology mad or warfare mad like us. When God made long garments of skin for Adam and for Eve (long lasting but ageing bodies), this was the first time he had done this. So the pre-adamics did not age destructively just as Adam and Eve originally did not age destructively.

So pre-adamic men were the first stage, the infant stage for the baby angels of the 6th creative day. After they were raptured, they then met their angelic parents, and we presume that they could take the spiritual salvation tests that the angels take. Finally consider the fascinating conversation between the Pharisees and Jesus when he admitted to a previous human existence...

56 Abraham your father rejoiced greatly in the prospect of seeing my day, and he saw it and rejoiced.
57 Therefore the Jews said to him: You are not yet 50 years old, and still you have seen Abraham?
58 Jesus said to them: Most truly I say to you, Before Abraham came into existence, I have been [in existence as a human] (John 8).

Verse 57 contains the unanswered binary question: You are not yet 50 years old, and still you have seen Abraham?

In the literal meaning no he did not see Abraham as Jesus who was murdered at 33½ years old by the Roman state having been condemned to death by the Pharisees and by the crowds of Jerusalem. But in the greater meaning, yes he saw him without being 50 years old because he spent less than 50 years in Enoch and he was one of the 3 men who visited him in Genesis 18, before Sodom was destroyed. Gabriel and Melchizedek were the other two. Furthermore as an angel he could see Abraham. But there must be a significance to the 50 years in the greater meaning, since it has no force in the literal meaning. This we think is that pre-adamics were raptured at 50 years old, from which point, since they were angels, they could all see Abraham when he was born. But every pre-adamic was effectively 50 years old as regards their human experience, whereas Jesus, who was not a pre-adamic, did not have 50 years of human experience behind him when he saw Abraham.

The fossil record shows that Pre-adamics did die or at least leave their bodies with broken legs etc. So it looks like there was no angelic hospital for them. In this way they would learn each one from his own and from his brother's frailty.

The 6th Creative Day

On the 5th creative 'day', God made the sea animals and on the 6th he made the land animals, pre-adamic man and Adam. These days were not literal days, but epochs as we discovered in I2. In fact each creative day lasted 14,400 years of 'real time' - see U234 on the research website.

All the animals are the constituent components of man from a behavioural standpoint. We are the sum of all animal behaviour. In the 6th day, when God created all the land animals, he was declaring the way that man would behave in this system. Animals behave the way they do by design. But humans can choose any one of the animalistic behavioural patterns, and we can choose the pattern of Jesus, the pattern of Abraham, the path of faith.

But look! The 6th day was a creative day, It was all a creative day up to the last minute of it when Adam sinned. So God was continuously creating us throughout the entire 14,400 real time years of the 6th creative day. So that is why we could not reproduce sexually. For sexual reproduction is a form of cloning, it is a mixing and a matching of existing genetic material, it is not creating anything new. But we were being continuously tweaked and improved during the 6th day. Every new human was in fact a new creation!! That is where the angelic involvement came in, that is why the pre-adamics were children really of the angels. It was still a creative day. 

In the 7th creative day, after 3993Nisan14 (see - I44), we could reproduce sexually, because nothing new was being made, we were just mixing and matching existing genetic material.

So the 6th creative day was the design process, a 14,400 year design process, and the 7th creative day was mass production, which in biological terms is reproduction.

So had the pre-adamics reproduced sexually, then their kids would not be new creations, so the creative day would have ended. So no they could not reproduce sexually.

What the 6th creative day was all about was the transition, the metamorphosis, from an animalistic being to a spiritual being. In that sense the lie of evolution is true. We did evolve from an animal. But not by sexual reproduction and natural selection. We evolved by continuous improvement in our design, making us more and more spiritual. And only when we were fully spiritual did God press the mass production button and allow us to reproduce sexually as the animals do. The 6th day was human prototype after human prototype.

Now we know what the angels were doing for 14,400 years. They were performing an interactive design process, taking man from an animal to a basic spiritual human, to very spiritual human. As regards the animals and the pre-adamic God called them 'good'. But as regards Adam, the super spiritual, super abstract thinking being, the spiritual equivalent of the angels themselves, God called him and his entire environment including the pre-adamics 'very good'.

25 And God proceeded to make the wild beast of the earth according to its kind and the domestic animal according to its kind and every moving animal of the ground according to its kind. And God got to see that [it was] good (Genesis 1).

31 After that God saw everything he had made and, look! [it was] very good. And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, a 6th day (Genesis 1).

Humans can imagine, we can simulate in our minds, we can think abstractly. The very thing that separates us from the animals, abstract thought, is the method of communication that the bible uses to teach us. The symbolism of the bible is the essence of spirituality. Language itself is an abstraction. A computer is not an 8 letter word it is a mechanical device. Satan is not a 5 letter word, he is the head of demonic mission control in the heavens. 

So we are all happy to make this one abstraction to get language. Animals cannot do this to any great extent. Chimps can do it a bit. But if we are prepared to make one abstraction to get a word, then should we not be prepared to make a second abstraction to get a symbolic meaning for that literal word? We do this anyway in regular speech. If a person is cool, this does not mean that he is poikilothermic, having a lower body temperature than the rest of us. It means that he is laid back, relaxed. This is a symbolic use of a literal word which is normally used for a physical temperature.

The bible just makes a few more symbolic uses of our vocabulary. We read it thinking, oh this is so symbolic how can I understand it? But really all language is a symbolic reference to reality in the first place, and many words have further symbolic meanings in regular speech. The bible just gives them a further Christian meaning.

HIRA

An article published by the BBC on October 29th 2005 reports that scientists have discovered a gene which makes normal sexually competent humans either sterile or fertile.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4377898.stm

http://www.bath.ac.uk/news/articles/research/timkarr251005.html

Apparently a man with good sperm and a woman with good eggs do not conceive unless the two gametes can do the right genetic dance when they meet. And the Choreographer of conception is the HIRA Gene. This gene determines the dance steps in fertilisation. If there is the slightest mutation or defect in the HIRA gene then the sperm treads on the toe of the egg during the genetic mating dance, and its no baby.

This is why some people are infertile today even though everything appears to be working normally. 

So scientists have just discovered a genetic mechanism that God designed to make humans fertile or infertile. Perhaps this gene was inactive in the pre-adamics.

Most mating behaviour in humans and animals involves a dance of some sort. And here God has our genes also doing a dance. We are so fractal, our very bodies declaring the molecular behaviour of our DNA. It would appear that pre-adamic man had two left feet however. 

Conclusion

Einstein said: Religion without science is blind, science without religion is lame.

Sir Isaac Newton believed that mankind owed it to God as a debt to search for his laws in his physical universe, the cosmos, and to search for his laws in his spiritual universe, the bible. He believed that Nature's Laws of motion which underpin the dynamics of all physical things had a spiritual equivalent in the bible. He believed that the bible was written in a code based upon laws. He was right, but he lived too early to be permitted to see the code.

The LWs agree with both of these fathers of modern science and maths. We have discovered that: True Science and True Religion are the same thing, a sincere search for God, in his various works. And further that True Art and True Religion are the same thing, a successful communication to a human audience of what we have discovered that God has given us. So a full and proper analysis of the Genesis creation account which reveals the two types of man that God and the angels created, fills the gap between archaeology and theology and resolves the conflict between the scientific priesthood and the religious priesthood.

Of course evolution and the missing link go straight out of the Window with a pre-adamic human race that could not procreate without angelic assistance! Every human being up until 6,000 years ago was created directly by the holy spirit, with two angelic parents and a surrogate human mother and a surrogate human father bound by a child rearing agreement.

Likewise the angelic manner of procreation is that a male angel and a female angel enter into a child rearing agreement of some kind and then go to the priest and ask for a child we imagine, by analogy with the pre-adamics. Then the holy spirit gives a child to the pair of them, without any pregnancy or female childbirth. Presumably this child has 'genetic' character traits from both parents. Then when the baby angel is born it has two surrogate parents to look after it, but really it is the child of God and the holy spirit. 

This may seem un-natural to us, but we are the enigma, we are the exception, we are the judicially dead people who procreate. It is our method of procreation that is abnormal. For truly we sons of Adam are surrogate parents all, to our children which properly belong to God. 

In summary, the pre-adamics, the post adamics, and the angels, all have surrogate children after the manner of the birth of Jesus Christ. None of those groups get married, but they have a temporary child rearing agreement for each God given child. And all adamic couples having non adamic children, have them after the manner of the birth of Jesus Christ. But the two surrogate parents are married in the case of the adamics. For marriage is the child rearing agreement for the dead. But the glory of gender is that it is our tutor in love for the non divine.

Only the dead reproduce sexually, the pre-adamics and the post adamics and the angels are infertile. But look how many barren women produced children in the scriptures...

Sarah was old and barren before the angel announced that she would give birth to Isaac. Rebekah was barren before God listened to the entreaties of Isaac her husband so that she conceived the twins, Esau and Jacob. Rachel was barren for years and for 10 sons to Jacob her husband, before God finally opened her womb and gave her Joseph. Manoah's wife was barren before the angel with the wonderful name announced to her and to her husband that she would give birth to Samson.

18 However, Jehovah's angel said to him: Just why should you ask about my name, when it is a wonderful one [it was Gabriel, the angel who anounces births, whose name means: Able bodied man of God]?

Zechariah's wife, Elizabeth, was old and barren before Gabriel told Zechariah that she would have John the baptist. All of these similar accounts are saying something about sons of God coming from barren women. They are telling us that angels and pre-adamics and all those born again with associated angels in the kingdom have children by the grace of God, not by their own reproductive powers. It is only the sons of Adam who have them by sexual reproduction. 

So now we can see what Isaiah really meant when he said...

1 Cry out joyfully, you barren woman that did not give birth! Become cheerful with a joyful outcry and cry shrilly, you that had
no childbirth pains, for the sons of the desolated one are more numerous than the sons of the woman with a husbandly owner, Jehovah has said (Isaiah 54).

Or as Paul said...

26 But the Jerusalem above is free and she is our mother.
27 For it is written: Be glad, you barren woman who does not give birth; break out and cry aloud, you woman who does not have childbirth pains; for the children of the desolate woman are more numerous than [those] of her who has the husband (Galatians 4).

The daughters of Adam reproduce by being fertile and getting married and having childbirth pains. But the daughters of God who are barren and do not get married, cry out with joy for they have more children than their dead sisters. Amen. 

The pre-adamic women gave birth, and had birth pains which were less than their adamic sisters, who suffer along with Eve. And the female post adamic saints in the new system will likewise give birth with reduced birth pains like their pre-adamic sisters, being free of the punishment of Eve. But the daughters of God, the female angels, do not give birth, they are barren, they are reproductively desolated, they have no birth pains, and yet they have more children than all their human sisters!

First Century Christian Writings

When Salome asked: “How long will death prevail?” the Lord replied, “For as long as you women bear children. […] I have come to destroy the works of the female (Gospel of the Egyptians, fragments 1 and 2).

So when death ends childbirth will end.

Technical Note

The Word Symbolic meaning of Matthew 1 shows the ancestral tree From Jehovah to Jesus. So each angel had a surrogate father and a surrogate mother.

3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually (Hebrews 7).

This statement describes the creation of Melchizedek and of the pre-adamics and of the sons of God, the angels and the non adamic humans as being like that of Jesus, which was with parents and genealogy, although all of these were not strict genetic descendants of their parents, since they were not created by sexual reproduction. But in the case of Melchizedek, who was born as Jared, and then came into a second body as Melchizedek, the king of Salem, this second body must have had no genealogy. It must have been a shelf body of some sort, like a temporary angel.

[6]  Who were Adam and Eve?

The writer used to believe that Adam stood for 'all prehistoric men' and Eve stood for 'all prehistoric women' and that these two kind of evolved into modern man but with some help from God. In fact Pope Paul II apparently had a similar belief, the belief that God kind of helped out with evolution. This was because the biblical story of Adam and Eve seems at first sight to be too naive and too simplistic to be literally true. Modern sophisticated man who believes that we arrived here through evolution and who knows that mankind existed before Adam finds the biblical account of our creation to be somewhat lacking in credibility.

But such a view is incorrect for the following two reasons at the least. Firstly God is more intelligent than us, so it is inconceivable that we would know more about our creation than he does, so his book must reflect this knowledge gap. Secondly, God evidently requires us to work for our physical food and likewise he requires us to work for our spiritual food. In other words we need to decode Genesis, we need to unravel it, to fully understand our beginning as a species. 

We are now going to take you through 3 realisations.

[A]   Adam and Eve were real people, a man and a woman.

[B]   Adam was created in precisely the same way that Jesus was created.

[C] Eve was created from a fully grown pre-adamic person

[A] Adam and Eve were real people, a man and a woman

23 Furthermore, Jesus himself, when he commenced [his work], was about 30 years old, being the son, as the opinion was, of Joseph, [son] of Heli, [who was Mary's father]
24 [son] of Matthat, [Mary's mother's father]
[son] of Levi, [Mary's mother's mother's father] 
[son] of Melchi, [This is the maternal line]
[son] of Jannai,
[son] of Joseph,
25 [son] of Mattathias,
[son] of Amos,
[son] of Nahum,
[son] of Esli,
[son] of Naggai,
26 [son] of Maath,
[son] of Mattathias,
[son] of Semein,
[son] of Josech,
[son] of Joda,
27 [son] of Joanan,
[son] of Rhesa,
[son] of Zerubbabel,
[son] of Shealtiel,
[son] of Neri,
28 [son] of Melchi,
[son] of Addi,
[son] of Cosam,
[son] of Elmadam,
[son] of Er,
29 [son] of Jesus,
[son] of Eliezer,
[son] of Jorim,
[son] of Matthat,
[son] of Levi,
30 [son] of Symeon,
[son] of Judas,
[son] of Joseph,
[son] of Jonam,
[son] of Eliakim,
31 [son] of Melea,
[son] of Menna,
[son] of Mattatha,
[son] of Nathan,
[son] of David [maternal and paternal lines merge],
32 [son] of Jesse,
[son] of Obed,
[son] of Boaz,
[son] of Salmon,
[son] of Nahshon,
33 [son] of Amminadab,
[son] of Arni,
[son] of Hezron,
[son] of Perez,
[son] of Judah,
34 [son] of Jacob,
[son] of Isaac,
[son] of Abraham,
[son] of Terah,
[son] of Nahor,
35 [son] of Serug,
[son] of Reu,
[son] of Peleg,
[son] of Eber,
[son] of Shelah,
36 [son] of Cainan,
[son] of Arpachshad,
[son] of Shem,
[son] of Noah,
[son] of Lamech,
37 [son] of Methuselah,
[son] of Enoch,
[son] of Jared,
[son] of Mahalaleel,
[son] of Cainan,
38 [son] of Enosh,
[son] of Seth,
[son] of Adam,
[son] of God (Luke 3).

All of these ancestors were real human beings (except God). So Adam was a real human being. This line has 77 characters in it from Jesus to God inclusive. This is actually the maternal line, with each woman represented by her husband. The maternal line merges with the paternal line at King David.

The Paternal line from Abraham to Jesus is described in Matthew 1...

1 The book of the history of Jesus Christ, son of David, son of Abraham:
2 Abraham became father to Isaac; Isaac became father to Jacob; Jacob became father to Judah and his brothers;
3 Judah became father to Perez and to Zerah by Tamar; Perez became father to Hezron; Hezron became father to Ram;
4 Ram became father to Amminadab; Amminadab became father to Nahshon; Nahshon became father to Salmon;
5 Salmon became father to Boaz by Rahab; Boaz became father to Obed by Ruth; Obed became father to Jesse;
6 Jesse became father to David the king. David became father to Solomon by the wife of Uriah...

15 Eliud became father to Eleazar. Eleazar became father to Matthan. Matthan became father to Jacob.
16 Jacob became father to Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ (Matthew 1).

These two lines of ancestral descent prove that Adam was a real human. Here are some other shorter biblical proofs

45 It is even so written: The first man Adam became a living soul. The last Adam became a life-giving spirit (1 Corinthians 15).

A living soul is a human being. Jesus, the last Adam, was certainly a human being. Therefore the first Adam from whom Jesus descends must also have been a human being. 

1 Now Adam had intercourse with Eve his wife and she became pregnant. In time she gave birth to Cain and said: I have
produced a man with the aid of Jehovah (Genesis 4).

Since Adam made Eve pregnant and since she gave birth to a son, both of them must have been human.

[B]  Adam was created in precisely the same way that Jesus was created

7 And Jehovah God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man came to be a living soul.
8 Further, Jehovah God planted a garden in Eden, toward the east, and there he put the man whom he had formed (Genesis 2).

So the man was formed before he was put into the garden. Where was he before this? Was he all by himself? Was he nowhere? Well we know from I5, that outside the garden were the pre adamic humans. So the formation process for Adam was rather more involved than the brief description above. 

14 Nevertheless, death ruled as king from Adam down to Moses, even over those who had not sinned after the likeness of the transgression by Adam, who bears a resemblance to him that was to come [Jesus] (Romans 5:14).

A striking resemblance in fact. Notice that St. Paul, the author of most of the epistles, did not say: Who 'bore' a resemblance, he said: Who 'bears', present tense, a resemblance. This means that Adam is living to Paul. For Jesus used this very verbal tense argument to the Sadducees to show them that Abraham was living to God. 

31 As regards the resurrection of the dead, did you not read what was spoken to you by God, saying,
32 I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob? He is the God, not of the dead, but of the living (Matthew 22).

Now as we saw above, Paul called Jesus, the last Adam...

45 It is even so written: The first man Adam became a living soul. The last Adam became a life-giving spirit (1 Corinthians 15).

Now if Jesus was the last Adam, then Adam was the first Jesus. Therefore Adam was born to a surrogate mother and father as was Jesus. Paul says further that Jesus gave himself a corresponding ransom for all...

6 Who gave himself a corresponding ransom for all [this is] what is to be witnessed to at its own particular times (1 Timothy 2:6).

Jesus, as regards his immaculate conception, corresponded to Adam, the one whom he ransomed, thereby releasing all of his children from the one and only death sentence on them. We are all under the death sentence passed and eventually executed upon Adam - see I10. Now if there is a first and a last, then there must be one or more others in between then for otherwise Jesus would have been called the second Adam. In fact there were 14 others in between them see I21. 

The first Adam was God's son born by immaculate conception to a surrogate mother, and so was Jesus. Adam had a pre-adamic surrogate mother, but truly had God and the Holy Spirit as his parents. Jesus had an adamic surrogate mother and likewise had God and the Holy Spirit as his parents. The first Adam was weaned and brought up until the age of 11 by pre adamic and angelic parents. These guys were not Neanderthals, but modern man. However they had not invented writing or the wheel and had not domesticated the horse and had not achieved very much at that time - see U1. However God took over the schooling of Adam once he was 11 years old, when he left the custody of his pre-adamic parent and entered the Garden of Eden under the custody of God - see U41.

Jesus on the other hand appeared before the Pharisees aged 11 by our reckoning but aged 12 by Hebrew reckoning.

41 Now his parents were accustomed to go from year to year to Jerusalem for the festival of the passover.
42 And when he became 12 years old, they went up according to the custom of the festival
43 and completed the days. But when they were returning, the boy Jesus remained behind in Jerusalem, and his parents did not notice it.
44 Assuming that he was in the company traveling together, they covered a day's distance and then began to hunt him up among the relatives and acquaintances.
45 But, not finding him, they returned to Jerusalem, making a diligent search for him.
46 Well, after 3 days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the teachers and listening to them and questioning them (Luke 2).

We have discovered from the bible code - see U41, that the correspondence between the Adam and Jesus is not only that they were both born by immaculate conception. Their lives also followed the same timetable. Adam sinned and left the garden and presumably returned to his pre-adamic parent when he was 33½ years old. And Jesus was murdered and paid for Adam's sin and returned to his heavenly parents at precisely the same age 33½ years old. Adam failed a test and thereby condemned us after 33½ years. Whereas Jesus passed a test and thereby saved us after 33½ years.

So now we can see that the 'dust from the ground' (Genesis 2:7), from which Adam was formed was the pre-adamics. For consider this promise that God made to Abraham...

16 And I will constitute your seed like the dust particles of the earth, so that, if a man could be able to count the dust particles of the earth, then your seed could be numbered (Genesis 13).

So Jacob, the chosen seed of Abraham was formed from the dust particles of the earth as was Adam!

[C] Eve was created from a fully grown pre-adamic person

The situation with Eve is slightly more complicated. Keep an eye of the incidences of 'the man' and 'man', and notice that God took only one rib but Eve is said to be bone of Adam's bones (plural)... 

21 Hence Jehovah God had a deep sleep fall upon the man and, while he was sleeping, he took one of his ribs and then closed up the flesh over its place.
22 And Jehovah God proceeded to build the rib that he had taken from the man into a woman and to bring her to the man.
23 Then the man said:

This is at last bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh
This one will be called Woman, because from Man this one was taken (Genesis 2:23)

So here we are told that Eve was taken not from 'the man' who is Adam, but from 'man' who is mankind in general. So she started off as a pre-adamic person.

We know too that God took Adam's rib and formed it into Eve. This is a symbolic statement. A rib is a part of the skeletal structure of the human body. So the rib stands for the structure of the human body, which today we know is a genetic structure. So using Adam's rib to recreate Eve is giving Eve the same genetic structure as Adam had. This is giving her a non ageing physical body like Adam originally had before he sinned. 

Now we know that Eve appeared before Adam as a fully formed woman. So what must have happened was this: God picked a nice attractive pre-adamic person for Adam. He then zapped that persons Genes so that she became female and so that her body became indefinitely living as Adam's was (this being the application of Adam's rib to her, so that she became bone of his bones, gene of his genes). It is interesting that she was not said to be bone of his rib, or bone of his bone, but bone of his bones (plural). This tells us that it was not just the rib but rather a feature of the rib, which feature is common to all bones that God used to create Eve. Such a feature was most likely the bone marrow, which is common to all bones and which produces blood cells, which God uses to represent life. 

23 Simply be firmly resolved not to eat the blood [do not eat living blood cells, dead blood cells represent nothing], because the blood is the soul and you must not eat the soul with the flesh (Deuteronomy 12).

After all the purpose of blood is to keep cells alive. So upgraded bone means upgraded bone marrow, which means upgraded blood, which means upgraded life, which is indefinite life, which is life in a non ageing body. 

God actually gave her the body that she will have in the Kingdom of God. Some body huh? No wonder he fell for her! The rib from Adam The situation was slightly more complicated than this...

She was baptised not in the blood of Adam but in the bone, the rib of Adam, more like in the bone marrow of Adam. As a result of this baptism Eve was emptied of her original DNA and was made a female genetic clone of Adam. That made her really "the rib" and bones from his bones. And it gave her an indefinitely lasting body, as Adam's was (like she would have objected!). 

So as Paul would say, Just as Eve resulted from the temporary death (the deep sleep) of Adam, so the first century church, the bride of Christ, resulted from the temporary death of Jesus.

Here is a nice table of correspondence between the birth of Eve, Adam's wife and the birth of the New covenant saints, Jesus' wife. This table involves advanced symbolism if you do not understand or accept it at this point then please refer back to it after you have read past section I31:

[6a] The Gory Detail of Original Sin

Here is the scriptural account...

1 Now the serpent [Satan having come down in human form and seducing Eve using the tactics of a snake] proved to be the most cautious of all the wild beasts of the field [he became the most cunning of the angels who reject outright God's authority] that Jehovah God had made. So it began to say to the woman [Eve]: Is it really so that God said you must not eat from every tree of the garden?
2 At this the woman said to the serpent: Of the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat.
3 But as for [eating] of the fruit of the tree that is in the middle of the garden, God has said, 'You must not eat from it, no, you must not touch it that you do not die.'
4 At this the serpent said to the woman: You [plural] positively will not die.
5 For God knows that in the very day of your eating from it your eyes are bound to be opened and you are bound to be like God, knowing good and bad.
6 Consequently the woman saw that the tree was good for food [the literal tree and tasy literal food upon it] and that it was something to be longed for to the eyes [the tree and its fruit were good looking], yes, the tree was desirable to gain wisdom [literally eating would give her wisdom] [lyk#h]. So she began taking of its fruit and eating it. Afterward she gave some also to her husband when with her and he began eating it.
7 Then the eyes of both of them became opened [they understood the game that Satan had played with them and they woke up sexually too] and they began to realize that they were naked [both physically, since they had discovered the power of the lower regions and spiritually since they began to appreciate their moral naivety]. Hence they sewed fig leaves together and made loin coverings for themselves (Genesis 3).

43 Why is it you do not know what I am speaking? Because you cannot listen to my word.
44 you are from your father the Devil, and you wish to do the desires of your father. That one was a manslayer [he did not murder Eve because she also had an angelic body. He did kill her human body, so he was a manslayer] when he began, and he did not stand fast in the truth, because truth is not in him [although he was in the truth until he turned to the lie]. When he speaks the lie, he speaks according to his own disposition, because he is a liar and the father of [the lie] (John 8).

He who has been created is beautiful [any angel, and child born to living parents], but you would <not> find his sons [begotten sons such as the Nephilim] noble creations. If he were not created, but begotten, you would find that his seed was noble [Abraham was begotton but his seed is noble]. But now he was created (and) he begot [Satan did this with Eve. Eve could only beget after she sinned, since begetting by sexual reproduction is the preserve of the dead. God allows people to have children without his consent only if these children are dead. So first Satan enticed Eve to sin and die judicailly as a human but not as an angel. Then he slept with her and made her pregnant then he conspired with her to murder Adam who lost his human soul and his angelic soul. Eve never lost her angelic soul and so was not murdered. Actually Eve did not die, she was raptured when her human body gave out, since she had an angelic soul and was not baptized into a covenant that required death]. What nobility is this? First, adultery came into being, afterward murder [Satan first seduced Eve and committed adultery with her not because she was married to or engaged to Adam, but because he was an angel and she was a human as explained below]. And he [Cain] was begotten in adultery, for he was the child of the Serpent [Satan came down in human form to seduce Eve, and Cain was carried and delivered by Eve]. So he became a murderer/manslayer, just like his father, and he killed his brother [Abel]. Indeed, every act of sexual intercourse which has occurred between those unlike one another is 'adultery'/necrozoan bestiality [Satan mating with Eve was adultery of this type. It is a living being having illegal procreative sex with a dead being. The dead beget within marriage, the living create within a child rearing agreement. The two should not cross fertilise each other]. (Philip - gnostic writings)

Now the trees were real trees and Eve was a real woman but the snake was plainly not a real snake because real snakes cannot talk. The first naive solution to this problem is to say that the snake was used as a ventriloquists dummy by Satan, but the Gnostic writing shows that Satan commited Adultery with Eve, something that he could not have achieved as a snake. Furthermore Eve declaring that she had produced Cain with the aid of Jehovah and not with Adam, and Cain not being Adam's seed but Abel being such confirms that Cain was a physical son of Satan, begotton by Satan and Eve.

Now marriage is an institution for the dead, so Adam and Eve were not married in the garden, and actually they could not have procreated in the garden they could only have created a child on God's behalf since both were living. So Satan did not sin against Adam in adultery, but he did sin against the first holy spirit covenant which he mediated. So he was unfaithful as God's wife. This actually destroyed the first holy spirit covenant and God lost his first wife as so many humans do today.

He also committed what we call necrozoan bestiality with Eve, since he was judicially living and she was judicially dead at the time that they begat Cain, and the living should not beget, they must create on behalf of God.

This of course was the great attraction to Satan. He was not interested in giving God any more children, he wanted children of his own to whom he could be God. So he needed Even to sin in order that she would be able to beget, to procreate without a consent being required from an angelic priesthood. Satan would then become the father of a human race through Cain, rather than God being their father through Adam. So he perusaded Eve to sin, then he persuade her to sleep with him, and then she perusaded Adam to sin by sleeping with him.

So Satan began as a manslayer of Eve, not a murderer of her, since she had a second angelic body at her disposal. And he began as a liar, telling her that 'they' would not die. Actually Eve did not die judicially since she had no idea that she was committing adultery and since she was decieved by Satan who lied to her.

14 Also, Adam was not deceived, but the woman was thoroughly deceived and came to be in transgression (1 Timothy 2).

Eve herself was only under the law of do not eat from the tree, so she was not guilty of adultery. And in any event she had no idea what adultery was since marriage had not yet ever occurred since no human had yet died judicially. So she was absolutely nowhere with this stuff, and must have been well suprised when she discovered that sex lead to pregnancy, something that was not the case with pre-adamics.

Cain was therefore a cross breed really, the first Nephilim, and he could procreate and therefore so could the Nephilim.

But Adam did die in both of his bodies as a result of his sin (and is still dead today), so since Satan told Eve that both of them would positively not die, he lied in respect of Adam.

[7]  The way the bible is written: Genesis 4, John 3 and the sons of Jacob

Here is a simple rhetorical question for the reader. Is mankind more intelligent than God or is God more intelligent than mankind?

We have seen in section I5 on pre-adamic man, that the bible is written in a very intelligent way, and of course Jesus said that it was so written...

18 For truly I say to you that sooner would heaven and earth pass away than for one smallest letter or one particle of a letter to pass away from the Law [of God, the whole bible] by any means and not all things take place (Matthew 5).

Since the bible is written intelligently and diligently, we have to read it intelligently and diligently. Here are 3 examples of how intelligently it is written and how intelligently we need to read it. First impressions of bible accounts are often incorrect. The holy spirit will wrong foot you if you do not think about every word in the account and put the entire jigsaw together. Our experience is that pretty much every time you revisit an account you see something in it that you did see before.

[A]  Cain and Abel

[B]  The first 6 sons of Jacob

[C]  No man has ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven

[A]  Cain and Abel

2 And Abel came to be a herder of sheep, but Cain became a cultivator of the ground.
3 And it came about at the expiration of some time that Cain proceeded to bring some fruits of the ground as an offering to Jehovah.
4 But as for Abel, he too brought some firstlings of his flock, even their fatty pieces. Now while Jehovah was looking with favor upon Abel and his offering, 
5 he did not look with any favor upon Cain and upon his offering. And Cain grew hot with great anger, and his countenance began to fall.
6 At this Jehovah said to Cain: Why are you hot with anger and why has your countenance fallen?
7 If you turn to doing good, will there not be an exaltation? But if you do not turn to doing good, there is sin crouching at the entrance, and for you is its craving; and will you, for your part, get the mastery over it?
8 After that Cain said to Abel his brother: Let us go over into the field. So it came about that while they were in the field Cain proceeded to assault Abel his brother and kill him.
(Genesis 4).

Q:  Why did God accept Abel’s sacrifice and yet reject Cain’s sacrifice?

The standard answer is:

A: Because Abel offered his sacrifice with faith, but Cain had the wrong attitude and offered his sacrifice without faith.

Or even worse an answer of the type:

A: Obviously Cain did not have any faith because look what he did after his sacrifice!

Both of these answers are entirely wrong and all modern churches to our knowledge have spectacularly failed to answer this holy poser from God. This question is easy to answer if you understand what sacrifice is all about. In fact the question could just as well be phrased as: What is a sacrifice? To answer this, consider the famous words of Samuel:

22 To obey is better than a sacrifice, to pay attention than the fat of rams (1 Samuel 15).

Obviously avoiding the sin that requires the sacrifice is better than sinning and then making a sacrifice to pay for that sin. So sacrifice comes about because of disobedience. So sacrifices existed to teach us about obedience. With this in mind ask yourself this next question...

Q: How many unspecified sacrifices did God ever prescribe for the Jews?

Or ask yourself this question...

Q: Did God ever say to the sons of Israel bring along whatever you like and I’ll judge your offering on its merit?

A: None and No.

Every sacrifice under the Law was precisely prescribed by God as to the offering itself, the day of offering and even the method of making the offering. Take for example the regulations for the festival of Weeks under the Law of Moses...

16 To the day after the seventh sabbath you should count, 50 days, and you must present a new grain offering to Jehovah.
17 Out of your dwelling places you should bring 2 loaves as a wave offering. Of 2 tenths of an ephah of fine flour they should prove to be. They should be baked leavened, as first ripe fruits to Jehovah.
18 And you must present along with the loaves 7 sound male lambs, each a year old, and one young bull and 2 rams. They should serve as a burnt offering to Jehovah along with their grain offering and their drink offerings as an offering made by fire, of a restful odor to Jehovah.
19 And you must render up one kid of the goats as a sin offering and 2 male lambs, each a year old, as a communion sacrifice.
20 And the priest must wave them to and fro along with the loaves of the first ripe fruits, as a wave offering before Jehovah, along with the 2 male lambs. They should serve as something holy to Jehovah for the priest (Leviticus 23).

As you can see the sacrifice was defined precisely by God. This was because he was trying to teach obedience through sacrifice, he was not trying to teach sacrifice itself.

For example if God specified a kid of the goats, and someone brought along a whole herd of cattle, would that be acceptable? Or if God stipulated an unblemished lamb, and someone presented a picasso, a ferarri and a prize winning Dalmatian to the high priest, how far would that get him? If God stipulated a turtle dove and someone brought along the rights to the whole Beatles back catalogue, would that work for God?

The reason that God does not explicitly say why he rejected Cain’s sacrifice and accepted Abel’s sacrifice is that if you understand what sacrifice is supposed to be about, and if you credit God with being fair, you will work out for yourself that Cain offered the wrong sacrifice. The point is that God wants you to think about it and work it out for yourself. And if you are not prepared to do that, then he does not want to show you his true love and he does not want to show you his true justice. God does not want to explain himself to his enemies, he wants to explain himself only to his friends. Because his enemies abuse divine knowledge for their own benefit. So he keeps them in the dark to lessen their destructive effects. This was also why Jesus said to his disciples at one point: You can either drink my blood or take a hike!

53 Accordingly Jesus said to them: Most truly I say to you: Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in yourselves (John 6). 

He knew that such a statement was revolting to the Jews under Law, but he made no qualification that in fact they would have only to drink wine which represents his blood, because he was testing them to weed out those who had seen all of his miracles but continued to put no faith in him. John 6 was a faith test by Jesus of his disciples. Genesis 4 is a love test by God of the reader.

Now modern churches do not understand sacrifice to God. They understand self sacrifice, which is giving God what they want to give him, but they do not understand sacrifice to God, which is giving God want he wants to be given.

God could not possibly have accepted Abel’s sacrifice unless Abel had offered him precisely what he had prescribed, and on the correct day. So since God did accept Abel’s sacrifice, we know that he must have stipulated to the pair of them that they should both bring:

4 Some firstlings of the flock even their fatty pieces (Genesis 4).

Cain brought 'some fruits of the ground'. That was not what God asked for, so he rejected it. That is the end of the matter. But in fact the ground was cursed due to Adam, so Cain added insult to disobedience and offered to God the fruits of his father’s disobedience! 

17 And to Adam he said: Because you listened to your wife's voice and took to eating from the tree concerning which I gave you this command, 'You must not eat from it,' cursed is the ground on your account. In pain you will eat its produce all the days of your life (Genesis 3).

29 And he proceeded to call his name Noah, saying: This one will bring us comfort from our work and from the pain of our hands resulting from the ground which Jehovah has cursed (Genesis 5).

3 Every moving animal that is alive may serve as food for you. As in the case of green vegetation, I do give it all to you (Genesis 9).

21 And Jehovah began to smell a restful odour, and so Jehovah said in his heart: Never again shall I call down evil upon the ground on man's account, because the inclination of the heart of man is bad from his youth up; and never again shall I deal every living thing a blow just as I have done (Genesis 8).

But that blooper was not why the sacrifice was rejected. It was rejected quite simply because it was the wrong sacrifice.

Furthermore men are incapable of judging faith, we can only judge works. So we are simply not in a position to judge either Cain or Abel as to their faith. In fact under the law of works, if you absolutely hated God and the high priest and your brother and had just finished bullying your entire family yet brought along the correct sacrifice, possibly to show off to your peers, then your sins were forgiven.

The purpose of Sacrifice to God is to humiliate the sacrificer and to glorify God. One does not bring to the altar of God one’s latest screenplay or the fruits of one’s commercial success, in order to get a pat on the back or an Oscar or the Queens award for industry or the medal of freedom from the High Priest. One brings instead something pointing forward to the sacrifice of Jesus, so that God can give him the Oscar that he deserves. As for our efforts, they are not worthy of consideration when compared to the sacrifice and love and righteousness of the Christ and his father.

[B]  The first 6 sons of Jacob

Here is the Genesis account of the birth of the first 6 sons of Jacob.

31 When Jehovah came to see that Leah was hated, he then opened her womb, but Rachel was barren.
32 And Leah became pregnant and brought a son to birth and then called his name Reuben, for she said: It is because Jehovah has looked upon my wretchedness, in that now my husband will begin to love me.
33 And she became pregnant again and brought a son to birth and then said: It is because Jehovah has listened, in that I was hated and so he gave me also this one. Hence she called his name Simeon.
34 And she became pregnant yet again and brought a son to birth and then said: Now this time my husband will join himself to me, because I have borne him 3 sons. His name was therefore called Levi.
35 And she became pregnant once more and brought a son to birth and then said: This time I shall laud Jehovah. She therefore called his name Judah. After that she left off giving birth (Genesis 29).
1 When Rachel came to see that she had borne nothing to Jacob, Rachel got jealous of her sister and began to say to Jacob: Give me children or otherwise I shall be a dead woman.
2 At this Jacob's anger burned against Rachel and he said: Am I in the place of God, who has held back the fruit of the belly from you?
3 So she said: Here is my slave girl Bilhah. Have relations with her, that she may give birth upon my knees and that I, even I, may get children from her.
4 With that she gave him Bilhah her maidservant as wife, and Jacob had relations with her.
5 And Bilhah became pregnant and in time bore Jacob a son.
6 Then Rachel said: God has acted as my judge and has also listened to my voice, so that he gave me a son. That is why she called his name Dan.
7 And Bilhah, Rachel's maidservant, became pregnant once more and in time bore a second son to Jacob.
8 Then Rachel said: With strenuous wrestlings I have wrestled with my sister. I have also come off winner! So she called his name Naphtali.
9 When Leah came to see that she had left off giving birth, she proceeded to take Zilpah her maidservant and to give her to Jacob as wife (Genesis 30).

At first sight it looks like Leah gave birth to Reuben, Simeon, Levi and Judah, then Bilhah, Rachel's maidservant, gave birth to Dan and Naphtali. As a result all Jewish theologians and all Christian churches today have the birth order of these sons as Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Dan Naphtali.

But there is one little piece of the puzzle that this interpretation misses. When Bilhah gave birth to her second son Rachel said: With strenuous wrestlings I have wrestled with my sister. I have also come off winner!

Agreed, most but not all bible interpretations are made by men, and we are not normally that interested in the noises women make when they are giving birth, or in the things that they say during that process, which may not be very complimentary. But it was not Bilhah who called her second born child Naphtali, it was Rachel. And Rachel herself did not give birth being unable at that time to conceive. Incidentally according to the law back then (before the law of Moses), Bilhah, the maidservant, was owned by Rachel, and so Rachel also owned her children, and so could name them herself.

So here is the 64 million dollar question: Why would Rachel think that she was the winner in the procreation race with her sister at the birth of Naphtali?

Answer: She had one more child than Leah at that time. 

Obviously Rachel would have realised that she was losing the baby race straight after Reuben was born. She would not have needed to see 4 children from Leah before she started competing with her sister. So the birth order must have been...

Reuben, Dan, Naphtali, Simeon, Levi, Judah.

In this way Rachel drew level at one all with the birth of Dan, and then went one baby ahead at 2:1 with the birth of Naphtali. At this point she was in the lead, she was the winner for a while. But then Leah came back with Simeon, the equaliser and it was 2 all. Then with the births of Levi and Judah, Leah went 4:2 ahead. 

[C]  No man has ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven

13 Moreover, no man has ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven, the Son of man.

If no man has ascended into heaven except the son of man who descended, then the son of man had already ascended before he said this statement. So Jesus, the son of man, had ascended to heaven before he descended as Jesus. But if he had ascended to heaven before he descended as Jesus, then he must have descended as someone else before that ascension in order that he could actually ascend. For it is impossible to ascend into heaven without first descending from heaven. So Jesus had descended from heaven before and then ascended back and then he descended again and made the statement above.

In other words, when Jesus came to preach to the Jews and to give his life for all mankind, this was at least his second visit to us. In other words he had come here before as someone else, before Jesus.

This information is an earthquake, but it is merely one step of logic away from John 3:13 above. Why has mankind been unable to take that step? Because we throw away our logic when we join a church. We believe the lie perpetrated by control freak priests, that faith involves taking things on trust from a priest. It most certainly does not. It involves serving God with one's God given mind.

Search and see if any church other than the Lords' Witnesses has ever understood this one sentence!

Conclusion

The bible is brilliantly written and every little detail does contain a great spiritual gem, hidden for thousands of years. As Solomon said in his second Proverb...

4 if you keep seeking for it as for silver, and as for hid treasures you keep searching for it,
5 in that case you will understand the fear of Jehovah, and you will find the very knowledge of God (Proverbs 2).

The point is that you have to dig, you have to think logically about every scripture. God did not explicitly say why he rejected Cain's sacrifice, he did not directly list the birth order of Jacob's first 6 kids and Jesus did not flatly say that he had been down here before as somebody else, but the bible does say all three of these things if you read it with your whole mind. 

Hopefully this section will help the reader to lay bare the exuberance of the literary genius of our God. Hopefully he will begin to grasp the extent of the linguistic dexterity employed in his perfect book. For the king of the love freaks is a teacher whose moral finesse breaks your heart whilst his incisive metaphors wrench your neurons into divine activity. The very activity that Adam first taught to pre-adamic man, whom he was sent to save.

So the inescapable conclusion is that God wants us to think really hard and really deeply about every word of his book. He wants us to look behind the scriptures, to look through the scriptures, to look ahead of the scriptures to look beneath the scriptures and to look above the scriptures, to misquote General Norman Schwarzkopf in the first Gulf War. This is what a spiritual being is (not Stormy Norman, but a person who sees through the physical to the underlying spiritual truth). Spirituality is looking behind the physical with the eyes of the mind to the spiritual cause. The bible, by its very construction, is teaching us to see beyond the physical.

This divine teaching method does not only apply to the holy book. It applies to the entirety of creation as Isaac Newton believed. Let us therefore will present you with two key examples from nature of this type of thinking here. 

Why did God create Cancer? 

Why does God permit the terrible disease of Cancer to torture to mutilate and to kill his children whom he loves so much? Is it because God is a sick and cruel murderer? Is it because God is not very good at genetic engineering and made a few mistakes in our construction so that our DNA goes haywire occasionally? Or is it because any form of corruption (financial, moral, political etc) is ultimately terminal to society, if not eradicated completely. And we all know someone who has died of cancer, which is cellular corruption, but have we really learned this lesson! Does corruption have a future? So please understand that the death of a loved one to this disease is not a waste. In fact it is just as heroic and significant as a soldier dying in battle. The soldier died for his country or for his beliefs. The cancer victim dies for your beliefs and for the future of your society, which future is the Kingdom of God. That is the big picture. It is our understanding that God wishes to turn your memories of such deaths and of such suffering into an unforgettable moral lesson that will prevent you having any part in cancerous activity in the future. 

For the cancer victim himself, when he is resurrected, he will know for a fact that corruption is terminal. Whenever he sees it in others and whenever he is tempted to indulge in it himself, he will recall its effect on his first body and say. I am not going there.

Why did God create Opium and Cocaine? 

Why does God permit the terrible distress that results from class A drugs? Why does he permit such a terrible physical trap door to shadow our every step in life? Is it because God loves to see us lose our minds to an inanimate chemical? Does he revel in the subjugation of all of our emotions by a biochemical need? Or is it that any form of idolatry (worship of any person, any creed, any political system, any sporting team, any creation of man, any non divine creation of God, such as women, any financial instrument, any form of status, any form of sex or any lifestyle) is ultimately terminal to society, if not eradicated completely. And we all know someone who is addicted to a drug, which is biochemical idolatry, but we have none of us learned this lesson. Does idolatry have a future? Did God give us free will in order for us to give it away to a drug whether physical or metaphorical? Surely not. Idolatry is spiritual cancer, it corrupts your spiritual DNA.

[7a] Logical Pathways and One Step Thinking

Logical Proof that the bible is inspired by our creator/creating species

16 All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness (2 Timothy 3).

Sure the bible flat out says that it is inspired, but how do we know if that statement is the truth? Here is a logical pathway using the arguments of intro1 that proves that the bible was inspired by 'a species more advanced than humans'.

1.  The teachings of Jesus Christ in the Gospels portray a morality so radically different from the normal philosophy of man, and so loving and on reflection so self evidently correct, and yet so far from being implemented by mankind, that they must come from a source external to the human race who knows more about human nature than we do ourselves. They must therefore come from a more experienced more advanced species than man. So the book is inspired certainly by a more morally advanced species.

2.  The proven prophetic capability of the book again shows that comes from an external species since no man can see the future in the detail that the bible sees it. So the bible is inspired certainly by a less temporally restricted species.

16 And I will constitute your seed like the dust particles of the earth, so that, if a man could be able to count the dust particles of the earth, then your seed could be numbered (Genesis 13).

Today there are billions of people who claim a genetic or a spiritual descendancy from Abraham, be they Jews, Muslims of Christians. In fact nearly 50% of mankind would claim such a descendancy.

3.  The bible reveals the concept of quarantine, in the law of Moses, 3400 years before microbiology discovered bugs.

3 And the priest must look at the plague in the skin of the flesh. When the hair in the plague has turned white and the appearance of the plague is deeper than the skin of his flesh, it is the plague of leprosy. And the priest must look at it, and he must declare him unclean.
4 But if the blotch is white in the skin of his flesh and its appearance is not deeper than the skin and its hair has not turned white, the priest must then quarantine the plague 7 days.
5 And the priest must look at him on the seventh day, and if in the way it looks the plague has stopped, the plague has not spread in the skin, the priest must also quarantine him another 7 days (Leviticus 13).

This was legal isolation and inspection for protection from an infectious disease (a plague).

4.  The bible describes the in vitro fertilisation of Mary 1,960 years before IVF was invented by man.  Even if you do not believe that Mary conceived without sleeping with a man, the account nonetheless demonstrates that an external species had an understanding of this process over 1,900 years before mankind developed the process for itself.

18 But the birth of Jesus Christ was in this way. During the time his mother Mary was promised in marriage to Joseph, she was found to be pregnant by holy spirit before they were united (Matthew 1).

5   The bible describes the earth as circular 2,000 years before we realised that it wasn't flat, but was a Globe. 

22 There is one who is dwelling above the circle of the earth, the dwellers in which are as grasshoppers, the one who is stretching out the heavens just as a fine gauze, who spreads them out like a tent in which to dwell (Isaiah 40).

So the bible is inspired by a scientifically more advanced species than us.

6. The bible describes the earth as being hung upon nothing, 3500 years before Sir Isaac Newton discovered Gravity.

7 He is stretching out the north over the empty place, hanging the earth upon nothing (Job 26).

7.  The Law of Moses contains legal principles that are indisputably just and if applied would solve a lot of today's political problems. No nation has today or has ever had a more just set of laws. So the bible is inspired by a species with a better justice system than us.

8.  The bible is written in an incredible grammatical code, which uses the same set of words in an account to tell between 1 and 7 different stories - see code. No human is anywhere near being able to write in such a way. We have enough trouble understanding the code that has been written. So the bible is inspired by a species with a grasp of language which is much more advanced than ours.

So in conclusion the bible was inspired by a species that is more morally advanced than us, is less temporally restricted than us, is more scientifically advanced than us (both in biology and in astrophysics), has a better justice system than us and has a better grasp of language than us. So plainly the bible is inspired, by a vastly superior species. Although it is hard for a proud species such as ourselves to admit this possibility. This species also claims in scripture to have the capability to resurrect us, and because they plainly have a superior moral understanding we must deduce that they are not lying. Since they can resurrect us and perform IVF in the absence of a husband, they must be the species that created us. So the bible is inspired by our creator species

Do you believe that?

The above is a logical pathway. How much confidence do you put in it? 

The Courage of your Deductions

Pathways such as the above are actually the basis of spirituality. God did not introduce himself to pre-adamic man until we had developed the capability to see with our minds what we could not detect with our senses. The mind sees through logic. For example Sir Isaac Newton deduced from the fact that an apple fell towards the earth that an invisible force was attracting the apple to the earth. He could not physically detect that force, he could only deduce its existence from the physically detectable effect that it had on the apple. Newton saw gravity with his mind. That is precisely how one sees God today.

For example, suppose your non military friend left London at 10:30 am (London Time) and arrived in New York at 9:30 am (Eastern Time) the same day in 2004. You would deduce from this that he must have gone on Concorde.  There is absolutely no doubt about this at all, as mankind has no other non military way of achieving this. But how much confidence do you have in this deduction?

Your faith, your spirituality and your Christianity are all dependent on your confidence in such deductions because you cannot at this time see God or see Jesus himself. But if you have full confidence in your deductions, and if you familiarize yourself with the scriptures, then you can see the pair of them. The reason that God requires this effort on our part is to be found in I2.

Have you ever seen your own brain? Most readers will say no. So how do you know that you have got one? Well you deduce it from books and from the fact that you may have seen other people's brains or pictures of other people's brain's and you are the same species as them. But this reasoning is precisely the reasoning we used above to deduce that the bible was inspired by our creating species.

If you can develop confidence in your deductive powers, then you will see God, if you are pure in heart. By this we mean and Jesus meant, if you look without regard for personal consequence. Obviously if there is a God then you are accountable to him. Not everybody likes this idea. So many make a rather limited search for him, they put the telescope to their blind eye, an eye blinded by emotion, fear, religious brainwashing, commercial brainwashing etc.

The way to approach this is to first of all forget about consequences and just decide to search for the truth. If you can do this, then you are searching with a pure heart, you are judging without a motive. OK the consequences could theoretically be dire, but you are not considering them. In fact God is a better judge than anyone could possibly imagine and the consequences of discovering him can only ever be good. If he is not going to allow you into the Kingdom of God it is because that is the best thing for you, because you would not benefit from or be able to deal with that particular 'school'.

If you take this academic stance as regards the truth then you will experience for your self the freedom spoken about by John...

32 Know the truth, and the truth will set you free (John 8).

In other words, if you permit the truth to frighten you then you are being deceived, you are being cheated out of your inheritance and your spirit is being oppressed. Because the reality is that the truth can only empower you. After all it is nice to know what movie you are actually playing in. Only then can you properly choose the role that you wish to take in that film. 

Here are some examples of deductions that everyone has confidence in:

A Map

A map is not a reality, it is a symbolic representation, an abstraction, of the reality. We all trust maps. Most of us are confident that if we follow a route on a map we will indeed end up at the destination we seek, even though we may have never gone down that road before and may have never been to that destination before. The bible is such a map. It is just rather more symbolic in its representation and rather more abstract in its construction. And no human today has ever been to the destination which it gives the route for. But many people have never been to Stratfield Mortimer, that doesn't mean that the place doesn't exist, or that if you follow the appropriate road map you won't end up there.

Dinosaurs

Most people accept that many years ago Dinosaurs roamed over the earth. But no human has ever seen a Dinosaur. We just have bits of huge skeletons from which we deduce their existence. It is logic and confidence in our deductions that puts the flesh on those bones. We do not actually have any Dinosaur flesh to hand. Likewise we have the skeletal proof of the existence of God from the words of the bible and from nature itself. But logic and confidence in our deductions are required to categorically prove his existence. For logic and deduction are the flesh needed to create the body of God from the bones of nature and the bible. 

One Step Thinking

Sin is short termism, which is ignoring the consequences of your actions. Sin results from one step thinking. Christianity is basically two step thinking, thinking which takes account of the global consequences of actions when deciding whether or not to go ahead with them.

National Pollution Policy:

One Step Thinking: If we introduce strict anti pollution laws, then our companies will become less profitable so they will sack people and unemployment will rise.

Two Step Thinking: If we cut pollution, we will slow down global warming, so the climate will remain stable. Then the rain will fall evenly and slowly in the right places, rather than falling unevenly and quickly in the wrong places. Since the weather will remain predictable and consistent, we will not get unprecedented floods and droughts and hurricanes, so farming won't fail worldwide, so we won't all starve. (Alright it is a few more than 2 steps! more like 5 steps!)

Self Interest:

One Step Thinking: I want this, I don't care what anyone else feels about it, I am having this because that is what I want.

Two Step Thinking: Everything I want is presently owned by someone else. My welfare is dependent upon others. They also have the same needs and desires as me. If we co-operate as a team we will both reach attain these desires and needs more quickly. So my plan to achieve my goals has to complement other peoples plans to achieve their goals, in other words I'll have to do a deal.

Profit before people:

One Step Thinking: Close down the coal industry in the UK because you can buy cheaper coal from Germany.

Two Step Thinking: The cost of closing down our coal industry to the UK as an economy, in terms of lost jobs, unemployment benefit, lost utility revenues, lost factory rents, lost tax revenue, lost bank profits, lost shop profits, psychological demotivation of people etc. is much greater than the marginal difference between German coal prices and UK coal prices. So we are better off subsidising UK coal. Obviously the Germans understand this and have implemented a policy of subsidy which is based on two stage thinking. In the 1980s the UK was buying German coal which was inferior in quality to ours and which costed more to mine than ours but was subsidised to a greater extent.

The UN:

One Step Thinking: The world is becoming one place, lets have one world wide government to make the world a fairer place.

Two Step thinking: Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. After the UN becomes the worldwide government, all of the power being in the hands of one government will be catastrophic. The UN itself will become like an African dictator answerable to no one and so it will inevitably become completely corrupt. We need a worldwide judge yes, for human rights issues, a worldwide social service yes, and worldwide health service yes, but a worldwide king with a worldwide army - NO. That would be the worst and most corrupt form of global police state.

Democracy:

One Step Thinking: Lets ask everyone what they want and give it to them in a political system - Democracy.

Two Step Thinking: Peoples individual desires are not as important as their collective needs. We need a political system which gives people not what they want but what they need. We may all want chocolate pudding, but what we need is protein and greens. To ensure that all people get what they need, which is a job, a house, healthcare, schooling for everyone, moral guidance, security (protein and greens), we need to do things that people don't want us to do, and so would never vote for. So we need to educate people so that they understand how to fulfill collective needs and so that they value these needs as much as they value their own personal wants. This education is Christianity. Christianity is not your sticky toffee pudding, it is your protein and your greens. But if you eat up all your greens then you'll get your sticky toffee pudding in the Kingdom of God!

[9]  What is a Soul? What is a Spirit?

Here are the pieces of the Jigsaw from God which defines for us the meaning of the word 'soul':

44 It is sown a physical body (literally in Greek - a soulical body), it is raised up a spiritual body. If there is a physical/soulical body, there is also a spiritual one.
45 It is even so written: The first man Adam became a living soul. The last Adam became a life-giving spirit (1 Corinthians 15).

So there is a physical body and there is a spiritual body.

13 Everyone touching a corpse, the soul of whatever man may die, and who will not purify himself, has defiled Jehovah's tabernacle, and that soul must be cut off from Israel. Because the water for cleansing has not been sprinkled upon him, he continues unclean. His uncleanness is still upon him (Numbers 19).

11 And he should not come to any dead soul. For his father and his mother he may not defile himself (Leviticus 21).

A dead soul is a soul without the spirit. A dead soul is a body.

18 And the result was that as her soul was going out, because she died, she called his name Ben-on, but his father called him Benjamin (Genesis 35:18).

4 The soul that is sinning it itself will die (Ezekiel 18).

So a soul can die. In fact the soul dies when the human dies. When it dies it becomes a body. A human soul can eat also...

16 And on the first day there is to take place for you a holy convention, and on the seventh day a holy convention. No work is to be done on them. Only what every soul needs to eat, that alone may be done for you (Exodus 12:16).

Humans can kill human souls...

22 And in case men should struggle with each other and they really hurt a pregnant woman and her children do come out but no fatal accident occurs, he is to have damages imposed upon him without fail according to what the owner of the woman may lay upon him; and he must give it through the justices.
23 But if a fatal accident should occur, then you must give soul for soul, 
24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
25 branding for branding, wound for wound, blow for blow (Exodus 21).

But God has a non human soul himself...

18 Look! My servant whom I chose, my beloved, whom my soul approved! I will put my spirit upon him, and what justice is he will make clear to the nations (Matthew 12).

1 Look! My servant, on whom I keep fast hold! My chosen one, [whom] my soul has approved! I have put my spirit in him. Justice to the nations is what he will bring forth (Isaiah 42).

So God has a spiritual soul, so a soul can be a spiritual body too. If you put all of this together we see that

Definition: A Body is a physical or spiritual vessel. In other words a human or angelic body.

Definition: A Soul, by which is meant a living soul, is one spirit, inside a self sustaining living physical or spiritual body.

Definition: A Dead Soul is a dead body

Definition: A Spirit is a person, a character, a personality. It is 'you'.

2 All the ways of a man are pure in his own eyes, but Jehovah is making an estimate of spirits (Proverbs 16).

Your spirit is neither human nor angelic. It is your character and is in the image of God, who is a spirit.

24 God is a Spirit, and those worshiping him must worship with spirit and truth (John 4).

The Hebrew word for Soul is Nephesh [#pn]. The root meaning is to breath or respire (BDAHCL). So a soul is literally a breather, a living human body. In fact Nephesh can mean life or spirit as well. The Hebrew word for spirit is Ruach. Of course if a soul is said to be dead, then it is a dead body. But it is living 'breathing' unless otherwise stated. The human act of breathing is the physicalisation of an equivalent angelic act. There is an angelic 'air'. To see what this might be let us consider a fascinating scripture...

1 Furthermore, [it is] you [God made alive] though you were dead in your trespasses and sins,
2 in which you at one time walked according to the system of things of this world, according to the ruler of the authority of
the air, the spirit [Satan, the ruler, is a spirit] that now operates in the sons of disobedience (Ephesians 2).

So bad 'air' is the spiritual atmosphere, the authority of the air is the governments and ruling groups of this world, the ruler of the authority of the air, is actually Satan. He sets the overall scene in which we live. The angels on the other hand live under God's air in the heavens. They must take in the various influences from their atmosphere and exhale these influences, passing them on to other angels. Humans stay alive by breathing each other's air continually. We share the most important thing in our lives without question, whilst fighting over the least important things. The angels' very spiritual life depends upon their imbibing, digesting and regurgitating spiritual influences from their environment. So if an angel leaves the good atmosphere of God's administration in heaven in favour of Satan's breakaway group, he will suffocate very quickly. (So meeting the Lord in the air is meeting Jesus in the real oxygen, the real life sustaining environment, God's administration in heaven).

So now we can understand what Jesus meant when he said... 

28 And do not become fearful of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; but rather be in fear of him that can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna (Matthew 10).

It means this:

28 And do not become fearful of those who kill the [physical] body but cannot kill the [angelic] soul. But rather be in fear of him that can destroy [but not kill] both [angelic] soul and [physical] body in Gehenna (Matthew 10).

The 'soul' here means the angelic soul, which is the angelic body plus the spirit in combination, and 'body' means physical body, the human body. Men can kill the human body, but they cannot touch an angelic soul. God can destroy the human body and he can destroy the angelic soul, which is the angelic body and spirit in combination. He destroys the angelic sole by removing the spirit. But God cannot actually 'kill' any soul. He cannot kill any body together with its spirit, because he is prevented by everlasting love for all of his sons. For nowhere in the bible, neither in Matthew 10 nor anywhere else, do we read the God will kill your spirit. As regards the spirit, we read...

12 For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern thoughts and intentions of [the] heart (Hebrews 4).

So the soul and the spirit are two different things and the difference between them is explained in the bible.

4 His spirit goes out, he goes back to his ground. In that day his thoughts do perish (Psalms 146).

14 How much more will the blood of the Christ, who through an everlasting spirit offered himself without blemish to God, cleanse our consciences from dead works that we may render sacred service to [the] living God? (Hebrews 9).

Nowhere in the bible is a spirit said to die. The everlasting spirit of Jesus Christ was him. Jesus' spirit is his character, his personality. Jesus said of his father...

24 God is a Spirit, and those worshiping him must worship with spirit and truth (John 4).

11 For who among men knows the things of a man except the spirit of man that is in him? So, too, no one has come to know the things of God, except the spirit of God (1 Corinthians 2).

By experience, we know that no man can read the mind or heart of another with any great accuracy. Paul is saying this. But by qualifying this blindness with the phrase' among men', he is also saying that the angels can read both our hearts and our minds. We must be some education to them! So the spirit of Jesus is his character, and our spirit, our character, is inside us and even God himself is a spirit, having a character like his sons, and especially like his firstborn son.

The soul is therefore the life carrying vehicle. Now the life, your life, you, is the spirit. We are spirits, our characters are spirits. The soul (human or angelic) is the vehicle for the spirit.

The spirit is your character, it is 'you'. Things get confusing when one realises that an angelic body is a spirit body and an angel is a spirit creature, sometimes referred to as a 'spirit'. But to spell things out unequivocally:

All living creatures are souls which are spirits within bodies.
A living human is a spirit within a physical body
A living angel is a spirit within a spiritual body.

Spirit + Body = Soul (human)
Spirit + Body = Soul (angelic)

10 But Paul went downstairs, threw himself upon him and embraced him and said: Stop raising a clamor, for his soul is in him (Acts 20).

Paul is saying that his spirit and his physical body is in 'him'. In other words his body is alive and his spirit is in it. It would have been far simpler for Paul to say: his spirit is in him. But his body being 'in him' just means he is physically alive.

1 A pronouncement: The word of Jehovah concerning Israel, is the utterance of Jehovah, the One who is stretching out [the] heavens and laying the foundation of [the] earth and forming the spirit of man inside him (Zechariah 12).

For when Jesus resurrected Jarius' daughter, her spirit returned to her...

53 At this they began to laugh at him scornfully, because they knew she had died.
54 But he took her by the hand and called, saying: "Girl, get up!"
55 And her spirit returned, and she rose instantly, and he ordered something to be given her to eat (Luke 8).

So a body without a spirit is a car without a driver. It is just a dead vehicle. The driver is the spirit, the car is the body and the car with a driver is the soul. The whole deal is summed up in Genesis 2 where Moses says...

7 And Jehovah God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground [he made the body] and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life [he put a spirit in the body], and the man came to be a living soul [body + spirit = soul] (Genesis 2).

[10]  Why do we die?

Adam's sons and daughters are born condemned to death under the death penalty passed and eventually executed on Adam by God. If you do not believe that Adam and Eve were real, the death penalty that all mankind still suffers is certainly real enough. Even today scientists do not understand why a body which has the capability to fix itself, grows old and kills itself. Where is the evolutionary advantage in that? Like any other human, Adam could only pass on to his sons the life that he had, he could not pass on everlasting life to them, because he himself only had a finite life once he began to have children after he was thrown out of the garden. One cannot clean anything with dirty water. Likewise a priest cannot pass on to his congregation a cleanliness that he does not himself possess. 

When Adam sinned (on 3993Nisan14 BC) by eating the fruit of the tree and breaking the one and only law upon him he was sentenced to death by God. But he did not physically die until 3097 BC, some 896 years later. During this time Adam and Eve had many children, both sons and daughters, and these interbred to form the very long lived pre-flood patriarchs of Genesis 5. Here is a list of their lengths of life as specified in Genesis 5...

The pre-adamic humans were living for the same sort of lifespan that we have today presumably, and the sons and daughters of Adam would have been forbidden from marrying pre-adamic partners before the flood, just as the Jews were forbidden to marry the Gentiles under the Law of Moses. Certainly those in the table above did not interbreed, since they all lived to a very ripe old age! The way that God executed the physical death penalty on Adam and on Eve and hence on all mankind is that he changed their genes from indefinitely lasting to finitely lasting. Adam and Eve did not age physically in the Garden of Eden, which paradise was a prophecy for the kingdom of God which is soon to come. The bible describes our parents loss of non ageing bodies as follows...

22 And Jehovah God went on to say: Here the man has become like one of us in knowing good and bad, and now in order that he may not put his hand out and actually take [fruit] also from the tree of life and eat and live to time indefinite [I will have to act].
23 With that Jehovah God put him out of the garden of Eden to cultivate the ground from which he had been taken (Genesis 3).

So if the pair had remained in the garden, eating from the tree of life, then they would not have died. So their bodies cannot have been ageing in the garden. So God changed their genes to the slowly dying variety that we all know today at the time of their sin. 

We are told that God made them some long garments of skin to wear as they left the garden. He did this physically because they only realised that they were naked after they had discovered sexual desire. And Adam only discovered sexual desire when Eve used it on him to get him to eat the fruit. It is not easy to see this from Genesis 3 (although it is possible), we know this happened because the whole story is an archetype for the way Satan uses women to get to men today. He tempts women into sin using their desire for status, and they tempt men into sin using man's desire for sex. And Eve only discovered sexual desire when Satan introduced her to it through the mouthpiece of the snake in the tree. He abused her desire for status to get what he wanted. He wanted to get Adam to sin, in order that he could terminate God's plan to use humans to condemn his heavenly activities, which we physicalise. He wished to avoid being exposed in front of his peers. So he sold knowledge of bad to Eve by telling her that if she ate from the tree she would be like God (having a vastly increased status) knowing good and bad.

4 At this the serpent said to the woman: You positively will not die.
5 For God knows that in the very day of your eating from it your eyes are bound to be opened and you are bound to be like God, knowing good and bad (Genesis 3).

Whereas God had said...

17 But as for the tree of the knowledge of good and bad you must not eat from it, for in the day you eat from it you will positively die (Genesis 2).

Satan lied to Eve in verse 4, but told her the truth in verse 5. Eve was seduced by her desire for Status, but her experience taught her how to seduce Adam with his desire for her. So Satan must have told Eve about the birds and the bees after he seduced her into sin. The scripture says that both of their eyes were opened after they both had eaten, which appears to indicate that both of their eyes were opened at the same time, which means it was not the actual eating (by Eve) that opened her eyes but it was the experience of sexual desire in the case of understanding nakedness and it was the experience of their consciences beating them in the case of understanding sin and therefore knowing bad that woke her up. They both already knew good of course. Eve did not realise what she had done was bad until Adam explained it to her, she was thoroughly deceived. Her conscience only started beating her once Adam's started beating him, which presumably caused him to have a go at her.

14 Also, Adam was not deceived, but the woman was thoroughly deceived and came to be in transgression (1 Timothy 2).

Presumably Eve had just reached puberty when she was introduced to Adam and so had no concept of sexual desire. Adam had been in the garden since he was 11 - see I6. So he had no concept of sexual desire either. We can deduce that both Adam and Eve grew up around twice as slowly as we do today, since they had a much longer life span and none of the pre flood patriarchs of Genesis 5 or the post flood patriarchs of Genesis 11 had any children under the age of 29, whereas today boys reach puberty at around 12-14 years old. So in modern terms Adam had the body of a 16¾ year old when he sinned aged 33 years old and became sexually aware - see I6. Eve was presumably slightly younger. Once they realised that they were naked we read...

21 And Jehovah God proceeded to make long garments of skin for Adam and for his wife and to clothe them (Genesis 3).

The literal meaning of this is that God made them some clothes to wear from animal skins. But the concept of clothing our original parents is repeated. The true bible code, which is a symbolic code, tells us that successively repeated concepts have greater meanings. The greater meaning is that God gave the pair of them new 900 odd year long ageing bodies (very long garments of skin).

These then are the garments of skin that we wear today (in a shorter variety). The death penalty that God passed on our parents exists and is enforced entirely by our genes, our bodies. We die due to ageing bodies, quite obviously, and we inherit these from Adam and Eve. The sinner and the saint, the murderer and the doctor die, not from whatever sins they may have committed during their lives, but actually from the death penalty executed upon our parents genes, which genes we all inherit.

[11]  The Holy Spirit is God's Wife!

The holy spirit is described by John as the helper:

26 But the helper, the holy spirit, which the Father will send in my name, that one will teach you all things and bring back to your minds all the things I told you (John 14).

But Adam's wife was described in the same way:

18 And Jehovah God went on to say: It is not good for the man to continue by himself. I am going to make a helper for him, as a complement of him (Genesis 2).

This is not a coincidence. Just as Eve was a complement and helper to Adam so the holy spirit is God's helper, and a complement to him. It is his wife. It is Jesus' mum. The 3, God, The Holy Spirit and Jesus, are a family. They are Father Mother and Son, for Jesus did not come from a single parent family as all churches would have you believe.

Another way to see that God has a wife is to consider the Jesus' words when he said...

19 Therefore, in answer, Jesus went on to say to them: Most truly I say to you, The Son cannot do a single thing of his own initiative, but only what he beholds the Father doing. For whatever things that One does, these things the Son also does in like manner (John 5).

So Jesus only does what he has seen his father do first. But the whole of Jesus' ministry can be regarded as a journey to a distant land to get himself a large composite wife, which wife he paid for with his blood. And certainly Jesus suceeded and got a wife - see U65. So John 5:19 is basically saying that God is married, which is hardly surprising. 

It is telling us that God himself must also have got himself a wife in a similar manner to Jesus. Jesus proposed to the 1NC saints at the last supper and ended up marrying 144,000 of them who now make up his composite wife, his heavenly home. 

1 And I saw, and, look! the Lamb standing upon the Mount Zion, and with him 144,000 having his name and the name of his Father written on their foreheads.
2 And I heard a sound out of heaven as the sound of many waters and as the sound of loud thunder; and the sound that I heard was as of singers who accompany themselves on the harp playing on their harps.
3 And they are singing as if a new song before the throne and before the 4 living creatures and the elders; and no one was able to master that song but the 144,000, who have been bought from the earth.
4 These are the ones that did not defile themselves with women; in fact, they are virgins. These are the ones that keep following the Lamb no matter where he goes. These were bought from among mankind as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb,
5 and no falsehood was found in their mouths; they are without blemish (Revelation 14).

8 Yes, it has been granted to her to be arrayed in bright, clean, fine linen, for the fine linen stands for the righteous acts of the holy ones.
9 And he tells me: Write: Happy are those invited to the evening meal of the Lamb's marriage. Also, he tells me: These are the true sayings of God (Revelation 19).

In fact God's wife is likewise 144,000 holy angels who as a group make up the holy spirit, the house of God, his church.

The holy spirit is not mentioned much in the old testament, but here are all the explicit references to it as 'the holy spirit'...

11 Do not throw me away from before your face; And your holy spirit O do not take away from me (Psalm 51).

10 But they themselves rebelled and made his holy spirit feel hurt. He now was changed into an enemy of theirs; he himself warred against them (Isaiah 63).
11 And one began to remember the days of long ago, Moses his servant: Where is the One that brought them up out of the sea with the shepherds of his flock? Where is the One that put within him His own holy spirit? (Isaiah 63).

But it is referred to more in other ways...

9 And Joshua the son of Nun was full of the spirit of wisdom, for Moses had laid his hand upon him; and the sons of Israel began to listen to him and they went doing just as Jehovah had commanded Moses (Deuteronomy 34).

17 the spirit of the truth, which the world cannot receive, because it neither beholds it nor knows it. You know it, because it remains with you and is in you (John 14) [this is a new testament reference, both wisdom and truth are fruitages of the holy spirit].

31 And he proceeded to fill him with the spirit of God in wisdom, in understanding and in knowledge and in every sort of craftsmanship (Exodus 35).

Since the holy spirit imparts wisdom it must be an intelligent being or beings. Likewise we can deduce that the holy spirit is a living intelligent thing because it can plead for us:

26 In like manner the spirit also joins in with help for our weakness; for the [problem of] what we should pray for as we need to we do not know, but the spirit itself pleads/intercedes for us with groanings unuttered (Romans 8).

Furthermore it gets hurt and grieves...

30 Also, do not be grieving God's holy spirit, with which you have been sealed for a day of releasing by ransom (Ephesians 4).

And it has a will of its own...

11 But all these operations the one and the same spirit performs, making a distribution to each one respectively just as it wills (1 Corinthians 12).

So since it is a living spirit, so it must consist either of an angel or of a group of them. We know that there is more than one holy angel...

4 Making his angels [his messengers] spirits, his ministers a devouring fire (Psalm 104).

13 But with reference to which one of the angels has he ever said: Sit at my right hand, until I place your enemies as a stool for your feet?
14 Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth on behalf of those who are going to inherit salvation? (Hebrews 1).

The holy spirit does God's ministering and contains ministers, who are holy spirits plural. So the holy spirit is a group of angels. But why would any holy angel be excluded? So it must be the group of all the angels who are holy, all the angels who are married to God, all the angels who are in a covenant with God. Hence Paul said:

26 But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother (Galatians 4).

The Jerusalem above is God's heavenly administration which is all of the loyal angels, which is all of the holy spirits. Paul explicitly states that these angels are our Mother, for they give birth to all the new angels. Now mother's plead with father's not to be too hard on errant sons. And that is precisely the meaning of Romans 8:26, the holy spirit interceding with God for the sanctified ones, is the mother interceding with the father for her sons. 

God does refer to a whole nation of people as one person...

22 And you must say to Pharaoh: This is what Jehovah has said: Israel is my son, my firstborn (Exodus 4).

He also refers to the entire church as Jesus' wife, one person in the singular...

22 Let wives be in subjection to their husbands as to the Lord,
23 because a husband is head of his wife as the Christ also is head of the congregation, he being a savior of [that] body.
24 In fact, as the congregation is in subjection to the Christ, so let wives also be to their husbands in everything (Ephesians 5).

So the whole congregation is regarded as being one body, one wife. The account of Philip baptizing the ethiopian eunuch gives the secret away entirely when read with the eyes open.

26 However, Jehovah's angel spoke to Philip, saying: Rise and go to the south to the road that runs down from Jerusalem to Gaza. This is a desert road.
27 With that he rose and went, and, look! an Ethiopian eunuch, a man in power under Candace queen of the Ethiopians, and who was over all her treasure. He had gone to Jerusalem to worship,
28 but he was returning and was sitting in his chariot and reading aloud the prophet Isaiah.
29 So the spirit said to Philip: Approach and join yourself to this chariot.
30 Philip ran alongside and heard him reading aloud Isaiah the prophet, and he said: Do you actually know what you are reading?
31 He said: Really, how could I ever do so, unless someone guided me? And he entreated Philip to get on and sit down with him.
32 Now the passage of Scripture that he was reading aloud was this: As a sheep he was brought to the slaughter, and as a lamb that is voiceless before its shearer, so he does not open his mouth.
33 During his humiliation the judgment was taken away from him. Who will tell the details of his generation? Because his life is taken away from the earth.
34 In answer the eunuch said to Philip: I beg you, About whom does the prophet say this? About himself or about some other man?
35 Philip opened his mouth and, starting with this Scripture, he declared to him the good news about Jesus.
36 Now as they were going over the road, they came to a certain body of water, and the eunuch said: Look! A body of water; what prevents me from getting baptized?
37 --
38 With that he commanded the chariot to halt, and they both went down into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.
39 When they had come up out of the water, Jehovah's spirit quickly led Philip away, and the eunuch did not see him anymore, for he kept going on his way rejoicing (Acts 8).

So Jehovah's angel was the speaking as 'the spirit' which was 'Jehovahs spirit'. This shows that God's spirit consists of angels. In fact the angel who spoke to Philip would have probably been his opposite number in the holy spirit. For there is a one to one correspondence between the 144,000 angels of the holy spirit, God's wife, and the 144,000 angels of Jesus' wife, the 1NC saints. 

So now we can understand the sentiments of Paul when he said...

19 Do not admit an accusation against an older man, except only on the evidence of 2 or 3 witnesses.
20 Reprove before all onlookers persons who practice sin, that the rest also may have fear.
21 I solemnly charge you before God and Christ Jesus and the chosen angels [the 144,000 angels chosen by God to be actually his second wife, the holy spirit, the 3rd witness] to keep these things without prejudgment, doing nothing according to a biased leaning (1 Timothy 5).

God must have married his second wife and celebrated with the week long feast after Jesus ascended on 33Iyyar25 and before the holy spirit was poured out and the 12 apostles of that spirit sat upon the heads of the 12 apostles of the 1NC at Pentecost 33. So there are in fact 3 divine witness bearers in heaven, the father, the son (who became a God at his resurrection) and the holy spirit, the step mother of Jesus and the mother of the 1NC saints, the second wife of God. So this puts the canonicity of the extra phrase in 1John5:7-8 in a new context! We believe, that Jesus gave his firstborn angelic rights, which he had purchased from Satan, to Gabriel who then became the head of the second holy spirit just as Satan was the head of the first holy spirit. For we know that Jesus then became the first created God, the firstborn God, the only begotten God who is in the bosom with the father (John 1:18). Jesus cannot both be a God to be worshipped with his own wife, the 1NC saints, the holy spirit of the kingdom, and the head of the holy spirit of God. 

26 In her 6th month the angel Gabriel was sent forth from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth,
27 to a virgin promised in marriage to a man named Joseph of David's house; and the name of the virgin was Mary.
28 And when he went in before her he said: Good day, highly favored one, Jehovah is with you.
29 But she was deeply disturbed at the saying and began to reason out what sort of greeting this might be.
30 So the angel said to her: Have no fear, Mary, for you have found favor with God;
31 and, look! you will conceive in your womb and give birth to a son, and you are to call his name Jesus.
32 This one will be great and will be called Son of the Most High; and Jehovah God will give him the throne of David his father,
33 and he will rule as king over the house of Jacob forever, and there will be no end of his kingdom (Luke 1)

God sent his heavenly wife, the true mother of Jesus, the second holy spirit, to tell Mary, the surrogate mother of Jesus, about her giving birth to his son, by his heavenly wife. Gabriel made the announcement, so he was the head of God's wife, the mediator of the second holy spirit. He was promised in marriage to God but not actually married, just as Mary was promised in marriage to Joseph but not actually married! Gabriel conceived through the conception of Mary. 

God is not a hypocrite

The concept that God commanded his sons to get married and to be punished with the death penalty if they had children out of wedlock but himself created the entire human race and all the angels as a single parent is absurd and insulting to the one whose activities are perfect as it makes him into a hypocrite of species wide proportion.

Technical Note

This may be why Jesus said to Peter...

52 Then Jesus said to him: Return your sword to its place, for all those who take the sword will perish by the sword.
53 Or do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father to supply me at this moment more than 12 legions of angels? [72,000 angels]
54 In that case, how would the Scriptures be fulfilled that it must take place this way? (Matthew 26).

These angels of the holy spirit being in one to one correspondence with the 72,000/80,000 1NC saints of the first presence. 

Husbands and Wives

Here is a table of greater or lesser husbands and wives...

The very word 'corporation', or 'incorporated' means a lot of people regarded as one body. 

Now the Holy Spirit is the Mother of everyone living spiritually whereas Adam called his wife Eve because:

20 After this Adam called his wife's name Eve, because she had to become the mother of everyone living (Genesis 3).

So God does have a family, and in this family he is the father, the holy spirit is the mother, God's wife, and Jesus is now the firstborn son. So there it is. There is nothing mystical or indecipherable about it, we are just talking about your regular family (well OK they are a rather powerful example!). This is why you cannot blaspheme against God or against his wife, who wears his name but you could blaspheme against Jesus, before he was resurrected...

31 On this account I say to you: Every sort of sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the spirit will not be forgiven.
32 For example, whoever speaks a word [in blasphemy] against the Son of man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever speaks [in blasphemy] against the holy spirit, it will not be forgiven him, no, not in this system of things nor in that to come (Matthew 12).

So the holy spirit has the same status as God, being his wife, so it cannot just be one angel, for if it was, then that angel would also be a God to be worshipped with the same status as Jehovah. 

Incidentally the holy spirit, or helper or comforter, the spirit of the truth, the spirit of wisdom, sent by God, is always referred to in the neuter in scripture. However, the spirit of truth, sent by Jesus, which is also called a helper is referred to in the masculine...

26 When the helper arrives that I will send you from the Father, the spirit of the truth, which proceeds from the Father, that one will bear witness about me (John 15).

7 Nevertheless, I am telling you the truth. It is for your benefit I am going away. For if I do not go away, the helper will by no means come to you, but if I do go my way, I will send him to you (John 16).

13 However, when that one arrives, the spirit of the truth, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak of his own impulse, but what things he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things coming (John 16).

This 'spirit of the truth', the one sent by Jesus, as opposed to the one sent by Jehovah, is the angel of Revelation that presented Revelation in signs to John...

1 A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. And he sent forth his angel and presented [it] in signs through him to his slave John (Revelation 1).

So all of the holy angels together, as the holy spirit, are feminine. But each individual angel is masculine.

13 But with reference to which one of the angels has he ever said: Sit at my right hand, until I place your enemies as a stool for your feet?
14 Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth [as the holy spirit] on behalf of those who are going to inherit salvation? (Hebrews 1).

The holy spirit itself is the helper, the ministering spirit for all of us, and so are these angels. So the one is the sum of the others.

First Century Christian Writings

The Saviour himself said: Just now my mother, the Holy Spirit, took me by one of my hairs [an angel loyal to Jesus' promised headship of the holy spirit that came after his sacrifice] and carried me up to the great mountain, Tabor (Gospel of the Hebrews).

So the Holy Spirit is Jesus’ mum.

[12]  How is one born again without dying?

Nicodemus, a faithful and courageous Pharisee, came to visit Jesus one night. He put his faith in the son of God and here is some of the conversation that resulted... 

3 In answer Jesus said to him: Most truly I say to you, Unless anyone is born again [literally generated from above], he cannot see the kingdom of God.
4 Nicodemus said to him: How can a man be born when he is old? He cannot enter into the womb of his mother a second time and be born, can he?
5 Jesus answered: Most truly I say to you, unless anyone is born from water and spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
6 What has been born from the flesh is flesh, and what has been born from the spirit is spirit.
7 Do not marvel because I told you, you people must be born again (John 3).

8 I baptized you with water, but he will baptize you with holy spirit (Mark 1).

Being born from water is a water baptism. Being from spirit is a spirit baptism, a baptism in holy spirit, which is being born again.  A water baptism does not immediately give you a new physical body, since you are stuck with the one you have until you die. But it leads to a rebirth in the flesh, when one enters the Kingdom of God as a human, in a new body. Whereas referring to the spirit birth, being 'born from the spirit', Nicodemus asks how this can possibly happen? But his very question is the answer...

4 Nicodemus said to him: How can a man be born again when he is old? He cannot enter into the womb of his mother a second time and be born can he? (John 3)

Well literally, no, of course he cannot. But symbolically, yes, that is precisely how one is born again. We are born again from the womb of our heavenly mother, God’s wife, the holy spirit. Born as an angel. The spirit woman, gives birth to angels. When you are born again, God creates an angel in heaven through his wife, the holy spirit, for your spirit to inhabit in the future, Amen. For we are the little brothers of the angels. The spirit birth can happen immediately on baptism in holy spirit since we have no spiritual body prior to such a baptism. 

When Adam was created the scripture says...

7 And Jehovah God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man came to be a living soul (Genesis 2).

The breath of life was not from the ground, it was from the heaven. God blew into two nostrils, two vessels for the breathy of life, two vessels for your life. The vessel of dust, the human body, and the vessel of spirit, the angel. Adam was born again although not actually when he was born, but when he reached 30 years old (we deduce this from his correspondence with the life of Jesus - U41). It took 30 years for God to finish blowing into his nostrils! In fact in all humans, our two nostrils and our two lungs are declaring the two vehicles for the spirit of life which we can possess. All those who are born again whilst alive as humans have both vehicles, after the second birth. Although of course the latter is invisible and undetectable. Hence we read in the next verse of John 3...

8 The wind blows where it wants to, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know where it comes from and where it is going. So is everyone that has been born from the spirit (John 3).

The born again have their own empty angel upstairs with their name on it. So they are truly spirit sons of God.

17 Consequently if anyone is in union with Christ, he is a new creation. The old things have passed away. Look! new things [new earthly body at earthly resurrection and new heavenly body at baptism] have come into existence (2 Corinthians 5).

[13]  What is physical death?

Solomon tells us that the dead are conscious of nothing and David tells us that their thoughts have perished... 

5 For the living are conscious that they will die; but as for the dead, they are conscious of nothing at all, neither do they anymore have wages, because the remembrance of them has been forgotten (Ecclesiastes 9).

3 Do not put your trust in nobles, nor in the son of earthling man, to whom no salvation belongs. 
4 His spirit goes out, he goes back to the ground, in that day his thoughts do perish (Psalm 146).

So the dead are not conscious and their thoughts perish. At first thought, as a human, one thinks that this means the dead have their brains switched off, so they do not think at all. One thinks that their thoughts perish on the day that they die. But the bible is not written like that. Their thoughts perish on the entire 'day' of their being dead in the correct interpretation. Because we should interpret this scripture in the same way as we interpret the scripture...

17 But as for the tree of the knowledge of good and bad you must not eat from it, for in the day you eat from it you will positively
die (Genesis 2).

Now Eve did not die judicially on the literal day she ate the fruit although Adam did. But both died during the 1,000 year first day of the 7,000 year week during which we all eat from that tree and die. Likewise the thoughts of those in the first death, physical death, perish all through the 'day' of their being dead, however long that 'day' may be. So the physically dead do think, actually in their dreams, but those thoughts are subconscious and they perish as do all unremembered dreams.

Two of the people that Jesus resurrected during his ministry, Jarius's daughter and Lazarus, he himself described not as being dead, but as being asleep. 

39 And, after stepping in, he said to them: Why are you causing noisy confusion and weeping? The young child has not died, but is sleeping.
40 At this they began to laugh scornfully at him. But, having put them all out, he took along the young child's father and mother and those with him, and he went in where the young child was.
41 And, taking the hand of the young child, he said to her: Talitha cumi, which, translated, means: Maiden, I say to you, Get up!
42 And immediately the maiden rose and began walking, for she was 12 years old. And at once they were beside themselves with great ecstasy (Mark 5).

11 He said these things, and after this he said to them: Lazarus our friend has gone to rest, but I am journeying there to awaken him from sleep.
12 Therefore the disciples said to him: Lord, if he has gone to rest, he will get well.
13 Jesus had spoken, however, about his death. But they imagined he was speaking about taking rest in sleep.
14 At that time, therefore, Jesus said to them outspokenly: Lazarus has died (John 11).

When Jesus said that these people were asleep, even though of course they were not in fact physically asleep but were dead. Jesus was not lying because Peter tells us that Jesus neither lied nor sinned...

21 In fact, to this [course] you were called, because even Christ suffered for you leaving you a model for you to follow his steps closely.
22 He committed no sin, nor was deception found in his mouth (1 Peter 2).

So Jarius's daughter and Lazarus were indeed both physically dead, but they were also 'asleep' and therefore 'not dead' in some other sense. When the Christian Martyr Stephen was stoned in Acts 7 the bible says...

60 Then bending his knees, he cried out with a strong voice: Lord - do not charge this sin against them. And after saying this he fell asleep (Acts 7)!

This wasn't because Stephen was getting so bored with being stoned that he decided to take a power nap as the Sanhedrin was pelting him with rocks! Stephen truly fell asleep when he died. But what actually falls asleep in death? It is not the human body. But there is only one other vehicle for the human spirit and that is an angelic body. A dead person is almost precisely like a person under a general anesthetic except that a dead person cannot remain in his human body which is destroyed. So his or her spirit must be asleep in an angelic body. There is no other option.

Looking at this from our own experience, when one has an anesthetic one wakes up from a dream and one remembers the very end of the dream (especially if the nurse is talking to you and asking you what you are doing in your dream, which has happenned to the writer). So even under a general anesthetic one continues to dream. Of course during sleep we all dream and we only remember dreams when we wake up during them for some reason. Jesus is telling us that sleep prefigures death so we would expect to dream during death. But since our thoughts perish, these dream of course will not be remembered since one is never woken up whilst one is physically dead, at least not until one is resurrected.

Philosophy

At last we have solved the great puzzle of faith in God's capability to carry us through death that Gordon had been wrestling with for 15 years. How do I know that a resurrected me is actually me? We knew that something had to keep going, there needed to be a continuity of some type for if I stop then I can be cloned and that clone would be identical to me but would not be me. But what is it that keeps going, what is it that defines my life? What is the heartbeat of the brain or the spirit.

Well the answer is that when your spirit leaves your physical body and stops experiencing physical reality, then it starts experiencing virtual reality instead, in your dreams. You continue to exist in your dreams just as you existed in the physical construct of the universe. To the mind, nothing much has changed. Your spirit lives by continuing to make decisions in the virutal reality of your dreams. These dreams do not occur in the human brain any longer, but in the angelic brain, where your spirit resides during the first death. The angelic brain is a superior cognitive mechanism to the human brain of course. Presumably your dreams are in higher resolution! 

So death really could be described as an improved dream.

Definition: A living spirit never stops making decisions in some kind of environment (physical reality, angelic reality or virtual dream reality). 

So free willed life is a continuous decision making process. Plant life is something else. Although we do not own our bodies we merely lease them, we all of us have the freehold deeds to our everlasting spirits.

Definition: A spirit in the first death dreams and does not remember its dreams other than perhaps the last one at the moment it is resurrected.

So the first death is truly angelic sleep which to us will be indistinguishable from human sleep or a general anesthetic. So there is absolutely no need at all to be scared of death. - unless one is bound for Gehenna upon resurrection.

Solomon refers to this as follows...

5 Because [a] man is walking to his long lasting house and the wailers have marched around in the street.
6 before the silver chord is removed and the golden bowl gets crushed and the jar at the spring is broken and the waterwheel for the cistern has been crushed.
7 Then the dust returns to the earth just as it happened to be and the spirit itself returns to the [true] God who gave it (Ecclesiastes 12).

Obviously Solomon is using metaphor here. He is talking symbolically. The man of Ecclesiastes 12:5 has died. His long lasting house that he is walking to is his angelic body, the wailers are the funeral attenders. The human body is mainly plumbing for blood which represents our spirit our life. We are walking fluid dynamics. And Solomon is explaining our physiology in these terms. The Golden bowl is his head, the jar at the bubbling spring is presumably the circulatory system for the lungs which are the spring. The waterwheel is the heart and the cistern is the circulatory system for the body. The silver chord is an umbilical connection to a mother. This mother is the holy spirit, the heavenly woman, God's wife. When the umbilical cord is cut then the baby is born. This baby is the long lasting house, the angelic body. Gold means first (in time here) and silver means second (in time). Gold has a higher financial value than silver, and is used symbolically to represent a higher temporal value. So the golden bowl of the human vessel exists before the silver cord of the angelic vessel. So the human body precedes the angelic one for mankind.

But the silver angelic umbilical chord is cut and the angelic body is born before the golden bowl is crushed and the human body fails. This enable the spirit of the man to go into the angelic vehicle before it loses its human vehicle.

Putting this another way the man or woman is born again as an angel in an angelic body before he or she dies as a human in a human body. So everyone is born again when they die if they have not been born again whilst they were alive. But no one realises this at the time since they are unconscious. However out of body experiences in near death situations are widely reported.

44 It is sown a physical, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a physical body, there is also a spiritual one (1 Corinthians 15). 

Well that is very good news, especially if one's physical body is a bit knackered! So we all get a spiritual body eventually. Those who are born again whilst they are living, and maintain their faith under test, get a permanent angelic vehicle of their own before they die. The rest of us get to borrow one when we die until we are resurrected into another human vehicle of our own. 

Being born again due to faith, becoming God's son, means having an empty angel waiting, with your name on it as your possession so long as you pass the test. If you die without being born again then you are put into a temporary angel with no name on it, and then later resurrected back to a plain old human with no associated angel. But all human resurrections require an angelic stage to bridge the gap between the two human bodies. This is why Paul says 'it is raised a spiritual body'.

Historical Note:

Tony and Gordon, two of the first Lords' Witnesses, first realised that spirits of humans enter temporary angels when they die, when they considered the following situation: Let us suppose that Gordon died, and that as the Jehovah’s Witnesses then believed, his character was stored in God’s memory. If God resurrected him by sticking his exact character back into another human body, then would he still be Gordon? Or would he merely be a perfect copy from a character standpoint of Gordon? A clone of Gordon.

If he was merely a clone, then Gordon himself would actually still be dead, and would have not benefited at all from his own resurrection. Although no one would actually know whether the clone was Gordon or not, since the clone would be a perfect copy. In order for Gordon's resurrection to be of some use to him, there needs to be a continuity of his life between his first human body and his second human or angelic body. This continuity can only be provided angelically because God possesses no other souls for the human spirit, other than the human soul and the angelic soul.

The point is that God's memory would return an exact copy of what it stored (we argued), but the returned character would not have been asleep in an angel and therefore would have had no continuity of its own individual life. And therefore would not be the person that entered God's memory. God's memory would return a perfect copy of what was put into it. But it would not be the same person without a continuity of life. Sleep is that continuity and one sleeps in one's own body, not in God's memory.

[14]  What the Hell is Gehenna?

Gehenna is the Hebrew word for Hell. Mankind's attempts to understand the nature of Hell are classic examples of how imperfect and incomplete our thought processes are as a race and as individuals. To set the scene we have the Catholic church filling the western world with guilt and fear for 1900 years, by telling us that we would physically fry in hell if we did not join up with them and pay lots of money to the Pope. The majority of our dear brothers and sisters in faith believed this and joined up. Today the Catholic church is physically the world's most successful Christian church with around 900 million members worldwide. The Catholics have given us a Hell of eternal torment, eternal punishment, eternal burning and eternal physical pain. They came to this conclusion from scriptures such as Jesus' parable of the Rich man and Lazarus:

24 So he called and said, 'Father Abraham, have mercy on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in anguish in this blazing fire.'
25 But Abraham said, 'Child, remember that you received in full your good things in your lifetime, but Lazarus correspondingly the injurious things. Now, however, he is having comfort here but you are in anguish.
26 And besides all these things, a great chasm has been fixed between us and you people, so that those wanting to go over from here to you people cannot, neither may people cross over from there to us (Luke 16).

43 And if ever your hand makes you stumble, cut it off; it is finer for you to enter into life maimed than with two hands to go off into Gehenna, into the fire that cannot be put out (Mark 9).

We have not researched the precise road that Catholic thinking took, but plainly if one is thrown into a fire that cannot be put out and if one is separated from others by a chasm that one cannot cross, then things are not looking good.

But the thing about being a Christian and about knowing and loving God is this... It is more than an academic understanding of scripture. It is the academic understanding of a book written by the very definition of love. So the book must always reflect God's love. So one Charles Taze Russell, called the man who put the fires out in hell by the US press, the founder of the Watchtower, knowing his father, asked the following type of question:

Would it be fair or just or loving to punish a man into eternity for sins which he committed over a period of a mere 70 years? The conclusion that the founder of the International Bible Students, now known as the Jehovah's Witnesses, came to was this:

A God that would use his power to create human beings, whom he foreknew and pre-destinated should be eternally tormented, could be neither wise, just nor loving. His standard would be lower than that of many men (Kingdom Proclaimers book).

This type of reasoning is the triumph of love over dogma, it is the triumph of wisdom over doctrine. For at first sight the scriptures do appear to support an eternal torturing of the unrighteous, yet Jehovah is the one who makes it rain on the righteous and the unrighteous alike whilst they are alive, and his son advised us to...

44 However, I say to you: Continue to love your enemies and to pray for those persecuting you;
45 that you may prove yourselves sons of your Father who is in the heavens, since he makes his sun rise upon wicked people and good and makes it rain upon righteous people and unrighteous (Matthew 5).

When a warm and gentle breeze blows across a Mediterranean beach on a summer evening does it miss out the cheeks of the wicked and only caress the faces of the righteous?

And what kind of a God commands us to love our enemies and pray for our persecutors, only to burn these very same people for an eternity in Hell himself after we have loved them and prayed for them? Would he frustrate the very love he commanded us to show for them?

So Charles Russell taught that death was simply a state of non existence, and that the wicked were switched off and thrown away permanently without pain.

5 For the living are conscious that they will die; but as for the dead, they are conscious of nothing at all, neither do they anymore have wages, because the remembrance of them has been forgotten (Ecclesiastes 9).

3 Do not put your trust in nobles, Nor in the son of earthling man, to whom no salvation belongs.
4 His spirit goes out, he goes back to his ground; In that day his thoughts do perish (Psalm 146).

Jehovah's Witnesses believe this today. But even though Charles Russell's thinking was good, and even though his thoughts moved mankind a step nearer to God's love, the journey to understanding how deep and how true the love of God is, requires a few more paces than he was able to make. Paces of the mind that is. For all our thoughts are imperfect and all our conclusions are incomplete at first. For how we think is how we walk, one step at a time, and this is the brilliance and consistency of our design. The physical being a mirror of the intellectual.

Tell me, does the 'modern artist' who throws paint all over his canvas and then exhibits it in the Tate Modern, actually create art or is he merely demonstrating his high status in the art world by succeeding in having anything he does hung up on a wall?

Well, please brothers and sisters let us not be 'Modern art bible interpreters' in the sense of being sons of the 'Modern artist' who seeks status through arrogance or other abuse rather than perfection through painstakingly hard work. When Mozart wrote his 3rd string concerto did he just pour out the whole score and then present himself with a medal? Or did he rather start with one melody or with one chord sequence or with one orchestration concept or with one musical phrase, and then slowly build it into a masterpiece, rejecting many many ideas and notes and phrases and orchestrations of such a quality that most composers never produce in a lifetime. Indeed if a composer today could just produce one or two of those rejected phrases, perhaps we'd have some music worth listening to! Or if a script writer today could just produce one or two of the phrases that Shakespeare rejected... The scene in the movie Shakespeare in Love when Jo Fiennes throws away the first act of Romeo and Rosaline, felt like a greater tragedy for posterity than the finished play was for its audience. To be denied a masterpiece from the hand of a writer who plainly sought perfection in his work, is to miss out badly. To be denied another piece of modern art, is frankly a relief and an escape.

We must therefore apply the same diligence to refining and refining our biblical interpretations as the great artists of our race have applied to their works of fame. As the Americans say we must correct our understandings, we must re-correct our understandings and then we must do it all again! We must revise and correct and refine them until they become masterpieces, our masterpieces, our Psalms to God, every bit as polished and every bit as perfect in form as a Concerto from Mozart or as a play from Shakespeare. Then we will see God's glory and reflect it to all those with faith and give it back to him. The Lords' Witnesses have therefore become the church of the revised revised revised understanding, and the corrected corrected corrected mistake. We are the church of the corrected corrected and corrected doctrine and of the revised revised and revised dogma. Rather than having Papal infallibility we have constitutional, bordering on institutional, priestly fallibility.

So here is the setting that the Holy Spirit used to grow in us a glimpse of the love that God has for all of his sons and daughters, saints and sinners alike.

The writer was attempting to write a stage musical about the interaction between the heavens and the earth, he wanted to open up the invisible heavens for all to see. As he was doing this we were reaching the end of the first of the two Jubilees in the LWs (a total forgiveness of the sins of all LWs that occurs every 50 months). A certain very young sister came up with the idea that since during a Jubilee, every disfellowshipped (excommunicated) LW had their sins forgiven by God, he would be automatically re-admitted to the congregation by God, and so would not need a baptism from any priest on earth to become clean in the flesh again. We researched this and found it to be true. We then wrote to several ex LWs and told them that due to God's love for them, they were LWs again period without any discussion.

10 And you must sanctify the 50th year and proclaim liberty in the land to all its inhabitants. It will become a Jubilee for you, and you must return each one to his possession and you should return each one to his family (Leviticus 25).

So every possession you have lost (in terms of real estate) is given back, and every slave is freed and returned to his family every 50th year. It doesn't happen today, but it happened 3400 years ago. The Sabbath timetable of the LWs works in months rather than in years see U103.

This unconditional absolute love, independent of any sin, was a bit of a new concept for us. God was saying: Look, I want you in my family period, and I am just not interested at all in how many sins that you may or may not have committed in the past. This amazed the writer, in particular because he had/has very loving parents, but even they got fed up with him when he behaved very badly. Really this was a new type of love for us. It really knocked the writer out. 

As a sequel to this, the same young sister, started thinking about why humans are condemned to everlasting death as a result of 70 years of sin (as we understood at the time), but Satan, who sinned in the Garden of Eden and has been sinning for millennia since then was still alive today!

She asked the writer the following type of question: If the first new covenant saints sin against the holy spirit during their baptism period they go to Gehenna right? So how come Satan isn't already there, because he has spent eons sinning against the holy spirit, yet he still lives? We should point out that this line of thought has been a fixation of this young sister's family, especially her father, since their baptism. 

Gordon initially thought that the sister was being unrealistic and had watched too many Cinderella movies! Gordon was at that time writing a lament about Satan from God's standpoint for his musical. The chorus started like this:

Its too late to say you're sorry, now the damage has been done,
Its too late to seek forgiveness now the kingdom has begun...

But every time he sang the chorus, which chorus is imagined to be sung by God in the Musical, it just did not feel right. It just was not the sort of thing God would say or sing! So he rewrote it as follows:

Its not too late to say your sorry, for the damage that you've done
Its not to late to seek forgiveness from the highest holy one...

He then burst into tears, because this sounded like the God he was familiar with, this was the God he was singing about. So he then began believing that maybe God watched Cinderella movies too! 

When Gordon was studying with the Jehovah's Witnesses, they told him that Adam was not going to be resurrected because Jesus ransomed Adam's kids, but not Adam himself, who had sinned against the holy spirit. This sin put Adam in Gehenna, so that Adam was now switched off permanently and had basically had his chips - he was told. This made Gordon very sad, for he is a firstborn son himself. He could not see how God could just give up on his firstborn son like that after one screw up. Well, the LWs know today that Adam himself is ransomed directly by Jesus, and that this is how his children are saved. God in a sense created this entire world to save Adam. God did not give up on his firstborn son Adam, no. Rather, knowing in advance that Adam would sin, he built a 6400 kilometre radius planet which was eventually populated by 6 billion of his sons in order to save him. So now Gordon asked himself the same question about Satan, who was certainly born before Adam. If God worked out and saw through to completion, a huge and complicated plan to save Adam, his firstborn human son, would he not be able to work out and see through an even more huge and more complicated plan to save Satan, a son born even before Adam? (in fact Satan was God's firstborn angelic son - see I16).

Then the scriptures came flooding in, and the revised corrected thought processes began once more. Doctrinal somersaults were performed, and what was an imperfect and incomplete half interpretation of Gehenna began to approach art itself, even the art of God.

19 But a certain man was rich, and he used to deck himself with purple and linen, enjoying himself according to day (literal) with magnificence. 
20 But a certain poor [one] named Lazarus had been thrown towards (used to be put at) his gate, having been ulcerated
21 and desiring to be filled with the things dropping from the table of the rich [one]. Yes, too, the dogs would come and lick his ulcers.
22 Now it occurred [that] the poor [one] died and he was carried off by the angels to the bosom of Abraham. Also, the rich [one] died and was buried.
23 And in Hades he lifted up his eyes, he existing in torments, and he saw Abraham afar off and Lazarus in the bosoms of him.
24 So he called and said: Father Abraham, have mercy on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in anguish in this blazing fire.
25 But Abraham said: Child, remember that you received in full your good things in your life, but Lazarus correspondingly the injurious things. Now, however, he is having comfort here but you are in anguish.
26 And besides all these things, a great chasm has been fixed between us and you [people], so that those wanting to go over from here to you [people] cannot, neither may [people] cross over from there to us (Luke 16).

Lazarus is in the bosom of Abraham, which means he is going to be resurrected into the Kingdom of God. But the rich man is in Hades and is existing in torments. There is a chasm between Lazarus and the rich man. Now Hades is the common grave of mankind, in scriptural terms Hades is the first death, physical death. So Lazarus and the Rich man are both in Hades, but there is a chasm dividing them. Now a man existing in torment cannot possibly represent a man who is permanently switched off. Existence cannot stand for non existence. So those who are not in the bosom of Abraham are indeed tormented and in anguish. The Rich man is in Hell, which is Gehenna in Hebrew terminology. Gehenna means the valley of Hinnom outside Jerusalem. This was a rubbish dump which was regularly incinerated. The bodies of criminals were thrown into this dump when they were not considered worthy of a dignified burial. The rich man is being tormented and so is no longer asleep. Lazarus is being comforted and is asked to visit the Rich man, and so is also awake as of course is Abraham who is talking to the rich man. So everyone has been woken up which is their resurrection. The rich man is resurrected out of the first death, the physical death, the unconscious sleep into Gehenna. Lazarus and Abraham are resurrected into the Kingdom of God. Now Jesus advised...

13 But when you spread a feast, invite poor people, crippled, lame, blind,
14 and you will be happy, because they have nothing with which to repay you. For you will be repaid in the resurrection of the righteous ones (Luke 14).

Whereas Paul explains...

15 and I have hope toward God, which hope these [men] themselves also entertain, that there is going to be a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous (Acts 24).

So the unrighteous ones, those who are not in Abraham's bosom, still nonetheless get a resurrection. They get a resurrection into torment and anguish. So the Rich man gets the resurrection of the unrighteous and Lazarus and Abraham get the resurrection of the righteous. 

Now Jesus says about Hell, Gehenna...

28 And do not become fearful of those who kill the body [the first death] but cannot kill the soul [the second death]; but rather be in fear of him that can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna (Matthew 10:28).

Jesus did not say, fear him who can destroy the spirit in Gehenna. Gehenna preserves the spirit but kills the soul, whether angelic or fleshly. The soul here is the associated angelic body and the body is the human body. So Hell or Gehenna is a soul-less consciousness. Truly it is a non physical prison for disembodied spirits. When the unrighteous die, they enter the first death which is non consciousness as they sleep in an angelic body that they do not own. Then they are resurrected into Gehenna as a soul-less spirit.

19 In this [state] also he went his way and preached to the spirits in prison,
20 who had once been disobedient when the patience of God was waiting in Noah's days, while the ark was being constructed, in which a few [ones], that is, 8 souls, were carried safely through the water (1 Peter 3)

So now we can finally understand what Jesus was talking about when he said...

29 If, now, that right eye of yours is making you stumble, tear it out and throw it away from you. For it is more beneficial to you for one of your members to be lost to you than for your whole body to be pitched into Gehenna [a non corporeal existence, whereby you lose all of your body members].

Obviously it is better to be conscious of the loss of one body member than it is to be conscious of the loss of all your body members. And those in Gehenna are faced with precisely that loss. So no physical pain can be felt in Hell, but emotional and psychological torment and anguish is certainly felt there as they see the people whom they have abused and murdered living in paradise on the outside (as the rich man saw Lazarus). But it appears that you do have a form of timeshare access to body members in Gehenna for the psalmist said...

4 Their idols are silver and gold, The work of the hands of earthling man.
5 A mouth they have, but they cannot speak; Eyes they have, but they cannot see;
6 Ears they have, but they cannot hear. A nose they have, but they cannot smell.
7 Hands are theirs, but they cannot feel. Feet are theirs, but they cannot walk; They utter no sound with their throat.
8 Those making them will become just like them, All those who are trusting in them (Psalm 115).

Now Jesus said when he defined Gehenna:

27 But he will speak and say to you, I do not know where you are from. Get away from me, all you workers of unrighteousness!'
28 There is where [your] weeping and the gnashing of [your] teeth will be, when you see Abraham and Isaac and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God, but yourselves thrown outside (Luke 13).

So Gehenna is being thrown outside the kingdom but still 'seeing' those within it. 

So , Come on! In true justice, could the true God punish a man for ever as a result of his sinning for 100 years? Would those scales balance? Would that be an eye for an eye? No sir. So eventually one must get out of Gehenna. For otherwise God is being pointlessly cruel and unjust. Gehenna is a place of emotionally painful rehabilitation. A place of weeping and gnashing teeth until one gets sin straight in ones mind and heart. For God will teach us all and eventually he will save us all. He will succeed with all of us, however bad we are at learning. For he has stated through his great prophet Isaiah that:

10 Everything that is my delight I shall do (Isaiah 46).

And his apostle Paul of the second true Christian church said..

21 For since death is through a man, resurrection of the dead is also through a man.
22 For just as in Adam all are dying, so also in the Christ all will be made alive (1 Corinthians 15).

All will conquer death through the Christ, not some, but all of Adam's sons. All those who die in Adam will get life in Jesus. Gehenna is the second death. No son of Adam will languish there eternally. Jesus fixes all of the problems for all of Adam's kids.

And through Jesus' rock (Peter in Greek), the firstling (Peter in Hebrew), Peter, he has stated that:

9 Jehovah is not slow respecting his promise, as some people consider slowness, but he is patient with you because he does not desire any to be destroyed but desires all to attain to repentance (2 Peter 3).

So if he does not want any to be destroyed, and if he does everything he wants, then he will indeed save even Satan himself. Putting this another way...

3 This is fine and acceptable in the sight of our Savior, God,
4 whose will is that all men [pantaV anqrwpouV] should be saved and come to an accurate knowledge of truth (1 Timothy 2).

Then we have the Lord's prayer...

Our Father who are in heaven, hallowed be thy name, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.

So he will is going to be done everywhere, and his will is that all men should be saved. End of two pice jigsaw!

But if that is too complex for ye great and holy researchers of the perfect word of God, try this one piece jigsaw...

10 For to this end we are working hard and exerting ourselves, because we have rested our hope on a living God, who is a Savior of all men, especially of faithful ones [but also of unfaithful ones through the sin bin of Gehenna].

QED.

Now we know from 1John 4:8 that God is love. The Hebrew meaning of the name Elisha is: God is salvation. The Hebrew meaning of Yeshua (Jesus' Hebrew name) is Jehovah is salvation. So if God is love and God is salvation, then love is salvation, since equality is transitive. Since God loves us all, however unrighteous our behaviour, he will save us all, for that is what love is. 

QED.

Love never fails and we must love our enemies and you cannot love the non existent. Put those together and you see again that everyone will be saved eventually. For love bears all things, love endures all things, even the sort of behaviour that puts us into Gehenna!

QED.

In fact the statement: Love never fails, means that love will succeed with all of us. It means that love will succeed even with Genghis Khan, who will one day become a loving marshmallow like God and he will be saved on that day. It means that love will one day succeed even with Adolf Hitler and Pol Pot. It will succeed with every Hell's angel, every gold digging slapper. Yes, every callous bitch who trampled on love for a few bucks or some meaningless status or worldly security will one day fall into genuine love forever as we all will. Love will succeed with every porno queen who abused the passions of a hundred thousand men, every warmongering politician, every corrupt bureaucrat, every adulterer, every murderer, every paedophile on the list, every paedophile hater, every paedophobe (men who desert their own children, these people may not be on man's sex offenders list but they are certainly on God's) and every paedophobe hater. It means we shall all be saved. Even Ken Livinstone will one day be saved (after apologising to a few million drivers). Yes even Donald Rumsfeld will one day be saved (after apologising to a few million Iraqis). Even the feminists who have destroyed the headship of the husband in the west which has led to all the teenage gang violence. For love never fails. And love's success is our salvation.

So now we can truly understand what Paul was saying in 1 Corinthians 5...

5 You hand such a man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, in order that the spirit may be saved in the day of the
Lord (1Corinthians5). 

The flesh that is destroyed when a man is thrown out of the congregation is the blessing of the ICC, a non adamic human body. For this is the possession of all those with a water baptism. But even the disfellowshipped man, who has no fleshly hope, will have his spirit saved in the day of the Lord, which day is the 1,000 year kingdom of God. It is saved by being kept alive in Gehenna, in a shared body with a mouth that cannot speak and eyes that cannot see and ears that cannot hear, since they are time shared with several other condemned ones, his soul-mates.

The Watchtower argues that no loving parent would hold their son’s hand on a hotplate for a thousand years, so people are not tortured in Hell but simply terminated permanently. The Lords' Witnesses argue that neither would loving parents cause their son to disappear forever. For the former is an abuse of love, and the latter is an absence of love. God suffers from neither. So Gehenna is an external rehabilitation of an emotionally painful type.  

It is like Hugh Grant sang in the movie Music and Lyrics: Don't write me off just yet!
And it is like Arnie said in the movie Terminator: I'll be back!

But does his love extend only to his human sons? Hell, No, he has a cunning plan to save even Satan himself. And he will execute it (the plan that is, not Satan), because it shall be his very delight so to do. Because his love knows no bounds at all and it is not only greater than his justice, but is in fact the whole basis of his justice. It is the father of his justice. The relationship between justice and love is exposed by Paul who says:

12 and because of the increasing of lawlessness the love of the greater number will cool off (Matthew 24).

Law, Justice, is the greenhouse in which love grows best. Injustice grows hate, which causes conflict and injury.

And yes, just as the true God created the whole 6400 km radius earth to save his firstborn human son, Adam. Every one of his sons, both angelic and human, will one day realise that he created the whole 15 billion light year radius universe to save his firstborn angelic son, Satan. And then we will all know the invincibility of the love of our father and the lengths to which he is prepared to go to save us. You do not believe it? Your heart cannot see it? You think that is too hard for God? Is his heart not big enough? Do you think that love will conquer everything except Satan? Well then listen to Jesus' words, spoken in response to Peter's weakness. And compare them to the words he used to call Andrew and Peter and the words he used to call his other his disciples...

23 Get thee behind me Satan (Matthew16)
19 Come after me (Mark4)
9 Be my follower (Matthew9)

Literally Jesus was calling Peter a resister, Satan means 'resister'. He was reminding Peter to follow his lead rather than trying to lead himself. But every scripture means more than the literal meaning, for they are all alive and powerful. Jesus was with the same words speaking direcly to Satan. He was telling him to become his diisciple and follow his path to divinity. In fact Jesus was actually about to give a ransom that would save Satan in any event!

So this might be a good time to consider the words of Romeo when he compares non existence to banishment, i.e. when he compares the Hell of Russell (permanent non existence) to the Hell of Ritchie (soul-less exile)...

ROMEO
What less than dooms-day is the prince's doom?

FRIAR LAURENCE
A gentler judgment vanish'd from his lips, not body's death, but body's banishment.

ROMEO
Ha, banishment! be merciful, say 'death',  for exile hath more terror in his look, much more than death: do not say 'banishment.'

FRIAR LAURENCE
Hence from Verona art thou banished. Be patient, for the world is broad and wide.

ROMEO
There is no world without Verona walls, but purgatory, torture, hell itself. Hence-banished is banish'd from the world,
and world's exile is death: then banished, is death mis-term'd. Calling death banishment, thou cutt'st my head off with a golden axe, and smilest upon the stroke that murders me.

FRIAR LAURENCE
O deadly sin! O rude unthankfulness! Thy fault our law calls death; but the kind prince, taking thy part, hath rush'd aside the law, and turn'd that black word death to banishment. This is dear mercy, and thou seest it not.

ROMEO
'Tis torture, and not mercy. Heaven is here, where Juliet lives, and every cat and dog and little mouse, every unworthy thing, live here in heaven and may look on her, but Romeo may not. More validity, more honourable state, more courtship lives in carrion-flies than Romeo. They may seize on the white wonder of dear Juliet's hand and steal immortal blessing from her lips, who even in pure and vestal modesty, still blush, as thinking their own kisses sin. But Romeo may not, he is banished. Flies may do this, but I from this must fly. They are free men, but I am banished. And say'st thou yet that exile is not death? Hadst thou no poison mix'd, no sharp-ground knife, no sudden mean of death, though ne'er so mean. But 'banished' to kill me?--'banished'? O friar, the damned use that word in hell. Howlings attend it, how hast thou the heart,
being a divine, a ghostly confessor, a sin-absolver, and my friend profess'd, to mangle me with that word 'banished'?

You cannot love someone who is permanently dead!

The simplest way to see that no one will die permanently is to read Jesus' command to love even our enemies...

44 However, I say to you: Continue to love your enemies and to pray for those persecuting you (Matthew 5).
27 But I say to you who are listening: Continue to love your enemies, to do good to those hating you (Luke 6). 

God is not a hypocrite, so he loves his enemy Satan. But one cannot love someone who is permanently dead. So Satan will never be permanently dead. Indeed why would God command us to love our enemies and then kill them at Armageddon, thereby making it impossible for us to love them? One cannot love a person who will never again be resurrected? The requirement to love everyone means that everyone will be resurrected, and no one will die permanently.  

Paul defined love as follows...

Love never fails (1 Corinthians 13:8).

So therefore at what point does God's love for Satan fail? The answer is at no point does it ever fail. He will be saved. God will teach him to conquer his sin. Any less would be a failure of God's love and that is one thing that is impossible.

The Precise state of those in Hell

28 And do not become fearful of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; but rather be in fear of him that can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna (Matthew 10)

29 If, now, that right eye of yours is making you stumble, tear it out and throw it away from you. For it is more beneficial to you for one of your members to be lost to you than for your whole body to be pitched into Gehenna.
30 Also, if your right hand is making you stumble, cut it off and throw it away from you. For it is more beneficial to you for one of
your members to be lost than for your whole body to land in Gehenna (Matthew 5).

43 And if ever your hand makes you stumble, cut it off; it is finer for you to enter into life maimed than with two hands to go off
into Gehenna, into the fire that cannot be put out.
45 And if your foot makes you stumble, cut it off; it is finer for you to enter into life lame than with two feet to be pitched into
Gehenna.
47 And if your eye makes you stumble, throw it away; it is finer for you to enter one-eyed into the kingdom of God than with two eyes to be pitched into Gehenna (Mark 9).

19 But a certain man was rich, and he used to deck himself with purple and linen, enjoying himself from day to day with magnificence.
20 But a certain beggar named Lazarus used to be put at his gate, full of ulcers
21 and desiring to be filled with the things dropping from the table of the rich man. Yes, too, the dogs would come and lick his ulcers.
22 Now in course of time the beggar died and he was carried off by the angels to the bosom [position] of Abraham. Also, the rich man died and was buried.
23 And in Hades he lifted up his eyes, he existing in torments, and he saw Abraham afar off and Lazarus in the bosom [position] with him.
24 So he called and said, 'Father Abraham, have mercy on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in anguish in this blazing fire.'
25 But Abraham said, 'Child, remember that you received in full your good things in your lifetime, but Lazarus correspondingly the injurious things. Now, however, he is having comfort here but you are in anguish.
26 And besides all these things, a great chasm has been fixed between us and you people, so that those wanting to go over from here to you people cannot, neither may people cross over from there to us.'
27 Then he said, 'In that event I ask you, father, to send him to the house of my father,
28 for I have 5 brothers, in order that he may give them a thorough witness, that they also should not get into this place of torment.'
29 But Abraham said, 'They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to these.'
30 Then he said, 'No, indeed, father Abraham, but if someone from the dead goes to them they will repent.'
31 But he said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead (Luke 16).

So the body is destroyed in Gehenna but not the head which can talk, hear, see and has a tongue! And the soul is destroyed as we read in Matthew 10. Also no head is self sustaining, it must remain plugged into something. But that something is not a soul and is not its own body. A living soul is a self sustaining body with a spirit in it. And dead soul is a dead body with no spirit in it. Gehenna is like Legion, possesed by 6,000 demons and the 3 in a pig sequel. The account prophetically tells us what demons want in Gehenna. Gehenna is worse than having 6,000 demons in a man but is better than having 3 demons in a pig. So one exists in a multi-spirited beast as it were. A time-shared body for a multiplicity of spirits.

If a soul in the Kingdom is a driver in a car then the spirits in Gehenna are passengers or drivers in a fleet of buses. Surely every Londoner suspected that Hell would have bendy buses in it!

We learn from the great chasm in the parable of the rich man and Lazarus that you cannot visit people in Gehenna, but fathers can communicate with their immediate children via a duplex video link. And children in Gehenna can communicate with fathers in the Kingdom. But the rich man was unable to communicate directly with Lazarus or with his own brothers. He had to go through Abraham. So those in Gehenna can only speak to their nearest father in the kingdom of God. This father then becomes their priest, their prison visitor.

The Second Death

1 And I saw an angel coming down out of heaven with the key of the abyss and a great chain in his hand [new subaccount].
2 And he seized the dragon [accusative], who is the serpent, the ancient [nominatives] a Devil [slanderer] and the Satan [the opposer] [All these designations refer to Satan's entire heavenly organisation, not merely to Satan himself who is the head of the serpent and the head of the dragon], and bound him for 1,000 years [from around 650 AD to 1650 AD, certainly between 444Tishri when FDS2 lost its water baptism and 1884Tishri when FDS3 started its water baptism and probably after the Koran was inspired, since Satan is a mimic God. His trade mark is large empires. Satan and the demons went inside after the Roman empire fell and came out before the British empire rose.]
3 And he hurled him into the abyss and shut [it] and sealed [it] over him, that he might not mislead the nations anymore until the 1,000 years were ended. After these things he must be let loose for a little while [mikron cronon] [and the put back in the abyss of Gehenna in 2008].

4 And I saw thrones, and there were those who sat down on them, and power of judging was given them [1NC and 2NC kings]. Yes, I saw the souls of those beheaded due to the witness of/to Jesus and due to the word of God, and those who had worshiped neither the wild-beast nor its image and who had not received the mark upon their forehead and upon their hand. And they came to life and reigned with the Christ for 1,000 years [from 2008Nisan to 3008Nisan].
5 The rest of the dead [non sanctified, judicially second dead] did not come to life [get born again] until the 1,000 years [of the Kingdom of God] were ended [be they unsanctified citizens of the kingdom or inmates of Gehenna]. This [the coming to life of the kings of verse 4] [is] the resurrection, the first.
6 Happy and holy is anyone having part in the resurrection, the first, over these the second death has no authority but they will be priests of God and of the Christ, and will reign with him for the 1,000 years [they are sealed in holy spirit, they cannot ever be put into Gehenna, the second death, a soul-less existence as a spirit].
7 Now as soon as the 1,000 years [of the sentence on Satan's organisation] have been ended Satan will be let loose out of his prison [in around 1650 AD we think],
8 and he will go out to mislead the nations, the [ones] in the 4 corners of the earth, the [antitypical] Gog [he is] and [the antitypical] Magog [is his land/administration] [Gog the chieftain of the land of Magog launched a disastrous attack on Israel and got pestilence, blood, flooding downpour, hailstones, fire and sulphur from Jehovah who sanctified himself at Gog's expense in Ezekiel 38,39 - In the final part of the years you will come to the land - In the final part of the days it will occur and I shall certainly bring you against my land - the prophets of Israel who were prophesying in those days, years as to bringing you in upon them], to gather them together for the war [there is no war in the Kingdom of God - they will learn war no more - Isaiah 2:4, Micah 4:3. So this war is Armageddon]. The number of these is as the sand of the sea.
9 And they advanced over the breadth of the earth and encircled the camp of the holy ones and the city, the [one] having been loved. But fire came down out of heaven and devoured them [this being the greater flood of lava, the flood of fire, the greater destruction of Sodom, the end of this world by volcanic eruption, an extinction level event - see U154].
10 And the Devil, the [one] deceiving them [Satan's heavenly slandering organisation, but not its individual members] was hurled into the lake of the fire and sulphur [everlasting destruction], where both the wild-beast [the UN as an organisation, but not its members] and the false prophet [already were] [the US/UK world power, but not their citizens]. And they will be tormented day and night forever and ever [no more false prophets, wild beasts or heavenly slanderers]

11 And I saw a great white throne and the one seated on it. From before him the earth and the heaven fled away, and no place was found for them.
12 And I saw the dead [judicially second dead, those not sanctified], the great and the small, standing before the throne, and scrolls were opened. But another scroll was opened; it is the scroll of life. And the dead were judged out of those things written in the scrolls [one scroll would be the heavenly records of sins against ones conscience, the other would be the heavenly record of sins against the law of any true church] according to their deeds.
13 And the sea [everyone not in the earth, God's true church, the LWs] gave up those dead in it [to be sorted into faithful and faithless by Jesus through his wife after 2008Iyyar29], and death and Hades gave up those dead in them [The first death gets bypassed and everyone who dies during Armageddon goes straight into Gehenna to watch the rest of the battle from there, without falling asleep in Hades. Hades then gives up its death by resurrection throughout the kingdom, in reverse order of dying], and they were judged individually according to their deeds.
14 And death and Hades were hurled into the lake of fire [Physical dying 'death' and being physically dead, in the first death in Hades are temporarily abolished - for at least 1,000 years]. This is the death, the second, the lake of fire [everyone in Hades ends up either in the Kingdom of God or in Gehenna after all the resurrections out of Hades have finished].
15 Furthermore, whoever was not found written in the book of life was hurled into the lake of fire [you definitely want to be in this book, the book of the FRC] (Revelation 20).

Death and Hades are thrown into the lake of fire, not the lake of fire and sulphur, just the lake of fire. Now the symbolic difference between the lake of fire and the lake of fire and sulphur, is that the latter lake has sulphur which keeps the fire going. So the former lake, the lake of fire, does not keep going. So it lasts for a fixed period of time. But the lake of fire and sulphur lasts for a longer period of time or possibly forever.

We are told that the lake of fire is the second death. So the lake of fire and sulphur is the second death continuing indefinitely, but being thrown into the lake of fire is a fixed prison term in the second death. Now all of those who break their spirit baptism are judged adversely, and experience the second death, which is Gehenna. But since this death is represented not by the lake of fire and sulphur, but rather by the lake of fire alone, they only experience this for a fixed period of time. Gehenna is in fact a sin bin which lasts indefinitely, but the max length of any sentence is the 1,000 years of the Kingdom of God.

4 For it is impossible as regards those who have once for all been enlightened, and who have tasted the heavenly free gift, and who have become partakers of holy spirit, 
5 and who have tasted the fine word of God and powers of the coming system of things, 
6 but who have fallen away, to revive them again to repentance, because they impale the Son of God afresh for themselves and expose him to public shame (Hebrews 6).

28 Truly I say to you that all things will be forgiven the sons of men, no matter what sins and blasphemies they blasphemously commit.
29 However, whoever blasphemes against the holy spirit has no forgiveness for time indefinite/forever, but is guilty of indefinitely/ever lasting sin.
30 This, because they were saying: He has an unclean spirit. (Mark 3).

32 For example, whoever speaks a word against the Son of man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the holy spirit, it will not be forgiven him, no, not in this system of things nor in that to come (Matthew 12:32).

These three scriptures are all referring to the same thing, which is actually a breaking of one's spirit baptism. This makes one an 'unclean spirit' (Mark 3). The Greek word aiwnion can mean 'indefinitely lasting' or 'everlasting' dependent on the context. Breaking a spirit baptism puts you straight into Gehenna. There is no forgiveness says Jesus in Matthew, not in this system of things, nor in the one to come (the Kingdom of God). Now let us think about that carefully worded holy statement. We already know that there was forgiveness for the sin against the holy spirit for Adam in the system before this system, which was the edenic system. So the omission of this edenic system from Jesus' words was deliberate. But Jesus also omits the system after the Kingdom of God. So we can deduce from that omission that in the system after the Kingdom of God (which is the system after the system to come), one can be forgiven. So if you break your spirit baptism, you are in Gehenna, in the lake of fire, you experience the second death, for the duration of the Kingdom of God only. 

When Paul said, Death where is your victory, death where is your sting, he did not exclude the second death from his utterance. So speaking clearly we can now say on behalf of all those who do not make it to the Kingdom of God, 50% of us: Second death, where is your victory? And on behalf of the 50% of us that do make it into the Kingdom of God, we say: Second death, where is your sting?

55 Death, where is your victory? Death, where is your sting? (1 Corinthians 15).

For our God has stated through his great prophet Isaiah that:

10 Everything that is my delight I shall do (Isaiah 46).

And his apostle Paul of the second true Christian church said..

21 For since death is through a man, resurrection of the dead is also through a man.
22 For just as in Adam all are dying, so also in the Christ all will be made alive (1 Corinthians 15).

All will conquer death through the Christ, not some but all of Adam's sons. All those who die in Adam will get life in Jesus. Gehenna is the second death. No son of Adam will languish there indefinitely. Jesus fixes all of the problems for all of Adam's kids, even the ones who get the resurrection of the unrighteous, a resurrection into Gehenna... 

15 and I have hope toward God, which hope these [men] themselves also entertain, that there is going to be a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous (Acts 24). 

for the book of life is the book of those whom God declares righteous (not that they actually are in their works, but they are in their disposition). For Paul says, referring to this declaration... 

17 just as it is written: I have appointed you a father of many nations. This was in the sight of the One in whom he had faith, even of God, who makes the dead alive and calls the things that are not as though they were (Romans 4).

But those who do not make it to the book of life, those who are not declared righteous, those who get the resurrection of the unrighteous end up in Hell, which is Gehenna. So Gehenna is the second death. So the first death is a non conscious existence in a sleeping angel and the second death is a conscious existence in a prison with no body. 

Angels and Gehenna

Angels cannot abuse the life of angels, since their bodies are not mortal. Neither can they abuse the procreation, life giving process of angels since angels do not reproduce sexually. So the only way for an angel to be sentenced to death is if he or she interacts with humans and abuses human life. Satan and the demons who came down before the flood have both done this. They will therefore go into Gehenna. The only way out of Gehenna is through the sacrifice of Michael who ransomed Adam angelically. 

But any son of Adam by covenant must be what Adam was, since Adam is his covenant father and like begets like. So all hs covenanted sons are humans with associated angels. Furthermore the route into the ARC is through either FRC sand the CRC. So one must be a human to enter into the ARC. So the demons and Satan will be resurrected from Gehenna as humans. They are actually ransomed out of that place by Gabriel and the CRC as a result of repentance if they come out during the thousand years and perhaps after1,000 years they just get resurrected anyway but under the CRC??

Satan will end up as a son of the parents whom he abused. And the angels who lusted after flesh will become the very flesh they lusted after. Tartarus is the angelic holding pen for Gehenna. Gehenna is the reform prison for both errant humans and errant angels who have abused life. But angels can only abuse life by interacting with humans. They can only abuse human life as it is not possible to abuse an angelic soul. So we all end up in the same place having all committed the same type of offence.

6 And the angels that did not keep their original position but forsook their own proper dwelling place he has reserved with indefinitely lasting bonds under dense darkness for the judgment of the great day [the 1,000 year long great day] (Jude).

Gehenna is not inaugurated until the Kingdom of God starts. The demons have been in Tartarus since the flood and will be transferred to Gehenna during the kingdom.

4 Certainly if God did not hold back from punishing the angels that sinned, but, by throwing them into Tartarus, delivered them to pits of darkness to be reserved for judgment (2 Peter 2).

18 Why, even Christ died once for all time concerning sins, a righteous [person] for unrighteous ones, that he might lead you to God, he being put to death in the flesh, but being made alive in the spirit.
19 In this [state] [dead in the flesh but alive in the spirit] also he went his way and preached to the spirits in prison (1 Peter 3).

44 It is sown a physical body, it is raised up a spiritual body. If there is a physical body, there is also a spiritual one [the body of an angel or the body of a God] (1 Corinthians 15).

So the angels in Tartarus are in their angelic bodies but in darkness, cut off from the light and in prison. The lose their angelic souls in Gehenna, where they share a soul with various other soul-mates. Since 'pits' is plural it looks like each angel has his own pit. Furthermore the practice of the ancient humans was to put people individually into pits as prisons...

20 Should bad be repaid for good? For they have excavated a pit for my soul. Remember my standing before you to speak good even concerning them, to turn back your rage from them.
21 Therefore give their sons over to the famine, and deliver them over to the power of the sword; and may their wives become women bereaved of children, and widows. And may their own men become those killed with deadly plague, their young men those struck down with the sword in the battle.
22 Let a cry be heard out of their houses, when you bring upon them suddenly a marauder band. For they have excavated a pit to capture me, and traps they have hid for my feet (Jeremiah 18).

'Pit' can also mean the first death...

29 There is where Edom, her kings and all her chieftains are, who, in their mightiness, were put with those slain by the sword;
they themselves will lie down even with the uncircumcised ones and with those going down into [the] pit (Ezekiel 32).

So Tartarus would appear to be a form of solitary confinement (social death) for demons wherein they are cut off in a manner not dissimilar from the first death. Essentially Tartarus is a living angelic first death! But humans from the first death and angels from Tartarus both end up in the second death. Tartarus is angelic sheol or hades. 

________________________________________

Note1: In Matthew 25 in some translations (the NWT is quoted below) we read:

46 And these will depart into everlasting cutting-off, but the righteous ones into everlasting life (Matthew 25).

But again the Greek Word aiwnion can mean indefinitely lasting or everlasting dependent on the context (William Mounce - Analytical Lexicon to the Greek New testament). So we would translate this verse as:

46 And these will depart into indefinitely lasting cutting-off, but the righteous ones into indefinitely lasting life (Matthew 25).

The righteous ones are righteous in the flesh, since they were not in the true religion - see I29. So they do not have everlasting life, they have indefinitely lasting life. Only those righteous in the spirit have everlasting life. So we must translate aiwnion as meaning indefinitely lasting in the case of those getting life and therefore it must also mean indefinitely lasting in the case of those getting cutting off.

Note2:

There has been a long standing debate amongst criminologists between the proponents of retributive justice and the proponents of rehabilitative justice. The former group believe in punishment as a deterrent and for the sake of justice or vengeance. The latter believe in punishment for the sake of teaching. The above understanding shows us that God manages to combine both views, for he believes in punishment for all three reasons (the former view has two reasons). But he does not believe in punishment merely for vengeance or merely as a deterrent, there is always a lesson to be learned. God does not support punishment without teaching. He would never support a life sentence which leaves the criminal with no hope. Even Satan has no such sentence. But neither would he support 18 months in prison for rape. The penalty for murder or rape in the days from Adam to Moses was 7 years outside the camp, i.e. in prison if the camp is the whole country, as it is today. Not a day less and not a day more. The purpose of discipline is to teach. The reader may be asking why did God give a 7 year penalty for murder to the sons of Adam (Genesis 4:15), but a death sentence to the sons of Moses (Exodus 21:12). Since God's justice is supposed to be constant how can he be setting these two different punishments for the same crime? The answer would appear to be that death is a temporary imprisonment in any event. In fact one could use this argument to prove that there must be a resurrection from death, just as there is a release from prison.

But as regards those who abuse and who steal human life and those who persistently trash human love, everlasting death is too good for them, let them go to hell for 1,000 years! For there, by losing both of them, they will indeed learn the exceeding value of life and of love. In the present world, some children, such as the orphans of Beslan or of AIDS have never seen much love. One of the kids of Beslan said: There is no God. This is why God cannot permit this system to last much longer. Every child deserves a loving template and God will ensure that one way or another, in one system or the other, they get one.

Note3:

Suicide bombers and politicians who damage or destroy innocent people's bodies in order to make political statements, or to maintain political power will not get 70,000 virgins when they die as some believe. They will not even get a physical body. Instead they will have 1,000 years of non corporeal existence in a sin bin from which they cannot possibly escape, in order to contemplate their misguided wickedness as they watch a lot more than 70,000 virgins in the kingdom of God loving and being loved by people who are not murderers. However God never leaves anyone without hope. There will be an early parole system for those who truly repent and learn the vital lessons that God is teaching us during the 1,000 year kingdom of God.

Note4:

It is possible to get early parole from Gehenna, and be released from Hell into the Kingdom of God during the 1,000 years. Genesis 5 has the timetable for this early parole. But if you have been born again and lose faith and end up in Gehenna, then you are ineligible for any early parole...

24 True, the Son of man is going away, just as it is written concerning him, but woe to that man through whom the Son of man is betrayed! It would have been finer for him if that man had not been born [again] (Matthew 26).

32 For example, whoever speaks a word against the Son of man, it will be forgiven him. But whoever speaks against the holy spirit, it will not be forgiven him, no, not in this system of things nor in that to come (Matthew 12).

A man who sins against the holy spirit, i.e. breaks his spirit baptism, will not be forgiven either in this system or the next, so you cannot get early parole from Gehenna. You can only be forgiven after the Kingdom of God. When God blesses you, if you show no gratitude, you end up worse than if he hadn't blessed you. This was the case with Judas. Judas guaranteed himself a 1,000 year prison sentence when he broke his baptism. But if he had never showed any faith at all, he would in fact have been better off, having a shot at getting out of Hell during the 1,000 years. The Jews under law were physically blessed from 1513 to 604 BC, then having shown no gratitude (as a group) they were physically cursed for 2520 years from 604 BC to 1917 AD - see U121. They are no longer under that curse however.

[15]  120, 240, 480, 960 and indefinite lifespan humans!

We are now going to discover the 4 types of human body that God created for sons of Adam and the maximum lifespan of each type of body. We need this information to determine which characters in the bible lived too long for their generation and were therefore non adamic like Jesus was. By this we mean characters who were sons of God rather than sons of Adam. We need to know all of the non adamic characters in the bible, the characters who are not under any death sentence from Adam or at all, because they all die sacrificially in order to ransom a mediator of a salvation covenant. And salvation covenants are the legal means by which mankind is saved into the Kingdom of God. Every salvation covenant gives you a future life in the form of a resurrection or a rapture because a non adamic human gave his life for that covenant - see I28.

Below is a table of the ages of the Patriarchs from Adam to Moses. There are 3 biblical texts that the table is based upon. Firstly we have the BHS text (Bilblia Hibraica Stuttgartensia), which is the standard Hebrew text of the old testament written and preserved by the Jewish Masoretic Scribes. This text is also called the Masoretic text, and the true version of it is the inspired and holy Hebrew text of the old testament. Secondly there is the Samaritan Pentateuch. This is a copy of the first five books of the Masoretic text, which make up the law of Moses made by the Samaritan scribes who worshipped on Mount Gerizim in Samaria. The Samaritans did not accept the Psalms or the prophets as a part of the holy bible. The Samaritan Pentateuch, being a copy from the old Hebrew of Moses into the Hebrew spoken at the time of the exile of the people of Samaria into captivity in Assyria, is not inspired or holy. However it does contain some true information that is absent from the Masoretic text. Thirdly there is the LXX (the Septuagint), which is the first Greek translation of the old testament made in Alexandria by 70 Greek speaking Jewish Scholars in the third century BC (between 284 BC and 247 BC according to Sir Lancelot Brenton, an LXX translator into English). The LXX, being a translation is neither holy nor inspired, but again it does contain some true information which is absent from the Masoretic. The 3 texts differ substantially in Genesis 5 and in Genesis 11. We use the Codex Alexandrinus version of the LXX (LXXa, in the British Library) rather than the Vatican version (LXXv, which has obvious mistakes in Genesis 11) - see U506 and U102 on the research website. The LXX tends to follow the Samaritan Pentateuch where it differs from the Masoretic text. The New Testament tends to quote the LXX when quoting the old testament, since the LXX was written in Greek as the New Testatment is. This is not a problem, because every LXX word quoted in the new testament then becomes holy and inspired, even though the LXX itself was neither for the most part. However to our great surprise we have discovered that there are a few accounts in the Alexandrinus version of the LXX rendering of the Law of Moses that are holy and inspired, since the scripture says:

24 After that Moses went out and spoke to the people the words of Jehovah. And he went gathering seventy men from the older men of the people and proceeded to have them stand round about the tent.
25 Then Jehovah came down in a cloud and spoke to him and took away some of the spirit that was upon him and put it upon each of the 70 older men. And it came about that as soon as the spirit settled down upon them, then they proceeded to act as prophets; but they did not do it again (Numbers 11).

The 70 older men symbolize the 70 Jews at Alexandria who translated the LXX we are saying. Since the spirit was taken away from Moses and put on these 70 men, there is inspired information missing from the 5 books of Moses in the BHS which is present in the LXX. Also the LXX includes Cainan as the son of Arpachshad, and this is confirmed by Luke 3. So again the LXX is for the most part neither holy nor directly inspired. However the holy spirit has inspired some parts of the Law, the first 5 books of the LXX and we shall discover that the History of Shem in Genesis 11, is one of those parts. We are in effect saying that really some parts of the Law in the LXX should be in the bible cannon. The incredible thing is that there are some authorities which claim there were 70 translators of the LXX in Alexandria and other claim there were 72. Whereas 70 older men got some of the spirit from Moses and it is not clear whether Eldad and Medad were included in their number and yet Jesus designated 70 disciples in addition to the apostles and sent them forth by twos (Luke 10).

The BHS describes the ages of the patriarchs in Genesis 11 when they stopped procreating, whereas the Samaritan Pentateuch and the LXX describe their ages when they died. 

Genesis 11 from the BHS text

10 Shem was 100 years old when he became father to Arpachshad 2 years after the deluge.
11 And after his fathering Arpachshad Shem continued to live 500 years and/whilst he became father to sons and daughters.
12 And Arpachshad lived 35 years. Then he became father to Shelah.
13 And after his fathering Shelah, Arpachshad continued to live 403 years and/whilst he became father to sons and daughters.
14 And Shelah lived 30 years. Then he became father to Eber.
15 And after his fathering Eber Shelah continued to live 403 years and/whilst he became father to sons and daughters.
16 And Eber lived on for 34 years. Then he became father to Peleg.
17 And after his fathering Peleg, Eber continued to live 430 years and/whilst he became father to sons and daughters.
18 And Peleg lived on for 30 years. Then he became father to Reu.
19 And after his fathering Reu, Peleg continued to live 209 years and/whilst he became father to sons and daughters.
20 And Reu lived on for 32 years. Then he became father to Serug.
21 And after his fathering Serug, Reu continued to live 207 years and/whilst he became father to sons and daughters.
22 And Serug lived on for 30 years. Then he became father to Nahor.
23 And after his fathering Nahor, Serug continued to live 200 years and/whilst he became father to sons and daughters.
24 And Nahor lived on for 29 years. Then he became father to Terah.
25 And after his fathering Terah, Nahor continued to live 119 years and/whilst he became father to sons and daughters.
26 And Terah lived on for 70 years, and he fathered namely Abram, Nahor and Haran (Genesis 11 - BHS).

32 And the days of Terah came to be 205 years. Then Terah died in Haran (Genesis 11).

The Hebrew is ambiguous. The Hebrew word 'and' could mean 'whilst', in which case the account only give the procreative lifespan of the patriarch.

Genesis 11 from the SP text

Shem was 100 years old when he begat Arpachshad 2 years after the flood. And Shem lived after he had begat Arpachshad 500 years and begat sons and daughters (and died).
And Arpachshad lived 135 years and begat Shelah. And Arpachshad lived after he begat Shelah 303 years and begat sons and daughters (and died).
And Shelah lived 130 years and begat Eber. And Shelah lived after he begat Eber 303 years and begat sons and daughters (and died).
And Eber lived 134 years and begat Peleg. And Eber lived after he begat Peleg 370 years and begat sons and daughters (and died).
And Peleg 130 years and begat Ragau (Reu). And Peleg lived after he begat Reu 109 years and begat sons and daughters (and died).
And Reu lived 132 years and begat Seruch (Serug). And Reu lived after he begat Serug 107 years and begat sons and daughters (and died).
And Serug lived 130 years and begat Nahor. And Serug lived after he begat Nahor 100 years and begat sons and daughters (and died).
And Nahor lived 79 years years and begat Tarrha (Terah). And Nahor lived after he begat Terah 69 years and begat sons and daughters (and died).
And Terah lived 70 years and begat Abram Nahor and Haran (Genesis 11, Samaritan Pentateuch).

Genesis 11 from the LXXa text

Shem was 100 years old when he begat Arpachshad 2 years after the flood. And Shem lived after he had begat Arpachshad 500 years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Arpachshad lived 135 years and begat Cainan. And Arpachshad lived after he begat Cainan 430 [400 LXXv] years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Cainan lived 130 years and begat Sala (Shelah) and Cainan lived after he begat Shelah 330 years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Shelah lived 130 years and begat Heber (Eber). And Shelah lived after he begat Eber 330 years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Eber lived 134 years and begat Peleg. And Eber lived after he begat Peleg 370 [270 LXXv] years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Peleg 130 years and begat Ragau (Reu). And Peleg lived after he begat Reu 209 years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Reu lived 132 years and begat Seruch (Serug). And Reu lived after he begat Serug 207 years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Serug lived 130 years and begat Nahor. And Serug lived after he begat Nahor 200 years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Nahor lived 79 years years and begat Tarrha (Terah). And Nahor lived after he begat Terah 129 years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Terah lived 70 years and begat Abram Nahor and Haran (Genesis 11, LXX Alexandrinus).

If we put the LXXa together with the BHS, then since the patriarchs, with the exception of Shem, all lived longer in the LXXa, we deduce that the latter of the two possible meanings of the BHS mentioned above must be correct. So the BHS must be referring to procreative lifespans. In the BHS text, the patriarchs procreate but are not said to die (until Terah). In the LXX (Alexandrinus) text they die at an age which is older than the BHS gives for them stopping procreation except in the case of Shem. In the SP the total age given is the same as the BHS except in the case of Eber. We do not as yet know whether the SP includes the words "and died" we are researching this.

The LXXa and the SP both give an incorrect figure for the length of life of Noah's father Lamech in Genesis 5. They have him dying aged 753 whereas the BHS has him dying aged 777. So the LXXa cannot be inspired for this particular chapter of Genesis.

The LXX in Genesis 11, has the extra patriarch Cainan who is also referred to in Luke 3 in the line to Jesus. So the LXXa looks like it might be inspired for Genesis 11. The SP and LXX have different ages for the procreations of the sons (100 years older). 

The translators of the SP believed that the patriarchs were giving the physical birth years of these various sons, and for some reason added 100 years to them. The LXX just followed the SP in this regard. But due to our decoding of the Masoretic version of Genesis 11, and due to the different wording between the BHS and the LXX, and due to the LXX having some parts being inspired, we have deduced that the ages given in the LXX for births are the ages of the baptisms in holy spirit of the sons by their fathers. They are spiritual births, they are the dates when the sons were born again. For everyone in the line to Jesus from Adam was born again including Adam himself. This was not a judicially dead line, but a living line. In other words we are saying that the LXXa is inspired for Genesis 11.

The age at death of Eber is given as 504 years in both the SP and the LXX but he is said to have continued to live whilst procreating for 464 years in the BHS. So we deduce that he stopped having kids aged 464 and died aged 504.

The LXX is giving ages when the patriarchs baptised their sons in holy spirit, at which time they were born again. So the BHS has physical birth and the LXX has spiritual birth. 

From this table it is apparent that man's age has fallen from between 777 and 969 before the flood, to around 339 - 565 just after the flood to around 120-208 from Nahor to Moses and then to a maximum of 120 years after Moses. This may all seem rather fanciful today to many readers. Although it will not appear fanciful to Star Trek or other Sci Fi enthusiasts of course! However the LWs know that the chronologies of Genesis are correct to the year, since we have used them in all sorts of consistent long term prophecies. 

Now God himself decreed before the flood that the maximum lifespan of mankind would become 120 years. The Interlinear New International Version Hebrew Old Testament NIVHEOT (Zondervan) has...

3 Not he will contend, spirit of me, in the man, until time indefinite, because he has erred/because he is mortal. And they will be, days of him, 120 years (Genesis 6 - NIVHEOT)

This was fulfilled by Moses and everyone born after him. Moses lived for 120 years to the day, dying on his 120th BLC birthday.

2 and said to them: 120 years old I am today. I shall no more be allowed to go out and come in, as Jehovah has said to me, You will not cross this Jordan (Deuteronomy 31).

7 And Moses was 120 years old at his death. His eye had not grown dim, and his vital strength had not fled (Deuteronomy 34).

Josephus, the famous Jewish Historian, who was a contemporary of Jesus said, when describing the descent of man from the Ark:

For the life of man was already, by degrees, diminished, and became shorter than before, till the birth of Moses; after whom the term of human life was one hundred and twenty years, God determining it to the length that Moses happened to live.

But were there any other age limits on mankind during this descent? Here we get some help from Peleg and Reu in the BHS.

16 And Eber lived on for 34 years. Then he became father to Peleg.
17 And after his fathering Peleg, Eber continued to live 430 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.
18 And Peleg lived on for 30 years. Then he became father to Reu.
19 And after his fathering Reu, Peleg continued to live 209 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.
20 And Reu lived on for 32 years. Then he became father to Serug.
21 And after his fathering Serug, Reu continued to live 207 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters (Genesis 11).

So Reu and Peleg both stopped having kids aged 239 (BHS) (although they actually died aged 339 - LXXa). 

We have Eber living for 504 years then Peleg his son and Reu, Peleg’s son, both living for 239 procreative years, which we notice is just under 240 years, which we notice is twice 120 years. Then everybody after Reu lived less than 240 years. We take the 239 procreative year lifespan as being a hint that during these procreative years the full lifespan limit of man would be reduced to 240 years. 

25 And to Eber there were 2 sons born. The name of the one was Peleg, because in his days the earth was divided; and the name of his brother was Joktan (Genesis 10).

In the literal meaning of the verse above, the earth was divided as regards its language at the tower of Babel as described in Genesis 11:5-10.

But the name 'Peleg' means 'division'. The holy spirit is screaming out that we should also examine the meaning of Peleg's brother’s name, which is Joktan. For why tell us the meaning of the name of the one brother without telling us the meaning of the name of the other brother? 

Now Joktan N+qy is from the root N+q meaning: to be smaller or to be younger. So this division reflected by Peleg’s name was into younger men, reflected by Joktan’s name. Since to Eber there were two sons born, and they are symbolising a division of age, to make younger men, a division by 2, the most basic division. So we now deduce that the maximum age of the human body was reduced by a factor of 2 in the days of Peleg (after Reu, who lived 339 years and therefore was in the 480 year band)   was born. In any event Eber had two children both of whom stopped procreating aged 239 and who died aged 339. So he had two children of equal ages in respect of procreation and of death. This again indicates a division in two of maximum age of sons of Adam at that time. 

Putting this another way Eber had precisely 2 sons called 'division' and 'smaller'. So his sons had a maximum lifespan that was smaller by a division in 2 of the maximum lifespan of his generation (480 years which he Eber actually  exceeded by 24 years). This interpretation is cryptic, rather like a Times crossword. God is giving us clues in the scriptures, just as he does in our lives. 

Extrapolating this we deduce that there must have been 4 divisions by 2 to get us from 960 years down to 120 years. So we then have maximum ages of 120, 240, 480 and 960 with a few exceptions. The pre-flood maximum was 960 with the exceptions of Jared and Methuselah. The post Arpachshad's birth maximum was 480 with the exception of Eber, and the post Peleg's death maximum was 240 years with no exceptions. The post Moses' death maximum was 120 years with the exception of Jehoida who lived for 130 years...

15 And Jehoiada got to be old and satisfied with years and gradually died, being 130 years old at his death (2 Chronicles 24).

He died very gradually indeed! In fact the LWs actually deduced the 120 240 480 and 960 year max lifespan human bodies not from the above reasoning but from the sentence counting dimension of the bible code - see U235 on the research website for more on this.

Today we do have a limit of 120 years. It is clear that Adam had a lifespan limit since he lost his indefinite life. His life certainly became finite. The question is, how finite? The answer is 960 years for the pre flood system.

To put the reader out of his misery, the exceptions Jared, Methuselah, Eber and Jehoiada, all of whom breached the Adamic age limit for their generation, were not sons of Adam, they were non adamic like Jesus, who was born by holy spirit. The 120, 240, 480 and 960 year limits apply only to the sons of Adam.

[16]  An introduction to Satan, Michael, Gabriel

We shall discover that Satan was the first angel that God created. We shall discover that Michael was the angel that chose to be the most loyal to God and that loved men the most. We shall discover that Michael possessed Jesus during his entire ministry from his baptism until his sacrificial death. We shall discover that Satan lost his firstborn rights when he deceived Eve into losing her life and killing her husband. We shall discover that Michael gained these firstborn rights and more when he gave his life to ransom Adam, when he died sacrificially as an angel inside Jesus on the stake. We shall discover in later sections that Gabriel was loyal to both God and to Michael and played a huge role in the salvation of mankind and possessed John the baptist. These 3 are the key angelic players in the story of mankind. In this section we discover and prove that they were born in the following order:

1. Satan
2. Michael
3. Gabriel

We start by considering the common demise of the firstborn sons of all of the patriarchs.

Adam's firstborn son Cain lost his birthright to Seth, a son born much later.

Noah's firstborn son Ham, lost his birthright to Shem (proved later in the section).

Abraham's firstborn son Ishmael lost his birthright to the second born Isaac.

Isaac's firstborn son Esau lost his birthright (for a bowl of soup) to the second born Jacob

Jacob's firstborn son Reuben, lost his birthright (due to his taking his father's concubine) to the 11th born Joseph

Joseph's firstborn son Manasseh lost his birthright to the second  born Ephraim.

So to cut a long story short, every major patriarch in the bible had a firstborn son who lost his birthright to a more deserving later born son. So what does all of this mean in the greatest fulfillment??

Well, did God not say: Israel is my son, my firstborn (Exodus 4:22)?

But Israel was not originally the firstborn of Isaac (whose father was Abraham whose father was ... whose father was Adam whose father was God). Israel was Jacob who was the second born. But Israel became the firstborn of Isaac and of God due to his spirituality. Likewise did his prophet not say

9 For I have become to Israel a Father; and as for Ephraim, he is my firstborn (Jeremiah 31)?

But of course Ephraim was not the firstborn of Israel or the firstborn of Joseph. Manasseh was the firstborn of Joseph.

So the question is: Did this thing that happened with all of the patriarchs in the old testament happen also with the great Patriarch himself, Jehovah??

Was Michael the firstborn originally or did he earn this right as a result of his spirituality, and did he replace the angel that was truly born first? After all he prefigures Jacob, whose name means 'surplanter', in many symbolisms. Consider the following two groups of scriptures, one group set before Jesus died and the other after:

17 Look! Also, there was a voice from the heavens that said: This is my Son, the beloved, whom I have approved (Matthew 3).

5 While he was yet speaking, look! a bright cloud overshadowed them, and, look! a voice out of the cloud, saying: This is my Son, the beloved, whom I have approved; listen to him. (Matthew 17).

11 And a voice came out of the heavens: You are my Son, the beloved; I have approved you (Mark 1).

7 And a cloud formed, overshadowing them, and a voice came out of the cloud: This is my Son, the beloved; listen to him. (Mark 9).

22 And the holy spirit in bodily shape like a dove came down upon him, and a voice came out of heaven: You are my Son, the beloved; I have approved you (Luke 3).

Nowhere in the gospels or before did the true God say of Jesus or of Michael: You are my firstborn son, the beloved, I have approved you...

But after the resurrection we read:

15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation (Colossians 1).

18 And he is the head of the body, the congregation. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that he might become the one who is first in all things (Colossians 1).

6 But when he again brings his Firstborn into the inhabited earth, he says: And let all God's angels do obeisance to him (Hebrews 1).

But then we must realise one thing. Satan committed suicide inside Judas on the same day that Michael died in Jesus...

3 But Satan entered into Judas, the one called Iscariot, who was numbered among the twelve (Luke 22).

So presumably God resurrected Jesus before he resurrected Satan, thereby reversing their physical birth orders as well as transferring the firstborn rights.

Now why was it that Satan was the anointed Cherub covering Eden?

13 In Eden, the garden of God, you proved to be. Every precious stone was your covering, ruby, topaz and jasper; chrysolite, onyx and jade; sapphire, turquoise and emerald; and of gold was the workmanship of your settings and your sockets in you. In the day of your being created they were made ready.
14 You are the anointed cherub that is covering, and I have set you. On the holy mountain of God you proved to be. In the midst of fiery stones you walked about.
15 You were faultless in your ways from the day of your being created until unrighteousness was found in you (Ezekiel 28).

Well, Adam was God's own son, a son created by God alone, the most important addition to the family. Satan had the top job of looking after him because this job was the right of the firstborn through whom everything would have been done according to the Modus operandi of God, who gives his firstborn covenanted rights to be his CEO. 

Daniel reveals this great secret: 

13 But the prince of the royal realm of Persia was standing in opposition to me for 21 days, and, look! Michael, one of the foremost princes, came to help me; and I, for my part, remained there beside the kings of Persia (Daniel 10).

One of the foremost princes? yes, but the foremost prince? no. But Paul explicitly declares that he did eventually become the foremost prince, the archangel:

18 and he is the head of the body, the congregation. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that he might become the one who is first in all things (Colossians 1).

He became the firstborn angel of God at his resurrection from the dead. We must harmonise this with proverbs:

22 Jehovah himself produced me as the beginning of his way, the earliest of his achievements of long ago.
23 From time indefinite I was installed, from the start, from times earlier than the earth (Proverbs 8).

27 When he prepared the heavens, I was there (Proverbs 8).

The beginning of his way, and the earliest of his achievements relates to the creation of a loyal character not to creation itself it would appear, hence we read:

30 then I came to be beside him as a master worker, and I came to be the one he was specially fond of day by day, I being glad before him all the time (Proverbs 8).

Had Michael been the firstborn then he would not have "come to be" the one he was specially fond of, he would have always been that one.

9 For this very reason also God exalted him to a superior position and kindly gave him the name that is above every [other] name (Philippians 2).

There is no position superior to God's firstborn angel other than that of a God like Jehovah. So Jesus earned this position by his sacrifice.

14 And to the angel of the congregation in Laodicea write: These are the things that the Amen says, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation by God (Revelation 3).

This is the same statement as: Israel is my firstborn. This is: Jesus is the firstborn. He is, but not by birth. He is the beginning of creation by God, but not by originally being the beginning of creation by God, rather by becoming this beginning.

The birth order of Noah's 3 sons mimics the birth order of God's 3 sons Satan, Michael and Gabriel

32 And Noah got to be 500 years old. After that Noah became father to Shem, Ham and Japheth (Genesis 5).
6 And Noah was 600 years old when the deluge of waters occurred on the earth (Genesis 7).
10 Shem was 100 years old when he became father to Arpachshad 2 years after the deluge (Genesis 11).

From these 3 scriptures it is apparent that Shem was 100 years old when Noah was 602, at which time his firstborn son would have been 102 years old so Shem wasn't the firstborn. But Shem got the blessing of the firstborn:

26 Blessed be Jehovah, Shem's God, And let Canaan become a slave to him.
27 Let God grant ample space to Japheth, And let him reside in the tents of Shem.
Let Canaan become a slave to him also (Genesis 9).

So Shem was blessed as the firstborn, so either Ham or Japheth lost this right, but Japheth was also blessed and Ham's son Canaan was cursed, so Ham must have lost the firstborn right. This is why the order of their listing is: Shem Ham Japheth. The final firstborn, the original firstborn, and the third born. Since the pre flood humans took at least twice as long before they procreated it is reasonable to assume that their gestation period was twice as long as well. So Shem must have been the second born since he was born 2 years after Ham. So Japheth was the 3rd born. 

We have already seen in the cases of all the major patriarchs that the firstborn son represents Satan and a later born son who represents Michael gets the firstborn rights. In the case of Noah, there were 3 sons, one of whom behaved badly and the other two behaved well. So we equate the 3rd son with Gabriel. Then since the birth order of Noah's 3 sons was Ham, Shem, Japheth. We deduce that the birth order of the 3 angels was Satan, Michael, Gabriel.

Adam was an only child

Adam had no brothers or sisters, so it was impossible for him to lose his firstborn rights. In fact Satan took them from him and Jesus gave them back to him as we shall see in I28.

Note 1

The account in Genesis 9 of Noah's wine production experiment reveals that Ham saw Noah's nakedness, when Noah had had too much wine, and did not cover his father up. Instead he told Shem and Japheth about it, who did cover their father up walking in backwards and not seeing their father's nakedness. But Canaan, Ham's son, ended up being cursed as a result of this little drama. From this we must infer that Ham also told Canaan his son about Noah's nakedness and Canaan then abused this nakedness in some way. We therefore see that Ham incited one of his sons to abuse his father and the situation was rectified by Shem and Japheth. 

20 Now Noah started off as a farmer and proceeded to plant a vineyard.
21 And he began drinking of the wine and became intoxicated, and so he uncovered himself in the midst of his tent.
22 Later Ham, the father of Canaan saw his father's nakedness and went telling it to his two brothers outside.
23 At that Shem and Japheth took a mantle and put it upon both their shoulders and walked in backwards. Thus they covered their father's nakedness, while their faces were turned away, and they did not see their father's nakedness.
24 Finally Noah awoke from his wine and got to know what his youngest son [Canaan, a grandson was a son to early man] had done to him.
25 At this he said: Cursed be Canaan. Let him be the lowest slave to his brothers.
26 And he added: Blessed be Jehovah, Shem's God, And let Canaan become a slave to him.
27 Let God grant ample space to Japheth, And let him reside in the tents of Shem.
Let Canaan become a slave to him also (Genesis 9).

Noah (2), Nakedness (3), Mantle (1)

There is a similarity between the actions of Satan who abused God's love and incited demons to do the same and Michael and Gabriel who rectified the situation. Canaan is the body of the serpent, Satan's administration, Satan is the head, that gets crushed. The Tent is the Garden of Eden. The Mantle, the Garment, is the body that Adam was given, the ageing body, that gave him and us a second chance. Noah means Adam, and his sons in Word1 and in Word2. This body is thanks to the CRC and the ARC. The second word symbolic thread has Jesus being exposed as the abuse opportunity, and Canaan is the sons of Jerusalem incited by the pharisees incited by Satan to ask Pilate for the death of the Christ.

Mantle [outer covering] appears once only in Genesis 9 like Garments [twntk] meaning 'inner/total coverings' does in Genesis 3. But the Hebrew root for both words means 'to cover'. So the Hebrew words themselves could be any type of covering from a coat to a body in the literal meaning.

[17]  Michael was Enoch and Jesus

When Adam sinned God required a volunteer who was not judicially condemned to ransom him immediately. Without such a volunteer Adam would have had to have been killed and you would not be reading this page. That volunteer could not have been human since the pre adamics had no judicial life and Adam and Eve had both sinned so as to incur the death penalty. So the volunteer was an angel. This angel then had to die on the stake in order to ransom Adam. So it is easy to see that Jesus was possessed by an angel, the one who agreed to ransom him when Adam sinned. 

20 with which he has operated in the case of the Christ when he raised him up from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly places,
21 far above every government and authority and power and lordship and every name named, not only in this system of things, but also in that to come (Ephesians 1).

Such authority would have made the Christ into the archangel at the least. But Michael is the archangel...

9 But when Michael, the archangel, had a difference with the Devil and was disputing about Moses' body, he did not dare to bring a judgment against him in abusive terms, but said: May Jehovah rebuke you (Jude 9).

One can see that Jesus Christ was an angel from the words of Paul, who said...

14 And what was a trial to you in my flesh, you did not treat with contempt or spit at in disgust; but you received me as an angel of God, as Christ Jesus (Galatians 4).

So Jesus Christ is a particular angel of God.

God himself declares that Jesus was an angel saying...

3 He is the reflection of [his] glory and the exact representation of his very being, and he sustains all things by the word of his power; and after he had made a purification for our sins he sat down on the right hand of the Majesty in lofty places.
4 So he has become better than the angels, to the extent that he has inherited a name more excellent than theirs.
5 For example, to which one of the angels did he ever say: You are my son; I, today, I have become your father? And again: I myself shall become his father, and he himself will become my son? [he said this to the angel Michael].
6 But when he again brings his Firstborn [angel, the angel Michael] into the inhabited earth, he says: And let all God's angels do obeisance to/worship him (Hebrews 1).

Alternatively since Satan was looking after the humans in Eden and abused his position and since Jesus will be looking after us in the second Eden, the Kingdom of God, it is apparent that Jesus has gained the firstborn rights of Satan. Either way the angel who possessed Jesus is now an archangel. In this regard we read that the Son of man has authority over some of the angels...

41 The Son of man will send forth his angels, and they will collect out from his kingdom all things that cause stumbling and persons who are doing lawlessness (Matthew 13).

41 Then he will say, in turn, to those on his left: Be on your way from me, you who have been cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his angels (Matthew 25).

7 And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels battled with the dragon, and the dragon and its angels battled (Revelation 12).

So the good angels belong to the Son of man and to Michael. This is because Michael is the Son of man who is the Christ, the one and only head of the good angels. For God created no creature with two heads. As a result of this battle Satan was evicted from heaven and the Authority of Christ came to pass:

9 So down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called Devil and Satan, who is misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him.
10 And I heard a loud voice in heaven say: Now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been hurled down, who accuses them day and night before our God! (Revelations 12).

Jesus, the first born angel fights his own battles, he does not get authority as a result of the activities of another creation Michael, he is Michael.

21 However, I shall tell you the things noted down in the writing of truth, and there is no one holding strongly with me in these [things] but Michael, the prince of you people (Daniel 10).

6 For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us, and the princely rule will come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9).

1 And during that time Michael will stand up, the great prince who is standing in behalf of the sons of your people. And there will certainly occur a time of distress such as has not been made to occur since there came to be a nation until that time. And during that time your people will escape, every one who is found written down in the book (Daniel 12).

Well princes become Kings, and Jesus ends up as King over God’s people, so Michael the prince of God’s people is the one who came down into Jesus (for the mechanism of angelic or demonic possession - see I22), and then became their king.

9 But when Michael the archangel had a difference with the Devil and was disputing about Moses' body, he did not dare to bring a judgment against him in abusive terms, but said: May Jehovah rebuke you (Ju